“The effect of this decision is that for the first time in the United States, a court of law has ordered a
state agency to consider the most current and best available climate science when deciding to regulate
carbon dioxide emissions,” said Andrea Rodgers of the Western Environmental Law Center, attorney for
the youth petitioners. “The court directed Ecology to apply the agency’s own findings that climate
change presents an imminent threat to Washington and demands immediate action. The ball is now in
Ecology’s court to do the right thing and protect our children and future generations.”
BREAKING: Washington State Youth Win Unprecedented Decision in their Climate Change Lawsuit! #350ppm #climatejustice
Washington State Youth Win Unprecedented Decision in their
Climate Change Lawsuit
Judge Orders Washington Environmental Agency to Consider
Youth-Proposed Carbon Dioxide Reductions. Read the full press release and decision here: http://ourchildrenstrust.org/sites/default/files/15.06.24WADecisionPR.pdf
June 24, 2015
For inquiries or interview requests, please contact:
Andrea Rodgers 206-696-2851 rodgers@westernlaw.org
Julia Olson 415-786-4825 julia@ourchildrenstrust.org
Washington State Youth Win Unprecedented Decision in their
Climate Change Lawsuit
Judge Orders Washington Environmental Agency to Consider
Youth-Proposed Carbon Dioxide Reductions
Seattle, Washington – On Tuesday, King County Superior Court Judge Hollis Hill issued a landmark
decision in Zoe & Stella Foster v. Washington Department of Ecology, the climate change case brought
by eight young citizens of Washington State. In her decision, Judge Hill ordered the Washington
Department of Ecology (“Ecology”) to reconsider the petition the eight youth filed with Ecology last
year asking for carbon dioxide reductions, and to report back to the court by July 8, 2015, as to whether
they will consider the undisputed current science necessary for climate recovery.
Last June, the young petitioners filed a petition for rulemaking to Ecology requesting that the agency
promulgate a rule that would limit carbon dioxide emissions in Washington according to what scientists
say is needed to protect our oceans and climate system. The youth also asked Ecology to inform the
Legislature that existing statutory greenhouse gas reductions must be revised based on current climate
science. On August 14, 2014, Ecology denied the petition without disputing the underlying scientific
bases for petitioner’s plea. Arguing that they have a fundamental right to a healthy environment, and that
they are faced with increasing harms posed by climate destabilization and ocean acidification, the young
petitioners filed an appeal of the denial to vindicate this right on behalf of themselves and future
generations.
“The effect of this decision is that for the first time in the United States, a court of law has ordered a
state agency to consider the most current and best available climate science when deciding to regulate
carbon dioxide emissions,” said Andrea Rodgers of the Western Environmental Law Center, attorney for
the youth petitioners. “The court directed Ecology to apply the agency’s own findings that climate
change presents an imminent threat to Washington and demands immediate action. The ball is now in
Ecology’s court to do the right thing and protect our children and future generations.”
In a footnote to her order, Judge Hill explained her plain reasoning for rejecting Ecology’s plan to delay
action, referencing a December 2014 report from Ecology:
“Ecology suggests no change in greenhouse gas reduction standards until after an international
climate conference scheduled in Paris in December 2015, thus delaying action for at least a year
from the date of the report or one year and five months after the report’s original due date.
Neither in its briefing nor in oral argument of this appeal did the Department seek to justify this
suggested delay. The report itself states that after the Paris conference Washington would be
better informed how the state’s limits should be adjusted.”
“Kids understand the threats climate change will have on our future,” said 13-year-old petitioner Zoe
Foster. “I’m not going to sit by and watch my government do nothing. We don’t have time to waste. I’m
pushing my government to take real action on climate, and I won’t stop until change is made.”
The court’s opinion acknowledges that climate change is currently happening and will have devastating
impacts on the natural environment of Washington. Citing Ecology’s December report, the court wrote:
“Washington State’s existing statutory limits should be adjusted to better reflect the current
science. The limits need to be more aggressive in order for Washington to do its part to address
climate risks.”
Ecology has recognized that “we are imposing risks on future generations (causing intergenerational
inequities) and liability for the harm that will be caused by climate change that we are unable or
unwilling to avoid.”
Current climate science finds that atmospheric carbon dioxide levels must be reduced from the current
global annual mean concentration of 401 parts per million, to 350 ppm by 2100 in order to achieve 1
climate stabilization and protect our oceans from catastrophic acidification.
“This encouraging court decision reminds us that there is still good basis for optimism about legal
strategies that aim to require governments to draft an action plan consistent with a more stringent
mitigation target than the ones that are commonly discussed,” said the youth’s expert, NASA climate
scientist Dr. Pushker Kharecha. “I hope the Department of Ecology realizes that such a plan would be 2
more achievable than they think in this case, and that they will therefore choose to amend their decision
accordingly.”
“This is a decision of immense national significance,” said Julia Olson, executive director of Our
Children’s Trust, the nonprofit spearheading similar cases around the country. “Judge Hill acknowledges
the urgent and dire acceleration of global warming, refuses to accept any more bureaucratic delay, and
mandates that the State consider and act in just two weeks time on the youth’s scientific evidence that
atmospheric levels of carbon dioxide must be reduced to 350 ppm. This judge understands the role of the
NOAA, Global Greenhouse Reference Network, Global CO2 for April 2015 (http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/ 1
global.html).
Dr. Pushker Kharecha is a climate scientist at the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies (http://www.giss.nasa.gov/ 2
staff/pkharecha.html) and Columbia University Earth Institute (http://www.earth.columbia.edu/eidirectory/displayuser.php?
userid=1860).
judiciary to enforce citizen’s rights to fair evaluation of their grounded petitions and the critical urgency
that government act substantively and without delay to protect the state’s resources and the children who
depend on them.”
“The court's decision brings a feeling of triumph,” said 14-year-old petitioner Aji Piper. “But I
know there is still a lot of work to be done. We may have one a battle, but we're still fighting a
bigger war.”
The youth petitioners acted with the help of Our Children’s Trust, an Oregon-based nonprofit
orchestrating a global, game-changing, youth-driven legal campaign to establish the right to a healthy
atmosphere and stable climate. The legal effort advances the fundamental duty of government today: to
address the climate crisis based on scientific baselines and benchmarks, and to do so within timeframes
determined by scientific analysis.
Our Children's Trust is a nonprofit organization advocating for urgent emissions reductions on behalf of youth
and future generations, who have the most to lose if emissions are not reduced. OCT is spearheading the
international human rights and environmental TRUST Campaign to compel governments to safeguard the
atmosphere as a "public trust" resource. We use law, film, and media to elevate their compelling voices. Our
ultimate goal is for governments to adopt and implement enforceable science-based Climate Recovery Plans with
annual emissions reductions to return to an atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration of 350 ppm.
www.ourchildrenstrust.org/
The Western Environmental Law Center is a public interest nonprofit law firm. WELC combines legal skills with
sound conservation biology and environmental science to address major environmental issues throughout the
West. WELC does not charge clients and partners for services, but relies instead on charitable gifts from
individuals, families, and foundations to accomplish its mission. http://www.westernlaw.org
###
NOAA, Global Greenhouse Reference Network, Global CO2 for April 2015 (http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/ 1
global.html).
Dr. Pushker Kharecha is a climate scientist at the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies (http://www.giss.nasa.gov/ 2
staff/pkharecha.html) and Columbia University Earth Institute (http://www.earth.columbia.edu/eidirectory/displayuser.php?
userid=1860).
|
Thank You for stopping by-Share and Comment below.
If additional information in needed or you have a question let me know.
Together we can make a difference and create a future that will benefit everyone.
Build a Green StLouis
Green Building Tips and Resources via:
Scotty-
St Louis Renewable Energy Green Blog
-->