-- Scotts Contracting - StLouis Renewable Energy

Search This Blog

6.18.2010

The Solar Roadrunner

Feature
Highways basking in the hot sun are wasted energy. Scott Brusaw's solution? Make them out of solar panels

Scott Brusaw's Solar Roadways Kevin Hand

The road ahead is paved with photovoltaics. That's how Scott Brusaw sees it, anyway. His company, Solar Roadways, is embedding PV cells and LED lights into panels engineered to withstand the forces of traffic. The lights would allow for "smart" roadways and parking lots with changeable signage, while the cells would generate enough energy to power businesses, cities and, eventually, the entire country.

Each 12-by-12-foot Solar Roadway panel would produce about 7,600 watt-hours a day, based on an average of four hours of sunlight. At that rate, a one-mile stretch of four-lane highway could power about 500 homes. "If we could ever replace all the roads in the U.S., then, yeah, we would produce more electricity than we use as a nation," says Brusaw, an electrical engineer who completed his first prototype panel in February with funding from the U.S. Department of Transportation.

Brusaw's goal is to get the cost per panel under $10,000. That's roughly three times the cost of asphalt. But he wants to make panels that last three times longer than asphalt roads, which have to be resurfaced every 10 years in many places. "Then the cost is about the same," he says. "But that's just a break-even. We're also generating electricity."

The key to commercial viability will be the panels' glass. It must be textured for traction, embedded with heating elements for melting away ice and snow, and able to survive years of traffic. "The toughest is going to be that fast lane on the highway," Brusaw says, "where you've got a 40-ton truck, maybe with snow chains. It will have to be able to withstand all that." At the same time, it has to be self-cleaning if sunlight is to reach the PV cells; Brusaw points to experimental hydrophilic glass that uses sunlight to break down organic dirt, and rainwater to wash it away without streaking.

Next up for Solar Roadways will be qualifying for Phase II funding, a two-year, $750,000 deal to develop a commercial plan for the panels. At the end of those two years, Brusaw would like to be ready for testing in parking lots, which he sees as the perfect proving grounds for the lights and the power-generation system. Directional arrows and parking lines could be reconfigured to deal with busy times, and the electricity generated could feed adjacent businesses. "I talked to the guy in charge of power for Wal-Mart," Brusaw says. "Superstores are roughly 200,000 square feet, and parking lots are about four times that. I crunched the numbers for an 800,000-square-foot lot and told him how much power it could generate even if it was completely full of cars. It was 10 times the power they use."

Brusaw wants to start smaller, though—on the scale of, say, a fast-food restaurant. A McDonald's retrofitted with a solar parking lot could take itself largely or entirely off the grid or become a site for recharging electric vehicles (while the owners stopped inside for food, naturally). "Even the best electric cars have a range of about three hours," he explains. "But if all I have to do is find a McDonald's, I could drive from Idaho to the southern tip of Florida." Improbable? Yes. But "Billions of watts served" would be a cool new tagline.

The Lazy Environmentalist: No-Sweat Tips For Going Green

Get Paid to Save Money on Your Utility Bill
The My Emissions Exchange Web site challenges homeowners to conserve energy and calculates the equivalent amount of carbon emissions avoided. Reduce your electric bill by about $200, for instance, and you'll generate a carbon credit, which is equal to roughly one ton of carbon saved. My Emissions Exchange sells the credit on your behalf on the voluntary carbon market at a going rate of between $10 and $25, taking a 20 percent cut on all sales. The rest goes into your PayPal account.

Josh Dorfman is the author of The Lazy Environmentalist: Your Guide to Easy, Stly===ylish Green Living



--
Scott's Contracting
scottscontracting@gmail.com
http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.blogspot.com
http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.com
scotty@stlouisrenewableenergy.com

Best And Worst Home Improvements For The Buck

Boosting a home's value is easier--and cheaper--than you might think

By Stephane Fitch, Forbes.comJun 17th, 2010

If you plan to sell your home in the next year, you're probably keen on finding a few ways to gin up its value. For many people that means donning an old pair of overalls, pulling out the power tools and going to work on some ambitious renovation projects.

Here's a smarter idea: Leave the work duds in the closet, the tools in the garage and the renovation plans on hold. Instead, get out a large trash can and a dust rag.

20 Best And Worst Home Improvements For The BuckWhere America's Money Is Moving

"Just clean up your act," says Chicago real estate agent Zack Sudler. "Put your junk in a storage locker, neaten, fix the wobbly ceiling fan--and do it before you call your Realtor."

An important point that many home sellers fail to realize: Their first sales job involves hiring a top-notch agent. Many of the best professional home sellers will shy away from putting a lot of time into selling your home if it's a mess.

The only home improvement Sudler recommends is painting. Even there, he advises limiting the work to covering blemishes and repainting any rooms that have overly bright or outdated colors.

On the bigger pre-sale improvement projects, real estate pros tend to have a fairly uniform view: They're rarely worth the money and effort. For most, the value added is a mere fraction of the cost.

To be sure, home renovations can have enormous benefits--to residents rather than sellers. Air conditioning or a new kitchen might dramatically improve your lifestyle. But the incremental amount a buyer will pay for a home after such projects are completed is likely to be well below the seller's cost.

"We've seen homes where sellers have contractors still toiling away when the open houses start," says Patrick Lashinsky, chief executive of San Francisco-based realty agency ZipRealty. "It's a nightmare."

The National Association of Realtors conducts an annual survey of its members in 80 cities that is created by Remodeling magazine and used to estimate the return on investment for 33 home improvement projects. The 2009 report concluded that, on average, for every $1,000 homeowners spend on projects, they get back $638.

Even projects normally hyped as sure bets for adding value generate surprisingly weak gains, NAR reports. Converting an attic into a bedroom, for example, is typically regarded as garnering interest among potential buyers who might have otherwise disqualified the home from their search. An extra bedroom will indeed add value--just not for the majority of people who spend on the conversion. NAR figures homeowners recoup $831 on average for every $1,000 they invest.

Kitchens and bathrooms remain two of the most popular upgrades, and do have among the best returns on remodeling investments. But even for these rooms, mid-range jobs, which offer the highest returns, yield only about $720 and $710, respectively, on average, for each $1,000 invested.

The only investment that tends to get more out of buyers than sellers put into it is a heavy, insulated steel entry door, according to the NAR/Remodeling survey. Spend $1,000 on such an upgrade and you're likely to add $1,289 to your sale price.

If you're looking for examples of ways to waste money on renovations, there are lots of choices. Remodeling a home office yields just $481 for every $1,000 invested. Buying a backup power generator (perhaps from the likes of Honda or Briggs & Stratton) will add only $589 for each $1,000 invested.

All this is anathema to retailers like Home Depot, Lowe's, Bed, Bath & Beyond, Williams-Sonoma and Lumber Liquidators. They all benefit from the myth that pumping money into your house pays off later on the auction block. So do buildings materials firms like Chicago-based USG, maker of the popular Sheetrock brand of gypsum wallboard.

Lashinsky says that on occasion, buying a new appliance for your home can pay off--if the one being replaced is so horribly out of date that it unsettles potential bidders. The agent has a long list of bad ideas to avoid. Among them: Converting a bedroom into a home office and yanking out the closet to make the room look bigger.

"In quite a few states, you're not allowed to list that as a bedroom anymore," he says. Such renovations can be expensive and result in the loss of bidders who need the extra bedroom.

Lashinsky's choice for all-time worst renovation: A family that tore out a long wooden stairway leading up to their lovely hillside home and replaced it with a newly paved path. They made the change right before putting the home on the block in mid-winter, and the path kept icing over.

"People who wanted to see the house literally couldn't get up the path," says Lashinsky. "They kept sliding back down every time they got near the place."

10 Best And Worst Home Improvements For The Buck

Best Improvement: Clean Up
Cost: Negligible
Give your home a top-to-bottom cleaning or, better yet, hire a pro to do a deep clean. Do it even before you hiring a real estate agent. If you don't have a regular cleaner, hire one to keep the place tidy until your house is sold.

Good Improvement: Simple Repairs
Cost: Negligible
It is well worth the modest cost to fix broken outlets, tiles, light switches, door latches, folding doors and ceiling fans. Buyers view such flaws as signs of deeper problems--and may lower their bids accordingly.

Good Improvement: Store Your Clutter
Cost: $100 a month
A 10-foot-by-10-foot locker at Public Storage or one of its competitors is likely to cost you less than your phone and cable bills. Move out unneeded dishes, linens, personal items and furniture. Try to empty closets. Your house will appear bigger and more valuable.

Good Improvement: Paint Exterior and Interior
Cost: $100 to $1,000
If the paint on the front of your house is peeling, scrape it and repaint. Indoors, cover up any blemishes and repaint any rooms in loud colors that may be off-putting to others.

Good Improvement: Tidy the Yard
Cost: $100 to $300
No need to break the bank here. Mow the lawn, weed the flowerbeds and pull any dying bushes. Plant flowers in bare spots.

Good Improvement: Replace Hardware
Cost: $300
It's a mistake to replace the kitchen cabinets or closet doors. But you can convince buyers to pay a little more by installing new handles, knobs and drawer pulls where needed.

Good Improvement: Replace Ugly Appliance
Cost: $500 to $1000
A new stainless steel range will not prompt buyers to pay much more for your home. But a seriously bedraggled stove or refrigerator could scare them off. If you've got a junky-looking appliance, swap it out for a budget-minded replacement.

Good Improvement: Steel Entry Door
Cost: Around $1,170
A heavy entry door comes with an impressive return: You're likely to get back your investment plus a 29% gain, according to the National Association of Realtors remodeling 2009 report.

Good Improvement: Roofing Credit
Cost: $19,700
If your roof leaks, offer the buyer a discount. It's likely to cost you less than the difference between what it'll cost you to replace the roof before selling and the lesser amount you'll recoup afterward. Source: National Association of Realtors/Remodeling.

Bad Improvement: Family Room Addition
Cost: $82,800
If you're itching to add a family room, do it for your family. Do not do it to profit from selling your home; you're likely to be disappointed. Source: National Association of Realtors/Remodeling.

Click here to see the full list of the Best And Worst Home Improvements For The Buck


--
Scott's Contracting
scottscontracting@gmail.com
http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.blogspot.com
http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.com
scotty@stlouisrenewableenergy.com

Gulf oil full of methane, adding new concerns

Jake Tapper on Barton's Apology to BP Play Video ABC News  – Jake Tapper on Barton's Apology to BP
Related Quotes
Symbol Price Change
BP 32.04 +0.33
^GSPC 1,116.78 +0.74
^IXIC 2,306.91 -0.25
The oil damaged shoreline in the Northern reaches of Barataria Bay is seen amidst work boats in oil polluted waters as Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal's t AP – The oil damaged shoreline in the Northern reaches of Barataria Bay is seen amidst work boats in oil polluted …

NEW ORLEANS – It is an overlooked danger in the oil spill crisis: The crude gushing from the well contains vast amounts of natural gas that could pose a serious threat to the Gulf of Mexico's fragile ecosystem.

The oil emanating from the seafloor contains about 40 percent methane, compared with about 5 percent found in typical oil deposits, said John Kessler, a Texas A&M University oceanographer who is studying the impact of methane from the spill.

That means huge quantities of methane have entered the Gulf, scientists say, potentially suffocating marine life and creating "dead zones" where oxygen is so depleted that nothing lives.

"This is the most vigorous methane eruption in modern human history," Kessler said.

Methane is a colorless, odorless and flammable substance that is a major component in the natural gas used to heat people's homes. Petroleum engineers typically burn off excess gas attached to crude before the oil is shipped off to the refinery. That's exactly what BP has done as it has captured more than 7.5 million gallons of crude from the breached well.

A BP spokesman said the company was burning about 30 million cubic feet of natural gas daily from the source of the leak, adding up to about 450 million cubic feet since the containment effort started 15 days ago. That's enough gas to heat about 450,000 homes for four days.

But that figure does not account for gas that eluded containment efforts and wound up in the water, leaving behind huge amounts of methane. Scientists are still trying to measure how much has escaped into the water and how it may damage the Gulf and it creatures.

The dangerous gas has played an important role throughout the disaster and response. A bubble of methane is believed to have burst up from the seafloor and ignited the rig explosion. Methane crystals also clogged a four-story containment box that engineers earlier tried to place on top of the breached well.

Now it is being looked at as an environmental concern.

The small microbes that live in the sea have been feeding on the oil and natural gas in the water and are consuming larger quantities of oxygen, which they need to digest food. As they draw more oxygen from the water, it creates two problems. When oxygen levels drop low enough, the breakdown of oil grinds to a halt; and as it is depleted in the water, most life can't be sustained.


The National Science Foundation funded research on methane in the Gulf amid concerns about the depths of the oil plume and questions what role natural gas was playing in keeping the oil below the surface, said David Garrison, a program director in the federal agency who specializes in biological oceanography.

"This has the potential to harm the ecosystem in ways that we don't know," Garrison said. "It's a complex problem."

BP CEO Tony Hayward on Thursday told Congress members that he was "so devastated with this accident," "deeply sorry" and "so distraught."

But he also testified that he was out of the loop on decisions at the well and disclaimed knowledge of any of the myriad problems on and under the Deepwater Horizon rig before the deadly explosion. BP was leasing the rig the Deepwater Horizon that exploded April 20, killing 11 workers and triggering the environmental disaster.

"BP blew it," said Rep. Bart Stupak, D-Mich., chairman of the House investigations panel that held the hearing. "You cut corners to save money and time."

In early June, a research team led by Samantha Joye of the Institute of Undersea Research and Technology at the University of Georgia investigated a 15-mile-long plume drifting southwest from the leak site. They said they found methane concentrations up to 10,000 times higher than normal, and oxygen levels depleted by 40 percent or more.

The scientists found that some parts of the plume had oxygen concentrations just shy of the level that tips ocean waters into the category of "dead zone" — a region uninhabitable to fish, crabs, shrimp and other marine creatures.

Kessler has encountered similar findings. Since he began his on-site research on Saturday, he said he has already found oxygen depletions of between 2 percent and 30 percent in waters 1,000 feet deep.

Shallow waters are normally more susceptible to oxygen depletion. Because it is being found in such deep waters, both Kessler and Joye do not know what is causing the depletion and what the impact could be in the long- or short-term.

In an e-mail, Joye called her findings "the most bizarre looking oxygen profiles I have ever seen anywhere."

Representatives of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration acknowledged that so much methane in the water could draw down oxygen levels and slow the breakdown of oil in the Gulf, but cautioned that research was still under way to understand the ramifications.

"We haven't seen any long-term changes or trends at this point," said Robert Haddad, chief of the agency's assessment and restoration division.

Haddad said early efforts to monitor the spill had focused largely on the more toxic components of oil. However, as new data comes in, he said NOAA and other federal agencies will get a more accurate read on methane concentrations and the effects.

"The question is what's going on in the deeper, colder parts of the ocean," he said. "Are the (methane) concentrations going to overcome the amount of available oxygen? We want to make sure we're not overloading the system."

BP spokesman Mark Proegler disputed Joye's suggestion that the Gulf's deep waters contain large amounts of methane, noting that water samples taken by BP and federal agencies have shown minimal underwater oil outside the spill's vicinity.

"The gas that escapes, what we don't flare, goes up to the surface and is gone," he said.

Steven DiMarco, an oceanographer at Texas A&M University who has studied a long-known "dead zone" in the Gulf, said one example of marine life that could be affected by low oxygen levels in deeper waters would be giant squid — the food of choice for the endangered sperm whale population. Squid live primarily in deep water, and would be disrupted by lower oxygen levels, DiMarco said.

Meanwhile, the Coast Guard signaled a shift in strategy Friday to fight the oil, saying it was ramping up efforts to capture the crude closer to shore.

Coast Guard Adm. Thad Allen said an estimated 2,000 private boats in the so-called "vessels of opportunity" program will be more closely linked through a tighter command and control structure to direct them to locations less than 50 miles offshore to skim the oil. Allen, the point man for the federal response to the spill, previously had said surface containment efforts would be concentrated much farther offshore.



--
Scott's Contracting
314-243-1953
scottscontracting@gmail.com
http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.blogspot.com
http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.com
scotty@stlouisrenewableenergy.com

Industry reactions on Kerry Lieberman American Power Act

Industry groups, utilities and advocacy organizations are already sounding off following the release of the draft legislation put forward by Sens. John Kerry and Joe Lieberman.

Summaries of the act spell out a goal of reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 17 percent by 2020 and 80 percent by 2050. To achieve these cuts, the act will reportedly use a carbon cap-and-trade program.

Here is a sampling of what energy sector groups have to say about the American Power Act:

AWEA statement:

The American Wind Energy Association (AWEA) issued the following statement from AWEA CEO Denise Bode on the bill outlined by Senators Kerry and Lieberman:

"The wind energy industry appreciates the efforts of Senators Kerry and Lieberman to address climate change in their proposal. We look forward to seeing provisions on renewable energy like a strong renewable electricity standard as well as energy efficiency to create new clean energy jobs and avoid carbon in the near term in any package considered by the Senate. We urge Senate leadership to move quickly on strong legislation."
 
Duke Energy statement:

The following is a statement from Duke Energy Chairman, President and CEO Jim Rogers about energy and environmental legislation proposed today by Senators John Kerry and Joe Lieberman.

"Senators Kerry and Lieberman's energy bill will create jobs, protect electricity consumers, make our nation's energy supply more secure, and protect our environment. Their leadership — and the efforts of Senator Lindsey Graham to craft this legislation — is extraordinary. 

"The legislation can help the U.S. get its economic 'mojo' back. It also sends a clear signal to our nation's innovators that there will be markets for their products and services. 

"One of my first jobs after law school was as a consumer advocate in Kentucky, challenging utility rate cases in the 1970s.

"Today, I am here as an advocate for Duke Energy's 4 million customers in five states in the Midwest and Carolinas who depend on coal for the majority of their electricity. I am also here as an advocate for the tens of millions of electricity customers in the 25 states where more than 50 percent of their electricity is generated using coal.

"Senators Kerry and Lieberman's bill helps 'get our transition right' to clean modern energy in a manner that protects American families and protects American factories, both of which depend on affordable power.

"It also gives our electric industry the policy roadmap we need to invest tens of billions of private capital to retire and replace aging power plant fleets with modern, efficient and clean plants.

"The sooner senators from both parties weigh in to constructively debate and move this legislation forward, the faster the private sector can put people to work and help get our economy moving again."

Dow Chemical Co. statement:

The Dow Chemical Co. commends Senators Kerry and Lieberman for their hard work in developing draft legislation (The American Power Act) for a comprehensive energy and climate change plan. We also commend Senator Graham for his bipartisan contribution to this legislation.

Dow supports a sustainable energy policy for the United States. We urge Congress to pass legislation this year in order to create American jobs, enhance national energy security and lower greenhouse gas emissions.

The certainty of a comprehensive, sustainable energy plan will allow manufacturing companies like Dow to make investments in clean energy that will power the American economy, foster innovation, optimize our domestic energy resources and allow the U.S. to capture the lead in the global clean energy market.

This bill recognizes the need to maintain and enhance the competitiveness of American manufacturers. We look forward to working with Senators Kerry, Lieberman, Sherrod Brown and others to ensure that the provisions in the bill are workable and effective in preventing the shifting of carbon emissions to other parts of the world.

Today the Senate begins a process of additional deliberation to produce final legislation. Dow will continue to support this process with the aim of passing a bill that garners bipartisan support that creates new jobs, improves our energy security, drives innovation and protects our environment.

FPL Group CEO, Lew Hay statement:

"Senators Kerry and Lieberman deserve tremendous credit for crafting a proposal that would move the country in the right direction on energy and climate issues. After years of debate and half measures, the United States still lacks a long-term national energy strategy, leaving us behind other countries in building and exporting the clean energy economy of the future. If we are to continue to lead the world in technological advances, job creation and economic security, we need a new approach. The most essential step — which is at the heart of the American Power Act — is to set a price on carbon dioxide emissions. With a gradually escalating price on carbon that begins to reflect the full social costs of emitting greenhouse gases, the country will make a smooth transition from the high-carbon fuel sources of the past to the next generation of low- and zero-emitting domestic energy sources. No legislation is ever perfect, this bill included, but Sens. Kerry and Lieberman have shown true leadership in their efforts to reach a balanced solution that all parties to this debate should be able to support. We applaud their efforts and look forward to working with them to get a bill signed into law."

T. Boone Pickens statement:

"Senators Kerry and Lieberman are to be commended for a plan that recognizes the economic and national security threat of our ever-increasing dependence on foreign oil, particularly OPEC oil. Achieving energy security is not easy and I applaud their focus on a broad energy package that includes replacing foreign oil/diesel/gasoline with cleaner, abundant domestic natural gas in America's heavy duty vehicle fleets. I look forward to working with them in the coming weeks to focus attention on that aspect of their legislation. More than 1.6 million Americans have signed on to my campaign to solve the foreign oil crisis, and I'm going to see to it that this objective is achieved as the legislative process evolves. Using natural gas as a transportation fuel is a non-partisan issue. The time to act is now."

Natural Resources Defense Council statement:

Today, Senator Kerry and Senator Lieberman released comprehensive clean energy and climate legislation. The bill provides a good starting point, and we look forward to working with Senator Majority Leader Reid and President Obama to build on this foundation without delay to deliver legislation that puts Americans back to work, reduces our dependence on oil, and creates a healthier future for our children.

We need that legislation now more than ever. As the Deepwater Horizon disaster continues to unfold with tragic consequences, it has become painfully clear that America needs a safer, cleaner approach to energy development. Congress must enact a comprehensive clean energy and climate bill this year that puts America back in control of our energy situation.

This draft legislation gets us moving in the right direction.

It is too soon to say where NRDC stands on every aspect of the bill. As I write this, NRDC experts are combing through the document, and I imagine they will discover things in it that NRDC likes and things we don't. Here's where we stand on what we've seen so far.

* The bill's core carbon pollution limits are solid. These emission limits get tighter every year and will drive investments in clean energy that create jobs, cut pollution, and end our addiction to oil from dangerous locations, both offshore and overseas. 

* The bill would be more effective if its overall pollution limits were backed up by minimum performance standards for the largest polluters. We will work to strengthen the bill to preserve more of the Clean Air Act's proven approach to cutting air pollution.

* The bill must not create incentives for offshore oil drilling or push forward drilling before we understand the risks involved for specific areas. The current presidential moratorium does not go far enough, and does not, for example, stop the drilling planned for this summer in Alaska.

* The subsidies for nuclear power in the draft bill are excessive and the proposed weakening of safety and environmental licensing reviews is ill-advised. NRDC will oppose these provisions.

* The energy efficiency and forest protection provisions should be more robust, and NRDC will work to strengthen these provisions as the process moves forward.

Senators Kerry and Lieberman have done a remarkable job of building the foundation for clean energy and climate action and overall, I believe the bill is a good start. But to realize the promise of the bill, we need leadership from the top.

We need President Obama and Majority Leader Reid to guide a process that brings Senators of good will from both sides of the aisle together around a comprehensive clean energy and climate bill — one that draws on the best elements of this bill as well as other proposals so the Senate can pass effective legislation without delay.

United Steelworkers statement:

Leo W. Gerard, International President of the United Steelworkers, issued the following statement:

"The USW has long believed that the goals of stopping the threat of climate change and creating thousands of clean energy jobs can and should be two sides of the same coin. To do this, a climate bill must ensure that emissions are actually reduced and not simply off-shored along with millions of American jobs.

"A well-constructed approach should limit the amount of carbon 'leakage' — the incentive for production of goods and jobs to simply move to countries that fail to address global climate change. This leakage of emissions and jobs has the potential to undermine both the economic and environmental goals of energy and climate legislation, and it is critical that any climate bill include a comprehensive and fully-funded package of policies to prevent it.

"Energy-intensive, trade-exposed manufactured products will be more heavily impacted by a carbon price than others — and while this can be mitigated long-term by improvements in efficiency and cleaner processes — this will take time and requires the right combination of adopted policies. In the meantime, these industries could potentially face decimation and massive job loss at the hands of foreign competitors that do not face similar carbon costs, unless both a short-term and long-term program is put in place to ensure the cost disadvantage faced by US manufacturers is eliminated.

"At the beginning of the U.S. program, a robust and fully-funded transition assistance program of output-based allocations for at-risk manufacturers is necessary. These allocations will allow manufacturers the breathing room necessary to make investments in cleaner processes, but they should be considered temporary in nature. They must be backed up by a border allowance requirement on products from countries that do not share America's commitment to reducing greenhouse gas emissions through effective, meaningful and comparable policies.

"Climate change legislation, done properly, has the potential to create new and expanding opportunities for revitalizing manufacturing and job creation in this country. This requires not only a comprehensive anti-leakage program, but a variety of other policies such as an ambitious Renewable Electricity Standard, an effective worker training provision, and incentives for clean energy product manufacturing. It must recognize that for the American economy to truly thrive, this bill must focus on the entire clean energy supply chain.

Shell Oil Co. statement:

"Shell commends Senators Kerry and Lieberman for introducing an energy and climate bill designed to strengthen our economy, create jobs and enhance our energy security while reducing greenhouse gas emissions."

"This legislation ensures America's global competitiveness and recognizes the role clean natural gas can play in growing the economy and protecting the environment. The senators have taken a fresh approach to transportation emissions that encourages the development of home-grown energy, provides transparency for consumers and enables American refiners to compete against imports of diesel and gasoline."

"We are pleased the senators engaged Shell, along with other energy companies and an array of environmental and business groups, in dialogue as the bill was developed. They have pursued an open and inclusive process and ensured that a range of views were taken into account. Shell recognizes the hard work and important contributions of Senator Lindsay Graham to this process."

"The demand for energy continues to grow. All energy sources — oil, gas, wind, solar, nuclear, and energies yet to be discovered — will be part of our energy mix for decades to come. Shell continues to employ our people, technology and expertise in the environmentally sound development of existing and future energies. We remain committed to America's energy security and global competitiveness."

Westinghouse Electric Co. statement:

In commenting on the legislation, Westinghouse President and CEO Dr. Aris S. Candris said:

"The new nuclear energy plants that are being built, and will be built, over the next decades are clearly the most efficient and safest electricity-generating plants ever designed. The Westinghouse AP1000 nuclear plant, for example, makes use of naturally occurring, passive safety systems that rely on gravity, condensation and natural circulation to begin cooling the plant in the highly unlikely event of an accident even without human intervention.

"This unsurpassed level of safety of the new plants, and the proven track record of success of the existing operating fleet, will help to ensure that nuclear energy achieves its full potential and that the United States will be able to achieve higher levels of energy independence."

NRG Energy statement:

"This bill marks another major step forward on America's path to energy security, internationally competitive industries, new American jobs and a clean, healthy environment. Our country today faces new and sobering energy policy and national security threats, which need to be addressed through safe, clean domestic energy and ways to use it instead of imported oil," said David Crane, NRG Energy President and Chief Executive Officer. "As a leading developer of new nuclear power plants and an innovative electric car charging business, NRG especially appreciates this bill's strong and pragmatic provisions to ramp up the nuclear renaissance, while quickly deploying the infrastructure for electric vehicles. These steps, along with aggressive, budget-neutral funding for renewable energy and carbon capture and storage, are the most effective means to quickly give American drivers a safe, homegrown, competitive alternative to importing oil from unfriendly regimes—while squarely addressing our major sources of carbon dioxide emissions."



--
Scott's Contracting
314-243-1953
scottscontracting@gmail.com
http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.blogspot.com
http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.com
scotty@stlouisrenewableenergy.com

Connect with Scotts Contracting

FB FB Twitter LinkedIn Blog Blog Blog Blog Pinterest

Featured Post

How Two Friends Turned Abandoned CASTLE into a 4☆HOTEL | by @chateaudut...

Join us on an extraordinary journey as two lifelong friends, Francis and Benoit, turn a crumbling, centuries-old castle into a stunning 4-st...