-- Scotts Contracting - StLouis Renewable Energy

Search This Blog

7.13.2010

Ten Clean Energy Stocks for 2010: Q2 Update




The dismal performance of renewable energy stocks so far this year is likely to lead to great buying opportunities in the rest of the year.
Published: July 12, 2010

In the six months since I published my annual clean energy mini-portfolio, it has far outperformed my industry benchmark, the Powershares Wilderhill Clean Energy Index (PBW). 2010 is the third year in a row that I've published a list of ten renewable and energy efficiency stocks that I expect to perform well over the coming year. The details on the list for 2010 are provided at the bottom of this article. This article is my second quarterly look back at the performance of the ten stocks so far this year. (See links to the PBW index and my first article on my 2010 list of clean energy stocks at the bottom of this page.)

These stocks are intended for small investors wanting to put some money in the sector, but not satisfied with the performance or holdings of clean energy mutual funds or clean energy exchange traded funds (ETFs). Please consult your investment advisor to decide if any or all of them are appropriate for your portfolio.

The diagram below shows the two versions of the my Ten Clean Energy Stocks for 2010 mini-portfolio, with the outer ring denoting an equal weight portfolio of ten stocks, including three energy efficiency stocks, three electric grid stocks, three alternative transportation stocks, and one biomass/waste to energy stock. The inner ring denotes a simplified portfolio, which substitutes the Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) for the three electric grid stocks and the Powershares Global Progressive Transport ETF (PTRP) for the three alternative transportation stocks. For future reference, I'll call the portfolio shown in the outer ring "10 stocks for 2010" and the portfolio shown in the inner ring "4 stocks plus 2 ETFs for 2010."

Performance

Since December 27th, the Russell 3000 broad market benchmark has fallen 3.67%, while the Powershares Wilderhill Clean Energy Index (PBW) has fallen 21.7%. Both portfolios are trailing the broad market by less than 2%, while outperforming the industry benchmark by almost 16%, producing a nearly identical -5.21% for the ten stocks for 2010 and -5.34% for the four stocks plus two ETFs for 2010.

Performance Chart

Coming Opportunities

While the performance against PBW is impressive, most investors would have probably been happier if they had simply stayed out of the market, or hedged their market exposure so far this year, which is exactly what I've been urging readers to do (see here, here, and here.) Although I saw some brief buying opportunities in clean energy at the end of May (I picked up a little Exide (XIDE) at $3.85 and US Geothermal (HTM) at $0.70) those opportunities were short-lived, and probably do not represent the market bottom for clean energy.

If the year continues to progress as I expect, the broad market will continue to decline, as will the clean energy sector. Individual clean energy stocks will likely continue to present excellent buying opportunities when the market as a whole has been declining rapidly. Buying opportunities in clean energy are likely to lead buying opportunities in the market as a whole, because the rapid decline of the whole clean energy sector over the last year is already producing great valuations. These great valuations broaden the appeal of clean energy stocks beyond the base of committed environmental investors, drawing in dyed-in-the-wool value investors who may not even think that Global Warming is happening, but know a good value stock when they see one.

I personally am still maintaining an overall short position in the market, but expect to be buying clean energy stocks with a focus on profitable micro-cap companies opportunistically.

Since these ten stocks have held up better than clean energy as a whole, we're liable to find fewer than average great buying opportunities in this list. C&D Technologies (CHP), currently trading at $0.95 is the best value I see among them at the moment, and this company may have already see its low for the year ($0.90 on June 10.)

One opportunity for short term gain may have just re-emerged in Portec Rail Products (PRPX). The company is the subject of a takeover bid from LB Foster (FSTR) which I covered in detail on June 1. The judge in a shareholder class action lawsuit lifted her earlier injunction blocking the merger on June 25th. The merger is not a done deal, however, since, as of May 28, only 59% of Portec shares had been tendered, and 65% are needed for the successful completion of the buyout. Foster may have to raise the offer price in order to consummate the deal.

Conclusion

At some point, I hope to be able to say it's time to buy this portfolio as a whole, but I think that time is not yet. Just the best strategy for the first six months of the year so far has been to stay in cash, and I think that will continue to be the best strategy for at least few more months. Now is still a time to remain mostly in cash, while keeping an eye out for individual buying opportunities.

DISCLOSURE: Long CHP, NFYIF, PRPX, WFIF, XIDE, HTM.

The information and views expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily those of RenewableEnergyWorld.com or the companies that advertise on its Web site and other publications.



--
Scott's Contracting
scottscontracting@gmail.com
http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.blogspot.com
http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.com
scotty@stlouisrenewableenergy.com

7.12.2010

Attention St Louis and Missouri Residents

Attention St Louis and Missouri Residents Please join us for the Gulf Voices event

An Exxon-Valdez every week.

That's the amount of oil that has been spilling into the Gulf. Yet already, news media coverage of the oil spill victims has faded -- and you know what that means. The motivation for our leaders to address our disastrous addiction to fossil fuels like oil is fading with it.

That's why on Wednesday, we're helping Gulf Coast residents come to St. Louis to share their stories. And we want to give you a chance to meet and speak with the very people who are living through the worst environmental disaster in our nation's history.

Please join us for the Gulf Voices event.

Schlafly Public Library (St. Louis, MO)
225 North Euclid Avenue
St. Louis, MO 63108

Wednesday, July 14, 2010
12:00 PM - 1:00 PM CDT

Click here to RSVP.

Linda Schuch from St. Petersburg, Florida shared her motivation for coming to Missouri and speaking:

"Between having a home on the water and opening a fish market that sells Gulf seafood, I have invested everything in our local environment. The disaster was my wakeup call to get off the side lines and try to work toward clean energy."

Linda's not alone. The thousands of stories like hers should be a wakeup call for America, but only if we help spread the word. Join us and don't forget to bring family and friends. Hear from Linda and others who have witnessed firsthand how America's dependence on oil and other fossil fuels hurts our economy, our environment and our way of life.

RSVP today: http://acp.repoweramerica.org/page/event/detail/repoweramericaevent/4v5z2

It's the human side of this tragedy and it's something you shouldn't miss.

Thanks,

Tracey Lewis
National Field Director
Repower America

--
Scott's Contracting
scottscontracting@gmail.com
http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.blogspot.com
http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.com
scotty@stlouisrenewableenergy.com

So-called "Climategate"

Hello:

Remember "Climategate?"  The so-called scandal where climate science deniers used stolen email messages to try to discredit forty years of established climate science?  The American press, led by the Wall Street Journal, ate it up -- playing right into the hands of the multimillion-dollar, fossil-fuel-funded climate denial industry. The Journal plastered sensationalist "Climategate" headlines everywhere and created doubt about well-proven scientific facts.

Last week, a third independent investigation exonerated the scientists involved and found that those emails contained no hidden conspiracy to fictionalize climate change. I just sent a letter to the editorial page of the Wall Street Journal demanding they set the record straight on climate change science.

Will you join me?

http://acp.climateprotect.org/climategate-taf

Thanks!

Climategate- Climate Change- Set the Record Straight

fromMaggie L. Fox, Alliance for Climate Protection <info@climateprotect.org>
to <scottscontracting@gmail.com>
dateMon, Jul 12, 2010 at 3:33 PM
subjectSet the record straight on so-called "Climategate"
mailed-bybounce.bluestatedigital.com

hide details 3:33 PM (2 hours ago)


Alliance for Climate Protection

Scotty,


Last week, a third independent investigation exonerated the climate scientists whose emails were hacked last fall -- finding the attacks lacked foundation. That's right: Three full, independent reviews have found no wrongdoing on the part of the scientists -- and most importantly, affirmed the scientific evidence of climate change.

So you might think that any reputable media outlet would feel compelled to set the record straight. But you'd be wrong.

In particular, the Wall Street Journal has published more than 30 editorials and op-eds on climate change since November of 2009. All took the stance that climate science was unreliable, dishonest or questionable -- or minimally unimportant. And unbelievably, just today, the Journal published another op-ed about the reviews, calling them a "whitewash" by "global warming alarmists."

Send a letter to the editor of the Wall Street Journal editorial page demanding that they set the record straight on climate change science.

It's vital that we receive balanced coverage from all of the media, and the Journal's actions matter. As Congress works to craft comprehensive policies to address our energy and climate crises, public understanding of this issue is more important than ever before.

A news outlet like the Wall Street Journal relies on its reputation as a balanced, unbiased news source. With your help, we can convince the Journal editorial page to give equal space to the fact that climate scientists have been exonerated and their findings remain affirmed.

Demand that the Wall Street Journal cover the facts about climate science.

Few news outlets in the U.S. are as well regarded and widely read among opinion makers and politicians as the Wall Street Journal. It has a responsibility to its readers and the American public to be fair and accurate on one of the most important issues of our time.

Balanced media coverage today won't give back the precious time we've lost defending scientific facts that should not have been in question. But perhaps it will remind our media outlets, including the Wall Street Journal, of their responsibility to the American people.

Thank you,

Maggie L. Fox
President and CEO
Alliance for Climate Protection

 
www.climateprotect.org

--
Scott's Contracting
scottscontracting@gmail.com
http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.blogspot.com
http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.com
scotty@stlouisrenewableenergy.com

Connect with Scotts Contracting

FB FB Twitter LinkedIn Blog Blog Blog Blog Pinterest

Featured Post

Perfect Aircrete, Kitchen Ingredients.