-- Scotts Contracting - StLouis Renewable Energy

Search This Blog

10.11.2010

7 Cities About to Sink

 

By Miriam B. Weiner

Many of us take for granted the notion that all of our beloved cities will be around for centuries to come. However, cities around the world seem to be vying for the title of "The Next Atlantis." Shaky foundations and encroaching seas are posing significant threats to some of the world's largest and most beloved cities. When planning your next vacation, keep in mind that some of the world's favorite destinations have a bit of a ticking clock on them. Here are seven major cities that are preparing to take the plunge.


#7: Bangkok, Thailand

Thailand's capital is sinking — and sinking fast. However, unlike other cities on our list, a shoddy foundation isn't necessarily to blame. Resting on the Chao Phraya River — which flows into the Bay of Bangkok about 30 miles south of the city center — this colossal settlement is more likely to drown than sink. Experts now say that this mouthwatering foodie destination — along with the dozens of beautiful temples found here — may be under water in as little as seven years.


According to Thai scientist Dr. Ajong Chumsai na Ayudhya, the fate of Bangkok can best be explained by global warming. Asia News Network reports that "Ajong said humans were mainly to blame for such disasters because they were using up natural resources, chopping down forests and kept emitting greenhouse gases with no regard for the future." Ajong also says that changes in the earth's overall climate will lead to more severe tsunamis in the Gulf of Thailand that will have extremely negative effects on the southern portion of the country. With less than a decade to spare, time might be running out for a trip to Thailand's most popular tourist getaway.


#6: New York City, New York

If you've never seen the Statue of Liberty or been dazzled by the lights of Times Square, now's the time. Much like its Thai comrade, America's most densely populated city is doomed to suffer the effects of global warming. Sitting at the mouth of the Hudson River where it flows into the Atlantic Ocean, this concrete jungle will soon be at a much higher risk of damage from rising sea levels and imposing tropical storms. And unlike the ones bobbing around in a barrel on Halloween, this Big Apple will not float.


Science Daily reports that the sea levels in the New York City area are expected to rise about twice as quickly as sea levels around the world, meaning that Gotham will take the plunge well before the rest of the United States. However, Science Daily says that flooding is just one of the symptoms New York will suffer: "The submersion of low-lying land, erosion of beaches, conversion of wetlands to open water and increase in the salinity of estuaries all can affect ecosystems and damage existing coastal development." Not only will the Empire City be transformed into a wading pool, but it will slowly be washed out to sea.


#5: Houston, Texas

Houston, we really do have a problem — soon, NASA's Visitor's Center won't only be stuck on Earth, but in it as well. The city that Fodor's deems is arguably Texas' most cosmopolitan is struggling to stay above ground. Built on a gold mine of natural resources and the determination to flourish, Space City has become a major energy hub and the taking-off point for U.S. space exploration. However, America's fourth-largest city was built on a foundation of sand. Literally.


Houston sits on the loosely packed banks of four major bayous that empty into the Gulf of Mexico. For years, residents of Houston relied on groundwater to fulfill their needs, but the mass amounts of extraction needed to supply the ever-expanding city weakened Houston's foothold. Oil extraction was also damaging to the foundation, as was continuous sprawl, not to mention the 300 or so active fault lines that run beneath Houston's streets and skyscrapers. Now, many parts of this metropolis — specifically Jersey Village to the northwest — are sinking by as much as two inches per year, according to Science Daily. Experts note that while sinking has slowed significantly in areas that have stopped extracting ground water, a permanent solution to Houston's problem has yet to be found. If Houston is on your list of cities to see, you best prepare soon for take-off.


#4: Shanghai, China

Things aren't looking good for Shanghai, either. Located on China's coast, this sprawling city was built on swamplands surrounding the mouth of the Yangze River. Originally a small fishing village, Shanghai began to draw more and more residents in the mid-19th century. Modest homes were replaced by breathtaking skyscrapers (not to mention some of the best shopping venues in Asia), and Shanghai soon became the most densely populated city in the world, housing over 20 million people by 2001. The city was handling rapid expansion just fine until the early 20th century, when wells became a major source of water and the underlying sediment deposit was disturbed. According to PBS, Shanghai sank roughly eight feet between 1921 and 1965, which equals about two inches per year. The city still continues to drop at a rate of about half an inch per year.


According to experts, not much can be done to keep Shanghai above ground — the city is simply too heavy for its foundation. However, in an effort to slow the sinking process, all new high-rise buildings must be built with deep concrete piles to help support their weight. If you have any interest in seeing the architecture for which Shanghai is both famous and floundering, don't wait too long.


#3: New Orleans, Louisiana

When colonists chose New Orleans as the capital of French Louisiana, they did so because of its inland locale. However, any land protection the city had has been washed away, making America's favorite place to celebrate (approximately half of which sits at or below sea level) even more prone to tropical storms.


It wasn't until after Hurricane Katrina that experts really took note of New Orleans' downhill situation. In 2006, National Geographic reported that the city sank about a quarter of an inch per year in the years leading up to Hurricane Katrina, while the levees designed to protect the city from the Gulf sank at four or five times that rate, exacerbating the long-term effects of the storm. Experts say that not much can be done to save the Big Easy. According to a report issued in 2009 by the National Academy of Engineering and the National Research Council, "Levees and floodwalls surrounding New Orleans … cannot provide absolute protection against overtopping or failure in extreme events. … If relocation is not feasible, an alternative would be to elevate the first floor of buildings to at least the 100-year flood level." Just goes to show that there's never a time like the present to don your Mardi Gras mask and head south to Bourbon Street.


#2: Venice, Italy

It's been several hundred years since the Venetians decided to construct the towering St. Mark's Basilica and sprawling Piazza San Marco atop submerged wooden planks and forgo roads in favor of canals. Back in the day, the city's geography made sense: Direct access to the sea was necessary in order for Venitians to maintain control of commerce on the Mediterranean Sea. But the dig for fresh water proved to have a negative impact on this fish-shaped city: According to The Christian Science Monitor, Venice has sunk almost a foot over the past 100 years. To make things worse, water levels in the Mediterranean Sea are also rising. Although acqua alta (high water) has plagued this ornate tourist hotspot for centuries, flooding frequency has increased dramatically in recent years. Justin Demetri of LifeInItaly.com notes that Venice now experiences over 60 bouts of acqua alta each year.


Preserving Venice has been a priority of the Italian Government for about 30 years. Several billion euros have been dedicated to a flood defense system, the MOSE Project, which is expected to be completed in 2011 or 2012. However, some experts claim that the only way to save the city is to move it altogether. Either way, if you've always dreamed of a gondola ride through the Bride of the Sea, you had better do so soon with galoshes in tow.


#1: Mexico City, Mexico

Resting on a fickle lake bed in the Valley of Mexico, Mexico City has been facing the possibility of going under for centuries. However, according to geologists, there are parts of this massive metropolis that are sinking by as much as eight inches per year. Because of a lack of sufficient drainage, the city was heavily prone to flooding from groundwater flowing down from the surrounding mountains, leading to the construction of a vast underground drainage system. But over-extraction of groundwater from the Texcoco lake bed during the 20th century has caused the city's clay foundation to crumble, forcing the metropolis to sink deeper into the ground. And as the city sinks, so does the drainage system, forcing waste water to reverse its course and head back into the city. According to AZCentral.com, Mexico City's drainage capacity has decreased by 30 percent since 1975.


There are several projects underway to keep this sinking city afloat, including a 23-foot-wide ($1.1 billion) Eastern Drainage Tunnel that will deposit waste water about 40 miles north of the city. The tunnel should be completed by 2012. Work is also being done to help save the architectural gems — like the popular Metropolitan Cathedral — found in the Historic District, which are one of the city's major tourist draws. But despite best efforts, engineers say that there is no way to keep Mexico City from sinking.

--
Scott's Contracting
scottscontracting@gmail.com
http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.blogspot.com
http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.com
scotty@stlouisrenewableenergy.com

10.09.2010

Re: MegaVote: MO 3rd, 10/8/2010



On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 6:38 PM, <megavote@mailmanager.net> wrote:

presented by:
Solar Nation

October 8, 2010

In this MegaVote for Missouri's 3rd Congressional District:

Recent Congressional Votes

  • Senate: Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Reconciliation
  • Senate: Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act
  • Senate: Education Jobs and Medicaid Assistance Act
  • Senate: Nomination of Elena Kagan to the Supreme Court
  • Senate: 2011 Defense Authorization, Cloture
  • House: Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
  • House: Patrick Murphy of Pennsylvania Amendment; National Defense Authorization Act, FY2011
  • House: Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act
  • House: Education Jobs and Medicaid Assistance Act

    Editor's Note: This is a special pre-election edition of MegaVote, featuring some of the most-asked-about votes of 2010. The House is in recess and is expected to reconvene Monday, Nov. 15. The Senate is in a series of pro forma sessions over the next month and is expected to also return Nov. 15.

    Recent Senate Votes
    Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Reconciliation - Vote Passed (56-43, 1 Not Voting)

    The Senate passed the final version of a bill to overhaul the nation's health care system in March using a procedure known as reconciliation, which allows the Senate to bypass a filibuster with a simple majority. The bill mandates that individuals buy health insurance with exceptions for certain religious groups and those who cannot afford coverage. Those who do not buy insurance will be subject to a tax. Under the bill, beginning in 2014 insurance companies cannot deny coverage based on pre-existing medical conditions, and cannot drop coverage of people who become ill. In addition, a section of the bill makes the federal government the sole originator of student loans.

    Sen. Christopher Bond voted NO......send e-mail or see bio
    Sen. Claire McCaskill voted YES......send e-mail or see bio


    Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act - Vote Agreed to (60-39)

    The Senate passed the final version of the financial regulation reform legislation in July. The bill creates new regulatory procedures to assess risks posed by large financial institutions and facilitate the orderly dissolution of failing firms that pose a threat to the economy. It will also create a new federal agency to oversee consumer financial products, bring the derivatives market under significant federal regulation and give shareholders and regulators greater say on executive pay.

    Sen. Christopher Bond voted NO......send e-mail or see bio
    Sen. Claire McCaskill voted YES......send e-mail or see bio


    Education Jobs and Medicaid Assistance Act - Vote Agreed to (61-39)

    The Senate passed this bill in August to provide $16.1 billion to extend increased Medicaid assistance to states and $10 billion in funding for states to create or retain teachers' jobs. The cost of the programs will be offset by changing foreign tax provisions, ending increased food stamp benefits beginning in April 2014 and rescinding previously enacted spending.

    Sen. Christopher Bond voted NO......send e-mail or see bio
    Sen. Claire McCaskill voted YES......send e-mail or see bio


    Nomination of Elena Kagan to the Supreme Court - Vote Confirmed (63-37)

    The Senate confirmed Elena Kagan to be an Associate Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court in August. The former dean of Harvard Law School, Kagan had served as Obama's solicitor general since March of 2009 and was the first woman to hold the position. She replaced Justice John Paul Stevens, who had been appointed by President Gerald Ford in 1975.

    Sen. Christopher Bond voted NO......send e-mail or see bio
    Sen. Claire McCaskill voted YES......send e-mail or see bio


    2011 Defense Authorization, Cloture - Vote Rejected (56-43, 1 Not Voting)

    The Senate rejected this attempt to end debate on the 2011 Defense spending bill, which would authorize $725.7 billion in discretionary funding for defense programs. The bill would have also repealed a 1993 law that codified the "don't ask, don't tell" policy banning military service by openly gay men and women.

    Sen. Christopher Bond voted NO......send e-mail or see bio
    Sen. Claire McCaskill voted YES......send e-mail or see bio


    Recent House Votes
    Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act - Vote Passed (219-212)

    In March, the House passed this bill, which would overhaul the nation's health insurance system and require most individuals to buy health insurance by 2014.

    Rep. Russ Carnahan voted YES......send e-mail or see bio


    Patrick Murphy of Pennsylvania Amendment; National Defense Authorization Act, FY2011 - Vote Agreed to (234-194, 10 Not Voting)

    During the defense authorization bill debate in May, the House adopted this amendment that would repeal the "don't ask, don't tell" law that prohibits openly gay men and women from serving in the military.

    Rep. Russ Carnahan voted YES......send e-mail or see bio


    Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act - Vote Passed (237-192, 4 Not Voting)

    The House passed the final version of the financial regulation reform legislation in June.

    Rep. Russ Carnahan voted YES......send e-mail or see bio


    Education Jobs and Medicaid Assistance Act - Vote Passed (247-161, 25 Not Voting)

    In August, the House passed this bill to provide $16.1 billion to extend increased Medicaid assistance to states and $10 billion in funding for states to create or retain teachers' jobs.

    Rep. Russ Carnahan voted YES......send e-mail or see bio





    --
    Scott's Contracting
    scottscontracting@gmail.com
    http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.blogspot.com
    http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.com
    scotty@stlouisrenewableenergy.com

    USA vs China in Slow Climate Change Talks

    US, China blame each other for slow climate talks

    AP

    TIANJIN, China – Modest progress at U.N. climate talks Saturday was overshadowed by a continuing deadlock between China and the United States, clouding prospects for a major climate conference in Mexico in less than two months' time.

    Marred by an atmosphere of mistrust, negotiations have made limited headway as the world's two largest emitters of greenhouse gases blamed each other for holding up talks.

    Chief U.S. negotiator Jonathan Pershing said he was disappointed by the resistance of China and other developing nations to a major issue: allowing the monitoring and verification of their efforts to curb the greenhouse gas emissions that are blamed for global warming.

    "We have made very little progress on the key issue that confronts us," he said. "These elements are a part of the deal. The lack of progress on these gives us concern about the prospects for Cancun."

    Meanwhile his Chinese counterpart, Su Wei, hit back, charging developed countries with failing to commit to substantial reductions in carbon emissions while making unfair demands of developing nations. He accused the U.S. of using the transparency issue to avoid its own responsibilities to cut emissions and provide financing and technology to poor countries.

     [Scotty Notes: Why is the USA footing the bill alone in the Climate Change Issue?]

    "After five years of negotiation, we have seen slow or no progress. The developed countries are trying every means possible to avoid discussion of the essential issue — that is emission reductions," he said.

    The public rift over long-standing divisions between rich and poor nations threatens to jeopardize the possibility of progress at the Cancun meeting.

    Delegates from more than 150 nations have been negotiating in China's northeastern city of Tianjin for the past week, working to lay the groundwork for the meeting in Mexico that starts Nov. 29.

    The U.N. talks aim to secure a binding deal to curb greenhouse gases that cause global warming, but countries disagree on how to split the burden of emission cuts and how to verify them. The talks are intended to find a replacement for the Kyoto Protocol, which legally mandated modest emissions reductions and expires in 2012.

    Since a binding global deal is largely out of reach for this year's meeting, negotiators have been focusing on less contentious initiatives that can lay the foundation for a legal framework that could be approved later, possibly in South Africa in 2011.

    On their final day of talks, negotiators said modest progress had been made on establishing a climate fund to help poor nations, drawing up guidelines on sharing technology and deforestation issues, but expressed frustration at the overall gridlock.

    "We have over the last week seen some progress but progress was slow and uneven," said EU negotiator Peter Wittoeck. "We think that a big effort will still be needed to crystallize options ... in Cancun.

    Environmental groups were divided in their assessment of the week's talks, with many openly criticizing the bickering and posturing that characterized negotiations.

    "At times, it has been like watching children in a kindergarten," said Wendel Trio, international climate policy director with Greenpeace.

    However, others were less pessimistic, arguing that the detailed work of putting together draft proposals for Cancun has moved forward.

    "We have heard of a lot of division and argument, but much of that has been performance and part of the negotiations here. Behind the scenes, they have been getting down to work this week," said Julie-Ann Richards of Climate Action Network.

    Expectations had not been high coming into these negotiations, but U.N. climate chief Christiana Figueres said that despite disagreements, progress had been made in Tianjin.

    "This week has got us closer to a structured set of decisions that can be agreed to in Cancun. Governments addressed what is doable in Cancun, and what may have to be left to later," she said.

    Last year's U.N. climate summit in Copenhagen disappointed many environmentalists and political leaders when it failed to produce a legally binding treaty on curbing the greenhouse gases.

    Scientists have warned that global warming could lead to widespread drought, floods, higher sea levels and worsening storms. Even a 3.6-degree-Fahrenheit (2-degree-Celsius) temperature rise could subject up to 2 billion people to water shortages by 2050, a U.N. panel has said.

    ___

    Associated Press Writer Joe McDonald contributed to this report.

    --
    Scott's Contracting
    scottscontracting@gmail.com
    http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.blogspot.com
    http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.com
    scotty@stlouisrenewableenergy.com

    10.08.2010

    Naperville Ill Solar Electricity Project

    SOLAR PANELS INSTALLED AT NAPERVILLE'S FORT HILL ELECTRIC SUBSTATION



    US State News
    October 2, 2010

    NAPERVILLE, Ill., Oct. 1 -- The City of Naperville issued the following news release:

    The City of Naperville is pleased to announce that the Department of Public Utilities-Electric (DPU-E) has expanded its use of renewable energy by adding solar power to one of its substations. DPU-E, along with solar project developer SoCore Energy of Chicago, has installed 25 solar photovoltaic panels at the Fort Hill Electric Substation, located near the intersection of 75th Street and Fort Hill Drive.

    The array will generate solar energy to offset the substation building's energy requirements and was donated and installed by SoCore Energy. This project will build public awareness and knowledge of solar power and help promote renewable energy sources in the community.

    "Naperville's residents are energy conscious, and our utility customers have expressed an interest in ways they can conserve energy," Director of Public Utilities-Electric Mark Curran said. "We are pleased to be able to promote renewable energy to our customers and help show them possible ways to reduce their carbon footprint."

    The solar panels' estimated yearly energy production is 4,500 kWh, and residents and interested parties can visit the city's website to see the amount of energy the solar panels are producing in real-time. The panels have currently produced 2.2 MWh, or the equivalent of powering 6,816 light bulbs and 2,249 computers for one day since being installed in April of this year. The carbon offset of 3,856.9 pounds by the panels has contributed the equivalent of 45 trees planted and 199 gallons of gas. To view these figures and for more information, visit www.naperville.il.us/solarpower.aspx.

    These panels will also be used as a tool for teaching local students about alternative energy sources, energy conservation methods and the economics of energy demand and consumption. In addition, this project will build upon Naperville's ENERGY STAR partnership that began in April 2009.

    Renewable Energy systems, such as wind turbines and solar panels, are relatively new trends, and the city's existing zoning ordinance does not directly address their installation and maintenance. In an effort to provide guidelines for installation of these types of renewable energy systems, the City of Naperville has undertaken proposed zoning amendments related to wind and solar energy. The Small Wind and Solar Renewable Energy Ordinance is scheduled for public hearing again before the Plan Commission on Wednesday, October 6 and is anticipated to go before the City Council later this year. Anyone interested in learning more about this proposed ordinance should visit www.naperville.il.us/renewableenergy.aspx.

    For more information on the City of Naperville's environmental initiatives, visit www.naperville.il.us/environment.aspx. Sign up to receive Green e-News for periodic updates on Naperville's environmental initiatives at www.naperville.il.us/enews.aspx. For any query with respect to this article or any other content requirement, please contact Editor at htsyndication@hindustantimes.com

    Copyright 2010 HT Media Ltd.All Rights Reserved
    US State News

    --
    Scott's Contracting
    scottscontracting@gmail.com
    http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.blogspot.com
    http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.com
    scotty@stlouisrenewableenergy.com

    Connect with Scotts Contracting

    FB FB Twitter LinkedIn Blog Blog Blog Blog Pinterest

    Featured Post

    Perfect Aircrete, Kitchen Ingredients.