Adobe Creative Suite 5 Master Collection for MAC Download Price: $259.95 Adobe Creative Suite 5 Web Premium for MAC Download Price: $199.95 Adobe Creative Suite 5 Design Premium for MAC Download Price: $179.95 Adobe Photoshop CS5 Extended for MAC Download Price: $69.95 Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 3 for MAC Download Price: $69.95 Adobe Dreamweaver CS5 for MAC Download Price: $69.95 Adobe Creative Suite 4 Master Collection for MAC Download Price: $199.95 Adobe Creative Suite 4 Design Premium for MAC Download Price: $159.95 Adobe Photoshop CS4 Extended for MAC Download Price: $59.95 Logic Studio 9 Full Pack with Content Download Price: $149.95 Adobe Acrobat 9 Pro for MAC Download Price: $59.95 Microsoft Office 2008 Standart Edition for Mac Download Price: $119.95 StuffIt Deluxe 2009 for MAC Download Price: $39.95 Roxio Toast 10 Titanium Pro for MAC Download Price: $59.95 Mac OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard Download Price: $29.95 Aperture 3 for MAC Download Price: $79.95 Quark XPress 8 for MAC Download Price: $149.95 Parallels Desktop 5 Download Price: $39.95 Mac OS X v10.5.6 Leopard Download Price: $69.95 FileMaker Pro 11 Advanced for MAC Download Price: $99.95 | Quick MACINTOSH store: ABBYY AceReader activata Adobe Macromedia Any-video-converter apimac app4mac Apple Macintosh Aquafadas Avid CD-DVD Software code line Creativebe FabFilter FileMaker GAMES Hardcoded Software IK Multimedia Intuit Quicken Ironic iSkysoft JS8 Media jumsoft KavaSoft Koingo limit-point Lynda Training Mariner Maxon Cinema for MAC McAfee Anti-virus mesadynamics Metaobject Microsoft for MAC Native Instruments Navicat Office software Other Photo and Graphic Editors positiveteam publicspace Quark XPress Re:VisionEffects realmacsoftware red sweater Rogue Amoeba ronimusic Roxio Smileonmymac thelittleappfactory Topaz Utilites and Programming Video and Audio Editors VMware zapptek | NEWLY ADDED SOFTWARE R3cover for MAC Quicken Essentials for MAC Punakea for MAC ProPresenter for MAC Photomatix Pro for MAC Photo Mechanic for MAC OmniOutliner Pro for MAC Photo to movie for MAC |
10.20.2010
Hacker Warning: Blog Hackers, Company Posing as Legit Company are really hackers
Web Blog Hackers-
Scotty writes: The Web Site that posted this information is posing as Scotty. http://souperdonsone.com/support/ is run by computer hackers. they have hacked this site. Rather than remove the content I'm using it as a warning to everyone.
I will be postings additional details as they become available. build green, Scotty
Scotty writes: The Web Site that posted this information is posing as Scotty. http://souperdonsone.com/support/ is run by computer hackers. they have hacked this site. Rather than remove the content I'm using it as a warning to everyone.
Scotty writes: The Web Site that posted this information is posing as Scotty. http://souperdonsone.com/support/ is run by computer hackers. they have hacked this site. Rather than remove the content I'm using it as a warning to everyone.
I will be postings additional details as they become available. build green, Scotty
Scotty writes: The Web Site that posted this information is posing as Scotty. http://souperdonsone.com/support/ is run by computer hackers. they have hacked this site. Rather than remove the content I'm using it as a warning to everyone.
Scotty writes: The Web Site that posted this information is posing as Scotty. http://souperdonsone.com/support/ is run by computer hackers. they have hacked this site. Rather than remove the content I'm using it as a warning to everyone.
Scotty writes: This site that posted this information is posing as Scotty. http://souperdonsone.com/support/ is run by computer hackers. they have hacked this site. Rather than remove the content I'm using it as a warning to everyone. I will be postings additional details as they become available. build green, Scotty | ||
Scotty writes: The Web Site that posted this information is posing as Scotty. http://souperdonsone.com/support/ is run by computer hackers. they have hacked this site. Rather than remove the content I'm using it as a warning to everyone. Adobe Creative Suite 5 Master Collection for MAC Download Price: $259.95 Adobe Creative Suite 5 Web Premium for MAC Download Price: $199.95 Scotty writes: The Web Site that posted this information is posing as Scotty. http://souperdonsone.com/support/ is run by computer hackers. they have hacked this site. Rather than remove the content I'm using it as a warning to everyone. Adobe Creative Suite 5 Design Premium for MAC Download Price: $179.95 Scotty writes: The Web Site that posted this information is posing as Scotty. http://souperdonsone.com/support/ is run by computer hackers. they have hacked this site. Rather than remove the content I'm using it as a warning to everyone. Adobe Photoshop CS5 Extended for MAC Download Price: $69.95 Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 3 for MAC Download Price: $69.95 Adobe Dreamweaver CS5 for MAC Download Price: $69.95 Adobe Creative Suite 4 Master Collection for MAC Download Price: $199.95 Adobe Creative Suite 4 Design Premium for MAC Download Price: $159.95 Adobe Photoshop CS4 Extended for MAC Download Price: $59.95 Logic Studio 9 Full Pack with Content Download Price: $149.95 Adobe Acrobat 9 Pro for MAC Download Price: $59.95 Microsoft Office 2008 Standart Edition for Mac Download Price: $119.95 StuffIt Deluxe 2009 for MAC Download Price: $39.95 Roxio Toast 10 Titanium Pro for MAC Download Price: $59.95 Mac OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard Download Price: $29.95 Aperture 3 for MAC Download Price: $79.95 Quark XPress 8 for MAC Download Price: $149.95 Parallels Desktop 5 Download Price: $39.95 Mac OS X v10.5.6 Leopard Download Price: $69.95 Scotty writes: The Web Site that posted this information is posing as Scotty. http://souperdonsone.com/support/ is run by computer hackers. they have hacked this site. Rather than remove the content I'm using it as a warning to everyone. FileMaker Pro 11 Advanced for MAC Download Price: $99.95 | Quick MACINTOSH store: ABBYY AceReader activata Adobe Macromedia Any-video-converter apimac app4mac Apple Macintosh Aquafadas Avid CD-DVD Software code line Creativebe FabFilter FileMaker GAMES Hardcoded Software IK Multimedia Intuit Quicken Ironic iSkysoft JS8 Media jumsoft KavaSoft Koingo limit-point Lynda Training Mariner Maxon Cinema for MACScotty writes: The Web Site that posted this information is posing as Scotty. http://souperdonsone.com/support/ is run by computer hackers. they have hacked this site. Rather than remove the content I'm using it as a warning to everyone. McAfee Anti-virus mesadynamics Metaobject Microsoft for MAC Native Instruments Navicat Office software Other Photo and Graphic Editors positiveteam publicspace Quark XPress Re:VisionEffects realmacsoftware red sweater Rogue Amoeba ronimusic RoxioScotty writes: The Web Site that posted this information is posing as Scotty. http://souperdonsone.com/support/ is run by computer hackers. they have hacked this site. Rather than remove the content I'm using it as a warning to everyone. Smileonmymac thelittleappfactory Topaz Utilites and Programming Video and Audio Editors VMware zaScotty writes: The Web Site that posted this information is posing as Scotty. http://souperdonsone.com/support/ is run by computer hackers. they have hacked this site. Rather than remove the content I'm using it as a warning to everyone.pptek Scotty writes: The Web Site that posted this information is posing as Scotty. http://souperdonsone.com/support/ is run by computer hackers. they have hacked this site. Rather than remove the content I'm using it as a warning to everyone. | NEWLY ADDED SOFTWARE R3cover for MAC Quicken Essentials for MAC Punakea for MAC ProPresenter for MAC Photomatix Pro for MAC Photo Mechanic for MAC OmniOutliner Pro for MAC Photo to movie for MAC |
Scotty writes: The Web Site that posted this information is posing as Scotty. http://souperdonsone.com/support/ is run by computer hackers. they have hacked this site. Rather than remove the content I'm using it as a warning to everyone. | Scotty writes: The Web Site that posted this information is posing as Scotty. http://souperdonsone.com/support/ is run by computer hackers. they have hacked this site. Rather than remove the content I'm using it as a warning to everyone. | Scotty writes: The Web Site that posted this information is posing as Scotty. http://souperdonsone.com/support/ is run by computer hackers. they have hacked this site. Rather than remove the content I'm using it as a warning to everyone. |
10.19.2010
Solar and the Novermber Election- Political Issues vs Industry
Rhone Resch: An Industry, Not an Issue
By David Wagman, Chief Editor, Renewable Energy World North America magazine | October 13, 2010
Rhone Resch looks to the November mid-term elections and worries that renewable energy–and solar in particular–may be cast as a political issue and not recognized as the industry both have become.
Tulsa, OK, USA -- "Any time you are embraced by the administration it's a great thing, but opponents to the administration can make it work against you," said Resch, the 44-year-old president and CEO of the Solar Energy Industries Association. This Washington, D.C.-based trade group represents the interests of the solar energy industry. Resch said he expects the mid-term congressional elections to result in more of a numerical balance between Republicans and Democrats on Capitol Hill. But he also believes fewer opportunities will exist for Congress to pass aggressive legislative initiatives that benefit renewables.
The solar industry became something of a political target in August. That was when $1.5 billion was pulled from Department of Energy loan guarantee programs by lawmakers as they looked for money to fund a bill benefitting teachers and state health care programs.
"Basically, it came down to political pressure that forced the leadership in Congress to search broadly to pay for education and state-level health care programs," Resch said. Assurances have since come from the Speaker of the House, the Senate Majority Leader and the White House that money taken from renewable energy will be reallocated later. But in a conversation with The Interview, Resch expressed frustration that the Department of Energy may be taking too long to make loan guarantees available.
"It's been a slow, laborious process in a program with a short deadline," he said. As many as 80 loan guarantee applications for solar energy projects remain under review at DOE. One of the only solar-focused loan guarantees made to date–a $530 million guarantee to California-based Solyndra in March 2009–was actually an application related to a 2005-vintage program.
Resch said he believes that as loan guarantee applications are reviewed, DOE and the Office of Management and Budget have imposed requirements and standards far more onerous than anything private sector lenders might propose. Perhaps more troubling, project developers have received little guidance from DOE on how to modify their applications to speed up the review process.
"It's the Department of Energy; they should be able to tap into the greatest minds to get technology assurances," Resch said. "DOE is slow in getting the money out."
Resch grew up in Wilton, Conn. and got an early idea that the environment might be his career after his kindergarten teacher presented him with a "Class Environmentalist" award, most likely for efforts to protect bugs on the playground, he said. (In February 2010 this magazine and RenewbleEnergyWorld.com presented Resch with a Leadership Award for his more recent work on behalf of renewable energy.)
Resch attended the University of Michigan and holds an MPA in Management from Syracuse University's Maxwell School as well as a Master of Environmental Engineering from SUNY Syracuse. During the Clinton administration Resch served as program manager at the Environmental Protection Agency's Climate Protection Division and later worked for the Natural Gas Supply Association. At EPA he directed the Natural Gas STAR program, which encouraged oil and natural gas producers to voluntarily cut methane emissions that result from leaks and losses in pipelines, gas gathering and related processing facilities. His time working with an "adversary" industry helped him appreciate the benefits of looking for common ground and areas of cooperation across the energy industry.
He views the EPA as both the logical and the correct choice to pursue carbon and greenhouse gas regulation. He also sees the natural gas industry as potentially a strong ally for the solar industry.
On the first point, Resch said carbon dioxide emissions from the electric power industry presents a classic example of inefficiency that can and should be corrected through regulation. Fossil-fired generators may object to new regulations, but the long-term effects of regulation typically benefit the economy and the environment.
"EPA regulating carbon emissions is a very, very important first step to addressing global warming," he said.
When it comes to alliances with natural gas, Resch said the fossil fuel could be a good friend of renewable energy as perhaps 50 GW of coal-fired generation is retired in the coming years due to regulation and obsolescence. The natural gas industry expects an extended period of stable supply and prices as new, so-called unconventional resources are developed, primarily in tight sand and shale geologic formations across the Appalachians and into Texas. As these fields are exploited, opportunities will likely emerge to marry natural gas-fired peaking and intermediate-load plants with renewable sources such as solar photovoltaic and solar thermal to replace coal-based generation.
The combination of low natural gas prices, growth of utility-scale solar and interest in renewable energy among independent power producers signals the "beginning of a partnership" with natural gas, Resch said. At the same time, many utilities realize that solar energy can help them meet peak loads. After all, solar energy hits its maximum output around the same time of day that peak demand occurs. Solar energy has "huge value," Resch said, because it can help meet peak load while reducing the need to burn natural gas in peaking facilities. At the same time it can strengthen reliability, particularly if solar PV is distributed widely across a utility's service territory.
As state renewable portfolio standards evolve, Resch sees the need for mechanisms that create a distributed generation carve-out. Such mechanisms would create a solar renewable energy credit to send price signals. In east coast markets, for example, such credits already generate price signals that help justify more renewable energy investment in general and more solar in particular.
Unfortunately, Resch sees few of those same principles reflected in proposed federal renewable portfolio standards. "A straight 15 percent standard by 2020 doesn't benefit all technologies," he said.
Also inadequate–although appreci- ated–was the 30 percent tax credit for manufacturing included as part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, the popularly termed "stimulus bill" of 2009.
"It's great it was created but it's woefully inadequate" to support the U.S. solar manufacturing industry, Resch said. One reason is that in the competition for manufacturing jobs, Asian governments are proving to be more aggressive than almost any U.S. state or even the federal government. Where a manufacturer might receive a one-time tax credit to locate a solar technology operation in a state, foreign governments may offer incentives that include long-term tax holidays, free land, low-interest loans and workforce training.
Such incentives are largely "not matched" in the U.S., Resch said. In the coming years, he expects the cost of manufacturing to focus less on the cost of labor and more on the cost of transportation and the importance of access to markets. It's on those points that he sees U.S. companies having an advantage as the domestic solar energy market grows, perhaps even to lead the world within the next several years. Strengthening the prospects for manufacturers is the fact that solar energy comprises multiple technologies, everything from concentrating PV to building-integrated PV to solar thermal and hot water production.
"All have different applications and price points" as well as manufacturing opportunities, Resch said. Arizona, Oregon, North Carolina and Georgia have shown leadership in offering incentives to manufacturers. And Resch pointed to the $1 billion investment Dow Chemical announced last February it is making to build a manufacturing plant in Michigan for its shingle-integrated solar PV technology.
"To be honest, a lot of people poo-poohed solar," Resch said. That attitude is largely a thing of the past and states now view solar as an attractive industry both for manufacturing jobs and for clean energy.
In his six years as head of SEIA, Resch said his most satisfying accomplishment has been to help the industry speak with one voice and with a consistent message. He said the investment tax credit might not have been created without the industry working and speaking collectively when it went to Capitol Hill.
"It takes a few dozen years to get to know how the legislative process works," Resch said of working in the nation's capital. He acknowledged that it's a big challenge to work with companies and CEOs to keep them together and on message. "We've taken a fractured industry and brought it together to be a powerful voice in Washington D.C.," Resch said.
And–no small feat–to reach a point where solar energy may finally be seen as an industry and not merely as an issue.
--
Scott's Contracting
scottscontracting@gmail.com
http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.blogspot.com
http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.com
scotty@stlouisrenewableenergy.com
"Basically, it came down to political pressure that forced the leadership in Congress to search broadly to pay for education and state-level health care programs," Resch said. Assurances have since come from the Speaker of the House, the Senate Majority Leader and the White House that money taken from renewable energy will be reallocated later. But in a conversation with The Interview, Resch expressed frustration that the Department of Energy may be taking too long to make loan guarantees available.
"It's been a slow, laborious process in a program with a short deadline," he said. As many as 80 loan guarantee applications for solar energy projects remain under review at DOE. One of the only solar-focused loan guarantees made to date–a $530 million guarantee to California-based Solyndra in March 2009–was actually an application related to a 2005-vintage program.
Resch said he believes that as loan guarantee applications are reviewed, DOE and the Office of Management and Budget have imposed requirements and standards far more onerous than anything private sector lenders might propose. Perhaps more troubling, project developers have received little guidance from DOE on how to modify their applications to speed up the review process.
"It's the Department of Energy; they should be able to tap into the greatest minds to get technology assurances," Resch said. "DOE is slow in getting the money out."
Resch grew up in Wilton, Conn. and got an early idea that the environment might be his career after his kindergarten teacher presented him with a "Class Environmentalist" award, most likely for efforts to protect bugs on the playground, he said. (In February 2010 this magazine and RenewbleEnergyWorld.com presented Resch with a Leadership Award for his more recent work on behalf of renewable energy.)
Resch attended the University of Michigan and holds an MPA in Management from Syracuse University's Maxwell School as well as a Master of Environmental Engineering from SUNY Syracuse. During the Clinton administration Resch served as program manager at the Environmental Protection Agency's Climate Protection Division and later worked for the Natural Gas Supply Association. At EPA he directed the Natural Gas STAR program, which encouraged oil and natural gas producers to voluntarily cut methane emissions that result from leaks and losses in pipelines, gas gathering and related processing facilities. His time working with an "adversary" industry helped him appreciate the benefits of looking for common ground and areas of cooperation across the energy industry.
He views the EPA as both the logical and the correct choice to pursue carbon and greenhouse gas regulation. He also sees the natural gas industry as potentially a strong ally for the solar industry.
On the first point, Resch said carbon dioxide emissions from the electric power industry presents a classic example of inefficiency that can and should be corrected through regulation. Fossil-fired generators may object to new regulations, but the long-term effects of regulation typically benefit the economy and the environment.
"EPA regulating carbon emissions is a very, very important first step to addressing global warming," he said.
When it comes to alliances with natural gas, Resch said the fossil fuel could be a good friend of renewable energy as perhaps 50 GW of coal-fired generation is retired in the coming years due to regulation and obsolescence. The natural gas industry expects an extended period of stable supply and prices as new, so-called unconventional resources are developed, primarily in tight sand and shale geologic formations across the Appalachians and into Texas. As these fields are exploited, opportunities will likely emerge to marry natural gas-fired peaking and intermediate-load plants with renewable sources such as solar photovoltaic and solar thermal to replace coal-based generation.
The combination of low natural gas prices, growth of utility-scale solar and interest in renewable energy among independent power producers signals the "beginning of a partnership" with natural gas, Resch said. At the same time, many utilities realize that solar energy can help them meet peak loads. After all, solar energy hits its maximum output around the same time of day that peak demand occurs. Solar energy has "huge value," Resch said, because it can help meet peak load while reducing the need to burn natural gas in peaking facilities. At the same time it can strengthen reliability, particularly if solar PV is distributed widely across a utility's service territory.
As state renewable portfolio standards evolve, Resch sees the need for mechanisms that create a distributed generation carve-out. Such mechanisms would create a solar renewable energy credit to send price signals. In east coast markets, for example, such credits already generate price signals that help justify more renewable energy investment in general and more solar in particular.
Unfortunately, Resch sees few of those same principles reflected in proposed federal renewable portfolio standards. "A straight 15 percent standard by 2020 doesn't benefit all technologies," he said.
Also inadequate–although appreci- ated–was the 30 percent tax credit for manufacturing included as part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, the popularly termed "stimulus bill" of 2009.
"It's great it was created but it's woefully inadequate" to support the U.S. solar manufacturing industry, Resch said. One reason is that in the competition for manufacturing jobs, Asian governments are proving to be more aggressive than almost any U.S. state or even the federal government. Where a manufacturer might receive a one-time tax credit to locate a solar technology operation in a state, foreign governments may offer incentives that include long-term tax holidays, free land, low-interest loans and workforce training.
Such incentives are largely "not matched" in the U.S., Resch said. In the coming years, he expects the cost of manufacturing to focus less on the cost of labor and more on the cost of transportation and the importance of access to markets. It's on those points that he sees U.S. companies having an advantage as the domestic solar energy market grows, perhaps even to lead the world within the next several years. Strengthening the prospects for manufacturers is the fact that solar energy comprises multiple technologies, everything from concentrating PV to building-integrated PV to solar thermal and hot water production.
"All have different applications and price points" as well as manufacturing opportunities, Resch said. Arizona, Oregon, North Carolina and Georgia have shown leadership in offering incentives to manufacturers. And Resch pointed to the $1 billion investment Dow Chemical announced last February it is making to build a manufacturing plant in Michigan for its shingle-integrated solar PV technology.
"To be honest, a lot of people poo-poohed solar," Resch said. That attitude is largely a thing of the past and states now view solar as an attractive industry both for manufacturing jobs and for clean energy.
In his six years as head of SEIA, Resch said his most satisfying accomplishment has been to help the industry speak with one voice and with a consistent message. He said the investment tax credit might not have been created without the industry working and speaking collectively when it went to Capitol Hill.
"It takes a few dozen years to get to know how the legislative process works," Resch said of working in the nation's capital. He acknowledged that it's a big challenge to work with companies and CEOs to keep them together and on message. "We've taken a fractured industry and brought it together to be a powerful voice in Washington D.C.," Resch said.
And–no small feat–to reach a point where solar energy may finally be seen as an industry and not merely as an issue.
--
Scott's Contracting
scottscontracting@gmail.com
http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.blogspot.com
http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.com
scotty@stlouisrenewableenergy.com
2010 Snake Oil Awards- Vote Here
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 10:10 AM, Dave Boundy, Repower America <info@repoweramerica.org> wrote:
Dear Scotts Contracting,
Who was the dirtiest opponent of clean energy this year? I don't think it would be too hard to name at least a handful of big oil companies and professional polluters that lied and cheated to protect their billions in profits.
That's why Repower America is asking you to vote this fall for the worst offender of 2010.
The depths to which the fossil fuel companies and their cronies have sunk this past year are unprecedented. Corporate polluters have hijacked our democracy, devastated our environment, denied the science of climate change and made record profits doing it.
Who was the dirtiest opponent of clean energy this year? Nominate a fossil fuel company for the 2010 Snake Oil Award and make sure it gets the recognition that is truly deserved.
The nomination period begins today and remains open until midnight on Friday, October 22. Our slate of nominees will be announced November 1, and after supporters like you cast your vote, the "winner" will receive our first annual Snake Oil Award.
It's up to you to decide who's the worst of the worst:Submit your nominee for the 2010 Snake Oil Awards.
- Is it Massey Energy and CEO Dan Blankenship for the way they handled the Upper Big Branch mine disaster in West Virginia last April?
- Or how about Koch Industries, led by brothers Charles and David Koch, for polluting our planet and bankrolling countless climate deniers using shadowy front groups?
- And let's not forget this year's critical darling BP for devastating the Gulf Coast with the worst offshore oil spill in history, hampering the investigation and sending their CEO Tony Hayward off in a golden parachute.
When climate activists come together and speak out, snake oil salesmen have nowhere to hide. Get involved today and help shine a spotlight on the biggest disgrace of 2010.
Thanks for getting involved,
Dave Boundy
Campaign Manager
Repower America
![]()
--
Scott's Contracting
scottscontracting@gmail.com
http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.blogspot.com
http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.com
scotty@stlouisrenewableenergy.com
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
Featured Post
-
Coalition for the Environment flat out opposes second nuclear plant | More ...
-
Join us on an extraordinary journey as two lifelong friends, Francis and Benoit, turn a crumbling, centuries-old castle into a stunning 4-st...
-
Thank You for stopping by the Green Blog. If additional information in needed or you have a question let me know by posting a question or ...
