-- Scotts Contracting - StLouis Renewable Energy

Search This Blog

11.29.2010

Is Climate Change Too Scary?

Doom and gloom doesn't motivate action on environmental problems, but is there hope for behavior change? David Biello reports

November 28, 2010


When it comes to persuasion, doom and gloom doesn't work. If that wasn't clear from the morass that is international climate change negotiations starting this week or the constant reports of extinction of plant and animal species worldwide, new research [pdf] from the University of California, Berkeley shows it's so.

The researchers canvassed 97 Berkeley students, and found that the 25 young men and 72 young women largely believed in a so-called "just world." That means they think the world is generally just, orderly and stable—despite appearances to the contrary.


Those students who then read warnings of the apocalyptic potential of climate change were more likely to be skeptical of man-made global warming than those who read an article focusing on potential solutions. Dire warnings actually spurred climate contrarianism.


Of course, apocalypse isn't the only way climate change gets presented. But understanding how to motivate actual behavior change is as important—if not more important—than breakthroughs in energy technology. It's shifting away from gadget lust, car envy and the disposable society that might actually reverse some of the gloomiest environmental trends.

And the key will not be making bad decisions scary. It's making good decisions easy. 

—David Biello



--
Scott's Contracting
scottscontracting@gmail.com
http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.blogspot.com
http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.com
scotty@stlouisrenewableenergy.com

Season of the lame ducks

Washington Democrats have good reasons to be bummed out. They lost the national debate, at least in the minds of many. Some House Dems lost their re-election bids. Many lost friends to the electoral battles.

Democrats have had to watch Republicans strut their new power. The GOP won't have a majority until January, but they still managed this week to stop an extension of unemployment benefits.

In the House, moving from the majority to the minority is a dizzying change in orientation. The more powerful you were in the majority, the harder it is to go from leader to opposition. And the members of the Massachusetts delegation have been especially powerful.

Rep. Barney Frank of Newton, for example, is about to hand over the House Financial Services Committee to the Republicans. He'll have to go from being the author of major changes in the nation's financial industry back to being a sidelines critic and parliamentary speed bump.

Rep. Richard Neal has been waging a campaign since last spring to get his fellow Democrats to win the Ways & Means Committee chairmanship long held by embattled Rep. Charlie Rangel. Now he's running for ranking minority member on the committee. It's still a powerful position, but it isn't the same as chairman.

Then there's Rep. Ed Markey, who has used his power as chairman of the Energy and Environment Subcommittee to shovel alternative energy subsidies to his district and insert himself into big stories like the BP oil spill. Among the Republicans jockeying to succeed him is Joe Barton, the Texas Republican who publicly apologized to BP for Obama administration efforts to make the company pay for the damage it did along the Gulf Coast.

Markey has special reasons to be frustrated. He labored for years to get enough support for his "cap and trade" bill to make it through the House, only to see it stalled in the Senate. The Select Committee on Energy Independence and Climate Change, which Markey chaired, will probably be dissolved by the next House speaker.

The Democrats put their game faces on and promise to persevere. Markey says he expects to continue working with Barton on Internet privacy issues. In a National Review story published Friday, Rep. Fred Upton, another GOP candidate to chair the Energy and Commerce Committee, named Markey as one of the Democrats he could work with on legislation.

Neal is still pushing his plan for the Bush tax cuts due to expire at the end of the year. He wants to continue the lower rates for families earning less than $500,000 a year — Obama and Pelosi set the bar at $250,000 — and rebrand the new taxes on upper-income earners the "war tax," reserved to pay off the debt accumulated to pay for the war in Iraq.

Whether attempts at bipartisanship hold any prospects of success is anyone's guess.

Boehner and other GOP leaders had been invited to the White House Thursday to meet with President Obama for the first time since the election, mostly just to break the ice, but Boehner asked the visit be postponed until Nov. 30. He may not be sure whether to strike a pose of cooperation or confrontation. Or maybe, with fire-breathing tea partiers threatening a primary challenge for Republicans caught fraternizing with the enemy, the speaker-in-waiting wasn't sure he wanted to be seen shaking hands with the president.

On the Democratic side, the danger is premature capitulation. The refrain from the conservative media — which includes much of the mainstream press — is that voters "sent a message" on Election Day, and that Obama and Democrats must hear that message and moderate their positions in response.

That kind of thinking leaves Rep. Jim McGovern scratching his head. He beat his opponent, tea party Republican Marty Lamb, by 17 points. The idea that he should change his positions so he can represent the people who voted against him rather than those who voted for him is just absurd.

McGovern said his Democratic colleagues don't regret voting for health care reform — which, post-election polls show, is still favored by more than half the voters. They mostly blame their election losses on the economy.

They are wrong, and they will be doubly wrong if they think they can just wait until the economy turns their party's fortunes around. Democrats lost their House majority because they let their legislative accomplishments — an impressive list by historical standards — be distorted and demagogued by their critics.

House Democrats must do more than obstruct the Republican agenda. They must offer clear, simple alternatives to GOP proposals, especially on Republican priorities like the deficit, and force Boehner and the gang to negotiate with them.

It's time for Democrats to stop feeling sorry for themselves. There's work to be done.

Rick Holmes, opinion editor of the MetroWest Daily News, blogs at Holmes & Co. He can be reached at rholmes@cnc.com.



--
Scott's Contracting
scottscontracting@gmail.com
http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.blogspot.com
http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.com
scotty@stlouisrenewableenergy.com

Truth in Advertising: What Does 'Green' Really Mean?

Posted 7:00 AM 11/28/10 , ,

See full article from DailyFinance: http://srph.it/fGr6JB


What exactly does it mean when a company, service or product goes "green"? Sometimes a lot, sometimes very little. The term has invaded thousands of press releases, advertisements and product labels, rightfully winning it the top spot on at least one list of the most overused buzzwords last year.

That didn't make the term any less trendy this year: There's a dumpster-full of recent news stories regarding industries and corporations presenting "green solutions."

The Philadelphia Eagles just announced their football stadium will be adding solar panels and wind turbines to its exterior, in an effort to generate about 30% of the energy Lincoln Financial Field uses while saving tens of millions of dollars. Toy-maker Hasbro says it will stop using wire ties next year, while ensuring up to 75% of its packaging comes from recycled materials, as part of its "commitment to sustainability." The magazine Constructech, quoting government reports, says new federal codes will soon require greater energy efficiency in residential and commercial buildings.

And at Denver International Airport, you can now park your car at what the CEO of Propark America calls the greenest parking lot in the world. According to the Denver Post, the new facility uses alternative energy sources not only for lighting and heating, but also to supply power to recharging stations for electric-powered vehicles.

Where Green is Really Gray

Of course, the term "green" implies environmental responsibility, the concept of using less energy and resources while creating less pollution and perhaps reducing your "carbon footprint" (another phrase on the overused list).

There can be a large gray area, however, when it comes to defining what a business really means by "green". A recent study by the environmental marketing and consulting firm TerraChoice found misleading information on 95% of consumer products that made claims to being green.

"There's this terminology now in marketing called greenwashing," says Dr. Bruce Hutton, professor of business ethics and legal studies at the University of Denver's Daniels College of Business. "Companies...using the concept of being green and environmentally friendly to sell products when, in fact, they might not be all that environmentally friendly."

Greenwashing doesn't have to involve outright lies. For example, a company may truthfully say that it uses organic, home-grown cotton. But if takes large amounts of water to process that cotton – and flies the material halfway around the world to process it – that company's claim of being "green" may ring hollow.

Greenwashing's Silver Lining

Dr. Hutton thinks greenwashing might have a silver lining. After all, it wouldn't be happening if consumers weren't already interested in preserving the environment. The greenwashers, he says, "wouldn't go to the trouble of trying to brand something, even if the branding is under false pretenses, if they didn't understand that there's a shift going on in the consumer movement."

And that shift appears to be growing rapidly. The 2010 TerraChoice study found 73% more "green" products in U.S. and Canadian markets, compared to last year.

Dr. Hutton also points to studies of how people chose between various products and brands. After looking at price, quality and availability, he says, consumers also consider a company's reputation on issues such as social responsibility -- including sustainability and the environment.

"The environmental issues that we face, with things like water, aren't trendy, " he says. "Those issues aren't arguable, so they're not going to go away. People are starting to care about this stuff. But they won't care about it forever if they think they're getting screwed. Sooner or later consumers figure out [if certain marketing is] some kind of a ploy, that's really not helping the environment and maybe costing them more money, and [those companies] will lose the trust of consumers on issues that are about the environment."


See full article from DailyFinance: http://srph.it/fGr6JB


--
Scott's Contracting
scottscontracting@gmail.com
http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.blogspot.com
http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.com
scotty@stlouisrenewableenergy.com

11.28.2010

If You Knew How Dangerous Green Cleaning Products Were, You'd Probably Go Back to Soap and Water

  under your sink, deep in the basement and out in your garage. And they pose a real threat to your health

ENVIRONMENT  

If You Knew How Dangerous Green Cleaning Products Were, You'd Probably Go Back to Soap and Water



They're hiding under your sink, deep in the basement and out in your garage. They seem to be multiplying and most of them are green, for gosh sakes!

They are cleaning products. We have one for every conceivable job: floors, walls, dishes, laundry, windows, bathroom porcelain and ceramic tiles, wooden decks, cement surfaces, silverware, one for car paint and another for the chrome, and on and on.

Whatever happened to just plain soap? Well, it seems it wasn't fast enough for our busy lives. And these new cleaners certainly are fast. Just spray and wipe or swish with a mop and the job is done.

If you want really fast general cleaning products, commercial ones like Formula 409, Simple Green and Windex clean faster than any soap and water could. This is because they contain small amounts, usually in the range of 2-6 percent, of some members of the most powerful grease-cutting class of chemicals known: the "glycol ethers."

Many people have heard of glycols, a class of chemicals used in antifreeze solutions in your car's radiator. Others may remember that ethers were used as anesthetics in the early 1900s. But the glycol ethers we will discuss are not at all like either glycols or ethers. Glycol ethers are in a class of their own.

Everyone has been exposed to the glycol ethers. You can't possibly have escaped. They are in paints, varnishes, stains, inks, brake fluids, perfumes, cosmetics, and, of course, a vast number of cleaning products. They mix with water and many water-based cleaners and paints contain them.

Heavy overexposure to the glycol ethers can cause Click Here to Continue

--
Scott's Contracting
scottscontracting@gmail.com
http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.blogspot.com
http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.com
scotty@stlouisrenewableenergy.com

Connect with Scotts Contracting

FB FB Twitter LinkedIn Blog Blog Blog Blog Pinterest

Featured Post

1 Hack To Eliminate Your A/C Power Bill This Summer!