-- Scotts Contracting - StLouis Renewable Energy

Search This Blog

9.20.2010

Spray Foam-Eco Conscious

Spray foam for the eco-conscious

  June 17th, 2009 in Blogs         
RYagid Rob Yagid , associate editor

Hardworking crops. The oil from soybeans, which is also being considered to create alternative forms of energy, is replacing the petroleum in some spray foams.
Hardworking crops. The oil from soybeans, which is also being considered to create alternative forms of energy, is replacing the petroleum in some spray foams.
Photo: BioBased Insulation


I've gotten a lot of good feedback on an article I wrote for FHB#204 on spray foam. Many folks were concerned about the environmental impact of the foam itself and its toxicity to the resources we're ultimately trying to conserve. Below, I'll share a little bit about the make-up of the foam and also describe what makes some foam "green". For those of you interested in learning more about the various players in the spray-foam market right now, see the source list from my article toward the bottom of my post. And, of course, feel free to comment if you have opinions on the performance of spray-foam or its greater environmental impact.

Spray foam is made of a two-part mixture. The A part is isocyanate, a petroleum-based chemical made by only a handful of companies in the world. The B part contains a catalyst, polyol resin, a surfactant, and a blowing agent.
Consuming fossil fuels to make products intended to conserve fossil fuels makes little sense to a lot of people. All spray foams contain a certain level of petroleum in their A component and in their B component. Manufacturers such as BioBased Insulation, Demilec, and Icynene have created more environmentally benign spray-foam products by reducing the amount of petroleum used in their B component. They replace a portion of the polyol resin, which makes up 20% to 30% of the B component, with a renewable resource such as soybean or castor-bean oil. Apex even has a sucrose-based polyol. Manufacturers say that the transition to bean oil or sucrose doesn't alter the look or the performance of open- or closed-cell foam in any way.
The amount of soybean, castor bean, or sucrose found in foam varies by manufacturer, so identifying the "greenest" foam might not be so easy. 

According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, only 7% of a spray-foam product needs to be made of a renewable resource to be labeled as a bio-based foam. This, of course, doesn't factor in the petroleum fueling the crop-cultivation process. I wonder how "green" these foams really are? Sure, they may be a bit more healthful than strictly petroleum based foams, but can manufacturers be doing more to produce a better spray foam product?
Although this is not a complete list of spray-foam manufacturers, it is representative of the larger national companies. For assistance in finding a spray-foam insulation contractor, visit the Spray Polyurethane Foam Alliance.
Apex Foam Industries     Fomo Products
BASF
                              Great Stuff
BioBased                        Icynene
CertainTeed                   NCFI
Chemical Design            Tiger Foam
Corbond                         Touch n' Seal
Demilec                          Urethane Soy Systems 
Foametix                        Versi-Foam Systems
Read the complete article...
Spray Foam: What Do You Really Know?
To get the full benefit of this superinsulation, you must understand the difference between open- and closed-cell foams, how they perform, and how they're installed
by Rob Yagid
Get   the PDF



--
Scott's Contracting
scottscontracting@gmail.com
http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.blogspot.com
http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.com
scotty@stlouisrenewableenergy.com

9.19.2010

Roy Blunt-Political News-Worst of Washington

Morris Comes Full Circle, Poorly


It's pretty amusing to read about Dick Morris' hackery on behalf of Roy Blunt at yesterday's 9/12 rally.  That Morris is campaigning on behalf of Blunt at all is incredible, considering his previous declaration that Blunt "deserve[s] to be thrown out of leadership" for abusing his public office to benefit his family. Recall this excerpt from Morris' November 2006 column in The Hill, Oust Boehner and Blunt:
By the same token, Rep. John Shadegg (R-Ariz.) also stands for principled politics and deserves the support of those who understand what hit them on Nov. 7. Not so of his opponent. Majority Whip Roy Blunt's (R-Mo.) wife, Abigail Perlman, and his son, Andrew, both lobby for Altria, which is the newly sanitized name for Philip Morris. If Blunt is limited to the standard congressional salary of $165,500, there is no reason why he shouldn't take care of his family finances by letting lobbying firms that represent this death-dealing industry hire his son.
Blunt and Boehner deserve to be thrown out of leadership.
Quite the about face, no? 
Second, Morris' hatred for Democrats is so strong -- and intellectual integrity so weak -- that he attacked Robin Carnahan for simply being the Secretary of State.  Never mind that Roy Blunt and Matt Blunt are former SOS's, and Blunt is featuring his SOS work in his U.S. Senate campaign. 
Republican Senate hopeful Roy Blunt was allowed on stage but was kept away from the microphone as one of the day's more well-known speakers — political strategist turned conservative commentator Dick Morris — offered a campaign pitch on his behalf.
Morris, though, did not seem well-versed in Blunt's biography.
Morris derided Blunt's Democratic opponent, Missouri Secretary of State Robin Carnahan, as being "named" to a position where "they don't do anything."
Both Blunt and his son previously served as Missouri secretary of state, an elected position.
"I think that all three of us — Matt Blunt, Robin Carnahan and I — would have some disagreement," Blunt said when asked about Morris' comments.
To summarize: Dick Morris says Roy Blunt is too corrupt to serve as a leader in Congress, but ought to represent Missouri in the U.S. Senate because being the Secretary of State is a fake job.   Makes sense to me. 
Image credit: edeldoug on Flickr

--
Scott's Contracting
scottscontracting@gmail.com

9.18.2010

5 Expensive (and Unexpected) Things That Can Happen to Your Home

5 Expensive (and Unexpected) Things That Can Happen to Your Home

by Tara Struyk
Saturday, September 11, 2010

provided by
investopedia_logo.jpg
For most people, a home is one of the most valuable assets they'll ever own. Unfortunately, there are some major perils that can befall a house and put a serious dent in the value of that asset. Many of these perils are much more insidious than a fire or natural disaster. Read on to learn about some of the most expensive damage that can occur in your home, how much it costs and how to avoid it.
More from Investopedia:

Home Renovations That Don't Pay

10 Ways to Increase the Value of Your Home

6 Questions to Ask Before Refinancing Your Mortgage
Foundation
If you have bowed basement walls, cracks in walls or floors or a tilting chimney, you may be aware that these are signs of a problem foundation. But many people don't realize that difficulty opening and closing doors and windows can also be early signs that your home is shifting. And whether you have a new home or an old one, foundation problems often require major repairs -- and a big cash outlay. According to the Concrete Network, a consumer website devoted to concrete services, foundation problems can be caused by the type of soil the house is built on, an improperly laid foundation or drainage problems. Whatever the cause, a bad foundation is bad news and, depending on the severity of the problem, can cost the homeowner well over $10,000.
[Click here to check home equity rates in your area.]
How to prevent it: Assuming your home was properly built, the most you can do to prevent problems in your foundation is to ensure that your home has proper drainage. This means that gutters and eavestroughs should be kept clear and in good repair, and your yard should be properly graded to ensure that water runs away from your house.
Mold
Unlike major water damage, such as that caused by flooding, minor or hidden water damage in your home, perhaps from a defective water pipe, hot water heater or window seal, can cause just as much damage -- and you may not notice it right away. Similarly, if your home suffered through a flood in the past and did not adequately dry out, mold can also thrive. (If you live in a flood-prone area, flood insurance is a must.)
A 2005 study by the National Resources Defense Council showed that New Orleans homes that had been flooded or were even near areas of flooding showed extremely high levels of mold spores that could pose health threats to residents, even in the homes that had been repaired and treated for mold. And the more humid the area in which you live, the harder it will be for you to get rid of mold and keep it from coming back. According to the Environmental Protection Agency, if the mold growth in your home is larger than 10 square feet or was caused by sewage or other contaminated water, it's time to call in a professional. Although home insurance may cover some of the costs depending on your policy, the cost of mold remediation is about $3,000 per wall, according to Environmental Solutions Group, an environmental management company that inspects homes for mold -- and that doesn't include the cost of replacing any mold-infected materials such as drywall, carpet or ceiling tiles.
How to prevent it: Mold can't grow without moisture, so it's important that you check for and fix any leaks in your home immediately, use fans in kitchens and bathrooms to vent moisture outside and clean up any mold growth immediately to prevent it from spreading.
[Things Plumbers Won't Tell You]
Water Damage
If your home isn't water tight, this isn't something you can ignore. Beyond the possibility of mold, long-term water damage can cause rot, which can lead to all kinds of expensive repairs to the structure of your home. It's difficult to estimate the cost of this type of repair, but it can easily run into the thousands depending on how much wood needs to be replaced and how intrusive the repairs are.
How to prevent it: Be vigilant about water damage in your home; if you find leaks or areas that tend to be damp, have them repaired before long-term damage occurs. If you find rotten wood in your home, repair the problem before it gets out of hand.
Bedbugs
If you're a homeowner rather than a renter, you may think you're immune to this one. Not so. According to Bloomberg, a recent nationwide infestation of bedbugs has seen the little blood-sucking critters popping up all over the place -- including movie theaters, office buildings and hotels, making it very easy for anyone to bring the infestation home. And, because many of the most effective chemicals for killing bedbugs have been found to be dangerous, eliminating the spread is harder than ever. According to a July 2009 story in the New York Times, paying more than $5,000 to eliminate a bedbug infestation is not uncommon.
How to prevent it: Avoid bringing home used furniture, mattresses or bedding. If you travel, inspect your hotel carefully for bed bugs (even upscale hotels have suffered from this problem), and avoid placing your luggage on the floor. If you find bed bugs in your home, contact an exterminator.
[10 Hidden Hazards in Your Home]
Sewer Line Problems
The portion of the sewer line that extends out from a home and onto city property is often the homeowners' responsibility when it comes to repairs. Sewer line problems are most common in older neighborhoods, where the line may have sagged or has been damaged by tree roots. If you have slow running or gurgling drains, frequent backups in your plumbing system or sewage smells outside your home, these may be indications of a problem. Again, your home insurance policy may cover this cost, expect this doozy to cost anywhere from $5,000 to $15,000 for a 100-foot sewer pipe.
How to prevent it: If you experience signs of sewer problems in your home, have a professional inspect your lines. Clogs and tree roots can often be removed at a lower cost, without complete replacement of the pipe.
The Bottom Line
With careful inspection and proper maintenance, you can avoid many of the worst perils that can befall your home -- or at least fix them before they become so expensive. Homeowners should also create an emergency fund to pay for unexpected home repairs.


--
Scott's Contracting
scottscontracting@gmail.com
http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.com

HOME STAR Provides Two Types of Consumer Incentives

About HOME STAR

Consumer Incentives:

HOME STAR provides two types of consumer incentives:

  1. The SILVER STAR prescriptive path provides a near-term incentive for specific energy saving investments that is simple to administer and easily introduced into the existing marketplace. Homeowners receive between $1,000 and $1,500 for each measure installed in the home, or $250 per appliance, with a benefit not exceeding $3,000 or at least 50% of total project costs (whichever is less). Covered measures include air sealing; attic, wall, and crawl space insulation; duct sealing or replacement; and replacement of existing windows and doors, furnaces, air conditioners, heat pumps, water heaters and appliances with high-efficiency models. The legislation will utilize existing standards for qualifying products at a level sufficient to significantly increase consumer demand for highly energy efficient building materials and mechanical systems.  SILVER STAR improvements may be implemented by any appropriately licensed and insured contractor, but all participating contractors will receive information about opportunities for accreditation and training programs.

  2. The GOLD STAR performance path offers an incentive to households that choose to conduct a comprehensive energy audit and then implement a variety of measures that are designed together to provide greater total returns in energy savings. This performance path represents the future of home efficiency: state-of-the-art building science is used to identify problems, present solutions and deliver verifiable energy savings, generating confidence among homeowners and investors alike. This technology-neutral approach is based on performance, not specific products, so market forces will direct funds to solutions that achieve the best results. A certified professional with accreditation from the Building Performance Institute (BPI), the Residential Energy Services Network (RESNET) or an approved equivalent conducts an energy audit before work begins, and a test-out when the performance retrofit is complete. Consumers receive $3,000 for modeled savings of 20%, plus an additional $1,000 incentive for each additional 5% of modeled energy savings, with incentives not to exceed 50% of project costs. Contractors implementing the GOLD STAR performance path must be BPI accredited.

Key Provisions:

Administrative Process: The HOME STAR program must meet several overarching goals. To be successful, HOME STAR must rapidly put construction workers back to work as well as create good, living-wage jobs for American workers; generate a minimum of new government bureaucracy; provide clear lines of authority; and offer a transparent process for all participants.

HOME STAR is not dependent on whether authority rests with a particular federal agency, rather authority could reside within a number of federal agencies without compromising the program goals. The federal government must, however, provide uniform guidance to establish consistent baseline resources and procedures for all states. States will take the lead in overseeing quality assurance programs and coordinating with existing programs to avoid duplication.  The ultimate implementation of this program will be driven by market transactions and as such the program will set aside administrative funds to drive consumer awareness.

HOME STAR will provide a rebate to consumers, which can be assigned to another party including the manufacturer, distributor, retailer, or contractor who completes the work. This rebate can be credited to consumers at multiple points in the transaction process including at the point of sale or point of completion of the job. Rebate checks can be issued either by the federal government, through existing state energy programs, or some combination of these entities based on infrastructure capability. In any case, administrative procedures must be designed for speed and efficiency, to roll out the program rapidly and effectively and to provide timely payments.

Quality Assurance: The program establishes a robust system of post-project-completion quality assurance to ensure quality installations adhering to technical standards and to provide accountability, protecting against waste, fraud and abuse. This system establishes industry performance standards, ensures that a portion of all jobs are inspected by credentialed professionals, and offers an additional incentive to contractors that invest in a trained and certified workforce.

Contractors can enroll in the program by registering and presenting proof of licensing and insurance to a quality assurance provider throughBPI, RESNET,or a provider designated by the state quality assurance plans. Homeowners may be contacted by a quality assurance provider for a field inspection after job completion to make sure that work was done according to standards and as contracted.  Each homeowner will have the right both to request or to choose not to receive, a home field inspection. The program will guarantee minimum inspection rates sufficient to assure quality work and provide accountability for contractors.

Quality assurance programs managed at the state level will maintain lists of qualified inspectors, facilitate access to training and certification programs (including outreach to low-income workers and minority contractors), coordinate with existing state and local efficiency programs, and develop systems for monitoring and enforcement. To provide for the long-term sustainability of this new and growing market, states will work with the Department of Energy to bring their quality assurance oversight up to a common national standard.

For GOLD STAR projects, contractors must submit a job completion checklist and work scope for each project, along with testing data, before the incentive is disbursed. SILVER STAR contractors are only required to submit a job completion checklist. For both the GOLD STAR and SILVER STAR programs, field quality assurance is conducted within 30 days on a sample of jobs to verify quality installation.

Quality Assurance requirements in HOME STAR will involve a simple paperwork review in approving individual rebates, in addition HOME STAR will provide a minimum baseline protocol for field inspection that is sufficiently rigorous to ensure high quality installation and appropriate consumer protection.  In all cases reduced inspection rates will be offered for contractors employing a trained and certified workforce.

Program Costs: To achieve rapid near-term job creation, $6 billion should be allocated to HOME STAR during the first year, $1.8 billion of which should be set aside for GOLD STAR incentives. While HOME STAR is envisioned as a time limited program, the GOLD STAR path should be continued beyond the first year as a bridge to permanent residential energy efficiency programs established by existing federal energy and climate legislation outlined below.

Legislative and Administrative Precedents: HOME STAR is endorsed by the President's Economic Recovery Advisory Board (PERAB). This proposal is based on the Retrofit for Energy and Environmental Performance (REEP) legislation that is included in the American Clean Energy and Security (ACES) Act passed by the House of Representatives, and in the Building Efficiency title of American Clean Energy Leadership Act (ACELA) reported out by the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee. Additional measures are drawn from leading state and local programs. This program also builds on investments made in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA), and on executive actions taken as a result of the Vice President's Recovery through Retrofit program.

The HOME STAR initiative will be significantly enhanced by proposed financing tools to reduce the upfront cost burden faced by homeowners for residential retrofit projects.

The establishment of additional incentives to cover commercial and industrial property would also be very valuable components of any legislation designed to create jobs through improved energy efficiency.

--
Scott's Contracting
scottscontracting@gmail.com
http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.blogspot.com
http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.com
scotty@stlouisrenewableenergy.com

9.17.2010

Poverty Rises as Wall Street Billionaires Whine

Les Leopold

Les Leopold

Posted: September 17, 2010 09:01 AM
The ranks of the working-age poor in the United States climbed to the highest level since the 1960s as the recession threw millions of people out of work last year, leaving one in seven Americans in poverty. The overall poverty rate climbed to 14.3 per cent, or 43.6 million people, the Census Bureau said yesterday in its annual report on the economic well-being of US households. Gulfnews.com
While 43.6 million Americans live in poverty, the richest men of finance sure are getting pissy. First Steve Schwartzman, head of the Blackrock private equity company, compares the Obama administration's effort to close billionaires' tax loopholes to "the Nazi invasion of Poland." Then hedge fund mogul David Loeb announces that he's abandoning the Democrats because they're violating "this country's core founding principles" -- including "non-punitive taxation, Constitutionally-guaranteed protections against persecution of the minority, and an inexorable right of self-determination." Instead of showing their outrage about the spread of poverty in the richest nation on Earth, the super-rich want us to pity them?


Why are Wall Street's billionaires so whiny? Is it really possible to make $900,000 an hour (not a typo -- that's what the top ten hedge fund managers take in), and still feel aggrieved about the way government is treating you? After you've been bailed out by the federal government to the tune of $10 trillion (also not a typo) in loans, asset swaps, liquidity and other guarantees, can you really still feel like an oppressed minority?

You'd think the Wall Street moguls would be thankful. Not just thankful -- down on their knees kissing the ground taxpayers walk on and hollering hallelujah at the top of their lungs! These guys profited from puffing up the housing bubble, then got bailed out when the going got tough. (Please see The Looting of America for all the gory details.) Without taxpayer largess, these hedge fund honchos would be flat broke. Instead, they're back to hauling in obscene profits.

These billionaires don't even have to worry about serious financial reforms. The paltry legislation that squeaked through Congress did nothing to end too big and too interconnected to fail. In fact, the biggest firms got even bigger as they gobbled up troubled banks, with the generous support of the federal government. No bank or hedge fund was broken up. Nobody was forced to pay a financial transaction tax. None of the big boys had a cap placed on their astronomical wealth. No one's paying reparations for wrecking the US economy. The big bankers are still free to create and trade the very derivatives that catapulted us into this global crisis. You'd think the billionaires would be praying on the altar of government and erecting statues on Capital Hill in honor of St. Bailout.


Instead, standing before us are these troubled souls, haunted by visions of persecution. Why?

The world changed. Before the bubble burst, these people walked on water. Their billions proved that they were the best and the brightest -- not just captains of the financial universe, but global elites who had earned a place in history. They donated serious money to worthy causes -- and political campaigns. No one wanted to mess with them.

But then came the crash. And the things changed for the big guys -- not so much financially as spiritually. Plebeians, including me, are asking pointed questions and sometimes even being heard, both on the Internet and in the mainstream media. For the first time in a generation, the public wants to know more about these emperors and their new clothes. For instance:

• What do these guys actually do that earns them such wealth?

• Is what they do productive and useful for society? Is there any connection between what they earn and what they produce for society?

• Did they help cause the crash?

• Did these billionaires benefit from the bailouts? If so, how much?

• Are they exacerbating the current unemployment and poverty crisis with their shenanigans?

• Why shouldn't we eliminate their tax loopholes (like carried interest)?

• Should their sky-high incomes be taxed at the same levels as during the Eisenhower years?

• Can we create the millions of jobs we need if the billionaires continue to skim off so much of our nation's wealth??

• Should we curb their wealth and political influence?

How dare we ask such questions! How dare we consider targeting them for special taxes? How dare we even think about redistributing THEIR incomes... even if at the moment much of their money comes directly from our bailouts and tax breaks?

It's true that the billionaires live in a hermetically sealed world. But that doesn't mean they don't notice the riffraff nipping at their heels. And they don't like it much. So they've gotten busy doing what billionaires do best: using their money to shield themselves. They're digging into their bottomless war chests, tapping their vast connections and using their considerable influence to shift the debate away from them and towards the rest of us.
We borrowed too much, not them. We get too much health care, not them. We retire too soon, not them. We need to tighten our belts while they pull in another $900,000 an hour. And if we want to cure poverty, we need to get the government to leave Wall Street alone. Sadly, their counter-offensive is starting to take hold.

How can this happen? Many Americans want to relate to billionaires. They believe that all of us are entitled to make as much as we can, pretty much by any means necessary. After all, maybe someday you or I will strike it rich. And when we do, we sure don't want government regulators or the taxman coming around!

Billionaires are symbols of American individual prowess and virility. And if we try to hold them back or slow them down, we're on the road to tyranny. Okay, the game is rigged in their favor. Okay, they got bailed out while the rest of us didn't -- especially the 29 million people who are jobless or forced into part-time work. But what matters most is that in America, nothing can interfere with individual money-making. That only a few of us actually make it into the big-time isn't a bad thing: It's what makes being rich so special. So beware: If we enact even the mildest of measures to rein in Wall Street billionaires, we're on the path to becoming North Korea.

Unfortunately, if we don't adjust our attitudes, we can expect continued high levels of unemployment and more people pushed below the poverty line. It's not clear that our economy will ever recover as long as the Wall Street billionaires keep siphoning off so much of our wealth. How can we create jobs for the many while the few are walking off with $900,000 an hour with almost no new jobs to show for it? In the old days, even robber barons built industries that employed people -- steel, oil, railroads. Now the robber barons build palaces out of fantasy finance. We can keep coddling our financial billionaires and let our economy spiral down, or we can make them pay their fair share so we can create real jobs. These guys crashed the economy, they killed billions of jobs, and now they're cashing in on our bailout. They owe us. They owe the unemployed. They owe the poor.

Dwight D. Eisenhower was no radical, but he accepted the reality: If America was going to prosper -- and pay for its costly Cold War -- the super-rich would have to pony up. It was common knowledge that when the rich grew too wealthy, they used their excess incomes to speculate. In the 1950s, memories of the Great Depression loomed large, and people knew that a skewed distribution of income only fueled speculative booms and disastrous busts. On Ike's watch, the effective marginal tax rate for those earning over $3 million (in today's dollars) was over 70 percent. The super-rich paid. As a nation we respected that other important American value: advancing the common good.

For the last thirty years we've been told that making as much as you can is just another way of advancing the common good. But the Great Recession erased that equation: The Wall Streeters who made as much as they could undermined the common good. It's time to balance the scales. This isn't just redistribution of income in pursuit of some egalitarian utopia. It's a way to use public policy to reattach billionaires to the common good.

It's time to take Eisenhower's cue and redeploy the excessive wealth Wall Street's high rollers have accumulated. If we leave it in their hands, they'll keep using it to construct speculative financial casinos. Instead, we could use that money to build a stronger, more prosperous nation. We could provide our people with free higher education at all our public colleges and universities -- just like we did for WWII vets under the GI Bill of Rights (a program that returned seven dollars in GDP for every dollar invested). We could fund a green energy Manhattan Project to wean us from fossil fuels. An added bonus: If we siphon some of the money off Wall Street, some of our brightest college graduates might even be attracted not to high finance but to jobs in science, education and healthcare, where we need them.

Of course, this pursuit of the common good won't be easy for the billionaires (and those who indentify with them.). But there's just no alternative for this oppressed minority: They're going to have to learn to live on less than $900,000 an hour.

Les Leopold is the author of The Looting of America: How Wall Street's Game of Fantasy Finance destroyed our Jobs, Pensions and Prosperity, and What We Can Do About It Chelsea Green Publishing, June 2009.
Search Amazon.com for Les Leopold













--
Scott's Contracting
scottscontracting@gmail.com
http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.blogspot.com
http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.com
scotty@stlouisrenewableenergy.com

St Louis Construction News-Wind Farm-Eads Bridge

Eads Bridge fix-up, Missouri wind farm on list of stimulus projects

Share |
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

buy this photo LAURIE SKRIVAN OCTOBER 7 2009 - A metro link train travels underneath the Eads Bridge Wednesday morning. Metro is preparing to plow $25 million in federal stimulus funds into rehabilitating the structural supports of the historic Eads Bridge. The work will include rehab of the steel work, repainting the framework, and replacing the track and overhead lines that power the MetroLink trains that use the bridge. Laurie Skrivan lskrivan@post-dispatch.com

Related Stories

WASHINGTON - The Obama administration has more than a few doubters when it comes to the beneficial impacts of the $800 billion-plus stimulus program.

Trying to counter perceptions, Vice President Joe Biden put out a http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/100-Recovery-Act-Projects-Changing-America-Report.pdf"> report today with the title "100 Recovery Act Projects That Are Changing America."

They include traditional bricks-and-mortar spending along with new-style initiatives such as expenditures for broadband expansion, solar energy and electric car battery plants.

Biden sounded like he was warming up for the 2012 election in a statement contending that with the kind of projects being funded, "we're starting to turn the page on a decade of failed economic policies and rebuild our economy on a new foundation ..."

A $25 million grant for work on the Eads Bridge connecting Missouri and Illinois at St. Louis is among the old-style infrastructure projects on the list of 100.

The report says that engineering will be completed in coming months and that the project will create some 875 construction jobs over two years when it gets going next spring.

The work will provide safety upgrades to both the superstructure and the piers that support the 136-year-old bridge and "would not be possible" without the stimulus money, the report asserts.

Among the "green" projects in the report is a $107 million grant-in-lieu-of tax credit for the Lost Creek Wind Farm in northwest Missouri.

That project is developed by Wind Capital Group of St. Louis, whose president and CEO is Tom Carnahan. He's the brother of Rep. Russ Carnahan, D-St. Louis, and Missouri Secretary of State Robin Carnahan.

The report says that the award occurred in July and that the project created 300 jobs during construction. A Lost Creek spokesman said that the wind farm, which already is in operation, created 2,500 throughout the supply chain.

Also on the list is a $32 million grant to Smith Electric in Kansas City. The report says that the award will enable the company to build some 500 all-electric trucks and support more than 220 direct and indirect jobs. $25 million grant for work on the Eads Bridge connecting Missouri and Illinois at St. Louis is among the old-style infrastructure projects on the list of 100.



--
Scott's Contracting
scottscontracting@gmail.com
http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.blogspot.com
http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.com
scotty@stlouisrenewableenergy.com

Re: No Back Room Deals for Big Polluters



On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Environmental Defense Action Fund <takeaction@edf.org> wrote:

Having trouble using links or viewing images? View the web version.

According to a news report this week, Congressional climate action opponents are hosting back room meetings with polluter lobbyists promising to block action on any new climate legislation in exchange for campaign donations.

Help us tell your members of Congress, "No Back Room Deals for Big Polluters."

Environmental Defense Action Fund

Dear Scotts Contracting,

smokestack red

Climate action opponents are promising big polluters to block climate action next year in exchange for campaign contributions.

Tell your members of Congress "No Back Room Deals for Polluters."

According to a report in Politico, House Energy and Commerce Committee ranking member Joe Barton (R-TX), Committee member Fred Upton (R-MI), and three other Republican Committee members met this week with 40-50 corporate lobbyists at the National Republican Club.

An industry source who attended the meeting said the message was clear:

"You should be giving us money because we're going to be in charge. We'll ensure there is no climate bill. But at the same time, they think they'll build nuclear plants and more clean coal."

Meanwhile, in the Senate, West Virginia Democrat Jay Rockefeller claimed to have 53 Senators supporting his bill to block the Environmental Protection Agency from cutting climate pollution from America's largest carbon emitters. He needs only 7 more votes to reach the filibuster-proof 60-vote majority.

These are very high stakes in our fight to hold polluters accountable, promote cleaner air, and fight for climate action. We need your continued support and activism now more than ever before.

Please send an email to your members of Congress today and tell them "No Back Room Deals for Polluters."

Our members of Congress need to hear from their constituents on these issues -- they need to know that the polluters aren't the only ones paying attention. Let them know that you oppose any and all efforts to weaken America's clean air laws and that you support clean energy and climate action.

What's at Stake

The EPA is scheduled to begin implementing new climate pollution limits on January 1. This is the result of a 2007 Supreme Court ruling declaring that the EPA not only has the authority to regulate carbon emissions under the Clean Air Act, it has the obligation to do so.

Last year, the EPA issued an endangerment finding detailing the threat of global warming to human health. EPA later issued its plans to initiate pollution limits starting with America's biggest emitters.

When the Senate decided it was not going to vote on a comprehensive climate and energy bill this year, the full attention of the big polluters and their lobbyists shifted to EPA climate action. Senators from both sides of the aisle have offered legislative proposals to limit EPA authority, including an insidious plan to attach an amendment to must-pass appropriations bills.

This is part of a broader strategy by the big polluters to strike down a wide range of pollution limits. Corporate lobbyists are also pushing to weaken the "boiler rule," which limits emissions of toxic mercury, dioxins, and other hazardous pollutants.

The polluting industries have already spent $514 million over the last 18 months to block climate legislation. And the U.S. Chamber of Commerce has pledged to spend $100 million over the next few years to continue to promote big polluter and other corporate interests. We must remain vigilant in the fight.

Please email your members of Congress today to make sure they know you support EPA climate action and you support America's clean air laws.

With your support, we can stand up to the big polluters and their friends in Congress and keep up the pressure to promote climate legislation.

Thank you for your activism and support,
Environmental Defense Action Fund

Bookmark and Share

Environmental Defense Action Fund
1875 Connecticut Ave. NW, Suite 600
Washington, DC 20009
1-800-591-1919

4 Stars from Charity Navigator





--
Scott's Contracting
scottscontracting@gmail.com
http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.blogspot.com
http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.com
scotty@stlouisrenewableenergy.com

Connect with Scotts Contracting

FB FB Twitter LinkedIn Blog Blog Blog Blog Pinterest

Featured Post

How Two Friends Turned Abandoned CASTLE into a 4☆HOTEL | by @chateaudut...

Join us on an extraordinary journey as two lifelong friends, Francis and Benoit, turn a crumbling, centuries-old castle into a stunning 4-st...