-- Scotts Contracting - StLouis Renewable Energy

Search This Blog

10.05.2010

Solar on the White House Finally Agreed Upon



On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Elizabeth Bast, Oil Change International <info@priceofoil.org> wrote:
Oil Change International



Dear Scotts Contracting,

I wanted to share some great news and congratulate our friends at 350.org:

A few weeks ago, 350.org activists delivered a request to the White House to put up solar panels (along with a gift of one of the White House solar panels from the Carter Administration!).

This morning, the Obama Administration announced it would put up solar panels and a solar hot water heater on the White House by spring 2011!

Help keep the momentum going! Join with 350.org and all of us this weekend for the Global Work Party on 10/10/10. It will be an historic global day of action to stop climate change and get to work on building the clean energy economy of the future.

This Sunday, we will join 350.org in sending politicians around the world a clear message: "We're getting to work - what about you?"  So far, over 6200 events in 185 countries are planned for 10/10/10 - truly a remarkable movement.

So, we urge you to look up 350.org to see what's going on in your area, make a difference and join in the fun.

Sincerely,

Elizabeth

--
Elizabeth Bast
Managing Director
Oil Change International


P.S. - Some of you know that our good friends at Sungevity helped start the campaign to put solar on the White House.  Congratulations to all of them as well!  We'll have more news of an exciting partnership between Oil Change International and Sungevity soon.

 

 



--
Scott's Contracting
scottscontracting@gmail.com
http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.blogspot.com
http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.com
scotty@stlouisrenewableenergy.com

Arctic Sea Ice Reaches Third Lowest Point

Arctic Sea Ice Reaches Third Lowest Point

By LiveScience Staff

posted: 04 October 2010 05:23 pm ET

Sea-ice coverage in the Arctic experienced a highly unusual late-season decline, falling to its third lowest amount on record, the National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC) announced today (Oct. 4).

It added that the abnormal event emphasizes the Arctic's growing vulnerability to summer melt.

Arctic sea ice goes through a normal cycle of summer melting and refreezing during the winter months, but the overall ice coverage has become younger and thinner during its dramatic decline over the past 30 years. Researchers who had assumed the end of the melt season had arrived when the ice coverage began growing after Sept. 10 were surprised to see it shrinking once again sometime after that and up until Sept. 19.

"The late-season turnaround indicates that the ice cover is thin and loosely packed – which makes the ice more vulnerable both to winds and to melting," said Walt Meier, NSIDC research scientist at the University of Colorado in Boulder.

Arctic sea ice reached its lowest point of 1.78 million square miles (4.60 million square kilometers) on Sept. 19, which gives 2010 the record for the third lowest ice coverage ever in both daily and monthly average tallies. That puts the ice coverage below last year's record, with the lowest- and second-lowest coverage taking place in 2007 and 2008.

The oldest and thickest ice (five years or older) has vanished almost entirely in the Arctic. Less than 23,000 square miles (60,000 square kilometers) of the old ice remained in September, as opposed to an average of 722,000 square miles (2 million square kilometers) that lingered by summer's end in the 1980s.

There's perhaps some hope for the ice coverage, because of a rebound in younger ice coverage (as new ice forms) over the past two years – even as total ice coverage has continued to fall. Whether or not the younger ice can survive the next several summers and slow the great decline remains a mystery, researchers say.

But either way, all signs point to the Arctic ice coverage breaking up during the next few decades. The fabled Northwest Passage has already opened for a few bold ship captains.

"All indications are that sea ice will continue to decline over the next several decades," said Mark Serreze, director of the NSIDC. "We are still looking at a seasonally ice-free Arctic in 20 to 30 years."

Ultrathin Carbon Discovery-Nobel Prize

Nobel physics prize for ultrathin carbon discovery

AP
This undated image made available by the University of Manchester, England Tuesday Oct. 5, 2010 shows Russian-born scientist Konstantin Novoselov in M AP – This undated image made available by the University of Manchester, England Tuesday 
 
 
 

STOCKHOLM – Two Russian-born scientists shared the Nobel Prize in physics on Tuesday for "groundbreaking experiments" with the thinnest, strongest material known to mankind — a carbon vital for the creation of faster computers and transparent touch screens.

University of Manchester professors Andre Geim and Konstantin Novoselov used Scotch tape to isolate graphene, a form of carbon only one atom thick but more than 100 times stronger than steel, and showed it has exceptional properties, the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences said.

Experiments with graphene could lead to the development of new superstrong materials with which to make satellites, airplanes and cars, as well as innovative electronics, the academy said in announcing the 10 million kronor ($1.5 million) award.

Geim compared the material to plastic in its ability to revolutionize the world.

"It has all the potential to change your life in the same way that plastics did," he told The Associated Press on Tuesday. "It is really exciting."

The Nobel academy said computers will become more efficient as "graphene transistors are predicted to be substantially faster than today's silicon transistors."

"Since it is practically transparent and a good conductor, graphene is suitable for producing transparent touch screens, light panels and maybe even solar cells," the academy said in its citation.

Geim, 51, is a Dutch national while Novoselov, 36, holds both British and Russian citizenship. Both are natives of Russia and started their careers in physics there. They first worked together in the Netherlands before moving to Britain, and they reported isolating graphene in 2004.

Novoselov is the youngest winner since 1973 of a prize that normally goes to scientists with decades of experience. The youngest Nobel laureate to date is Lawrence Bragg, who was 25 when he shared the physics award with his father William Bragg in 1915.

"It's a shock," Novoselov told the AP. "I started my day chatting over Skype over new developments — it was quite unexpected."

Geim said he didn't expect to win the prize this year either and had forgotten that it was Nobel time when the prize committee called him from Stockholm.

The two scientists used simple Scotch tape as a crucial tool in their experiments, peeling off thin flakes of graphene from a piece of graphite, the stuff of pencil leads.

"It's a humble technique. But the hard work came later," Geim told the AP.

Paolo Radaelli, a physics professor at the University of Oxford, marveled at the simple methods used by Geim and Novoselov.

"In this age of complexity, with machines like the super collider, they managed to get the Nobel using Scotch tape," Radaelli said.

Geim last year won the prestigious Korber European Science Award for the discovery, the University of Manchester said.

"This was a well-deserved award," said Phillip F. Schewe, spokesman for the American Institute of Physics in College Park, Maryland.

"Graphene is the thinnest material in the world, it's one of the strongest, maybe the strongest material in the world. It's an excellent conductor. Electrons move through it very quickly, which is something you want to make circuits out of," Schewe said.

He said graphene may be a good material for making integrated circuits, small chips with millions of transistors that are the backbone of all modern telecommunications. Its properties could also lead to potential uses in construction material, Schewe said, but added it would take a while "before this sort of technology moves into mainstream application."

The 2010 Nobel Prize announcements started Monday with the medicine award going to British researcher Robert Edwards, 85, for work that led to the first test tube baby. That achievement helped bring 4 million infants into the world so far and has raised challenging new questions about human reproduction.

The chemistry prize will be announced Wednesday, followed by literature on Thursday, the peace prize on Friday and economics on Monday Oct. 11.

The prestigious awards were created by Swedish industrialist Alfred Nobel and first given out in 1901. The prizes are always handed out on Dec. 10, the anniversary of Nobel's death in 1896.

___

Associated Press Writers Malin Rising in Stockholm, Danica Kirka in London and AP Science Writer Malcolm Ritter in New York contributed to this report.

--
Scott's Contracting
scottscontracting@gmail.com
http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.blogspot.com
http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.com
scotty@stlouisrenewableenergy.com

10.04.2010

MegaVote: MO 3rd, 10/4/2010



On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 6:28 PM, <megavote@mailmanager.net> wrote:

presented by:
Solar Nation

October 4, 2010

In this MegaVote for Missouri's 3rd Congressional District:

Recent Congressional Votes

  • Senate: Continuing Appropriations Act, 2011
  • House: NASA Authorization Act of 2010
  • House: Continuing Appropriations Act, 2011

    Editor's Note: The House is in recess until Monday, November 15, 2010. The Senate will hold a series of pro forma sessions over the next month.

    Recent Senate Votes
    Continuing Appropriations Act, 2011 - Vote Passed (69-30, 1 Not Voting)

    The Senate passed this measure funding government operations through December 3, 2010. The 2011 fiscal year began on October 1, 2010 with none of the annual spending bills completed. The House passed the measure a short time later and President Obama signed it into law on September 30.

    Sen. Christopher Bond voted YES......send e-mail or see bio
    Sen. Claire McCaskill voted YES......send e-mail or see bio


    Recent House Votes
    NASA Authorization Act of 2010 - Vote Passed (304-118, 10 Not Voting)

    The House gave final approval to this bill authorizing $58.4 billion in NASA spending over the next three fiscal years. The president is expected to sign the bill which largely follows the administration's plan for NASA.

    Rep. Russ Carnahan voted YES......send e-mail or see bio


    Continuing Appropriations Act, 2011 - Vote Passed (228-194, 10 Not Voting)

    The House gave final approval to this measure funding government operations through December 3, 2010. The 2011 fiscal year began on October 1, 2010 with none of the annual spending bills completed. The president signed it into law on September 30.

    Rep. Russ Carnahan voted YES......send e-mail or see bio






    --
    Scott's Contracting
    scottscontracting@gmail.com
    http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.blogspot.com
    http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.com
    scotty@stlouisrenewableenergy.com

    Taking Advantage of Expiring Fed Tax Incentives

    This is the year. If you've been sitting on home fixes, waiting for the right time, it's 2010. Lucrative federal tax incentives are set to expire at the end of 2010, meaning these projects will never be more affordable. The government will cover 30% of the costs, in most cases, and investments in energy efficiency generally pay for themselves over time, since you'll be paying for less wasted energy year after year. (Except where noted, taxpayers can qualify for no more than $1,500, regardless of the total cost of multiple qualifying projects were performed in 2009 and 2010.)


    Measure twice, cut once. A professional home energy audit can help you target the most critical fixes first, or do your own energy audit to identify the most cost-effective fixes. Before you do the work, check this database of state incentives, so you're sure to take advantage of the full range of credits, which in some states require energy audits or installation by accredited professionals.

    One of the most cost-effective home improvements, good insulation can save up to 30% on heating and cooling costs, since you won't be paying for heating or cooling air that slips out through poorly insulated walls, floors and ceilings. If you choose approved insulation (meeting International Energy Conservation Code standards), you can have 30% of the cost, up to $1,500, taken off your 2010 income tax bill. If you have the wherewithal, install the insulation yourself, because the cost of labor does not qualify for the tax credit.

    If your home has old windows and doors, you're paying a premium for them as hot air in the winter, and cool air in the summer, escapes to the outdoors. But replacing doors and, especially, windows, is an expensive fix that won't pay itself off in energy savings for years. If you do the work in 2010, though, you can get 30% of the cost reimbursed at tax time, up to $1,500. You just have to choose energy efficient equipment that meets standards. Be aware that the federal government will not reimburse for any of the cost of labor.

    Whether it's a refrigerator, a furnace or an A/C unit, chances are good that 2010 will be the best year to replace an old clunker with a new efficient model. Efficient furnaces, central air conditioners, water heaters and other HVAC standbys qualify for a tax credit equal to 30% of the cost, up to $1,500.
    A home "cash for clunkers" program is also gearing up at the state level, so look for local incentives to defray the cost of buying certain Energy Star appliances like clothes washers, dishwashers, freezers, refrigerators and small A/C units). Furnaces and water heaters are the biggest energy users overall, while refrigerators are typically the biggest electricity hogs.

    Both Energy Star-rated metal roofs with "pigmented coatings" and asphalt roofs with "cooling granules" will cut down on cooling costs in the summer by reflecting more of the sun's heat. It's also a dark horse solution to global warming, since cities absorb so much heat through dark roofing materials. If your roof is ready for a replacement, then go with one of these materials, and the government will reimburse 30% of your material costs, up to $1,500. Sorry, labor not included.

    Unlike the energy efficiency projects, home solar tax credits extend beyond 2010, to 2016. So plan now to take advantage of generous tax credits that will pay 30% of the cost of home solar projects, including solar water heaters. Unlike other credits, these credits are not capped at $1,500. Additionally, communities in at least 15 states are beginning to offer so-called PACE loans that are paid off incrementally at tax time by whomever owns the house. The annual cost -- typically less than the energy savings provided by the investment -- is shared by successive owners of the home.

    A smart meter makes realtime energy usage data available so you can easily cut out waste. Before long, the meters will automatically cut waste by flipping on appliances to run only when the cost of electricity is low. Ask your local utility if it's offering smart meters, and look for government incentives soon. The Obama Administration has set a goal of increasing the use of smart meters five-fold to 40 million American homes by 2015.

    Read more: http://www.thedailygreen.com/green-homes/latest/resolutions-new-years-2010?click=getstarted#ixzz11QrhtcIR
    :

    --
    Scott's Contracting
    scottscontracting@gmail.com
    http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.blogspot.com
    http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.com
    scotty@stlouisrenewableenergy.com

    What Will It Take to Achieve a US Renewable Portfolio Standard?

    What Will It Take to Achieve a US Renewable Portfolio Standard?

    I was keeping a tally sheet at last week's Renewable Energy Finance Forum, so I could let readers know the issue that was brought up most often and granted the most overall prominence. The clear winner: China is eating our lunch in the migration to renewables. Inexplicably and tragically, the US is content to drop further and further behind in the development of energy technology with each passing week. While China is hiring, researching, developing, importing, exporting — and dominating the world of 21st Century energy, we seem to be content to argue and point fingers at each other.
    As Winston Churchhill observed, "America will always do the right thing — after it has exhausted all other options."   But can anyone see this moving anytime soon — for any reason — least of all because it's "the right thing?"   None of the promises of renewable energy: jobs, national security, addressing concerns about peak oil and the climate issue — seem to motivate action on our part.

    Perhaps the most visible proof of our nation's abdication of technology leadership is the absence of a federal renewable energy portfolio standard (RPS). What are we to make of the fact that we seem to be a million miles from such a piece of legislation? Clearly, it's the result of leaders' pandering for votes, while scrupulously avoiding areas of controversy that might be used against them.

    And now, with the recent Supreme Court decision enabling corporations to provide unlimited funding to anonymous entities that can, in turn, spend millions of campaign advertising dollars to defeat perceived enemies, our leaders need to be even more careful than they were when their enemies had to identify themselves and use their own money to slander opponents.  This, of course, is another true disaster for those of us who care about free and fair elections and continue (foolishly?) to hold out hope for the effectiveness of the democratic process.

    But enough about that. What about the federal RPS? Is there any hope that we can re-establish ourselves as the leader in energy technology? Here's another tidbit from the conference: Adding nuclear power into the mix of renewables might provide the political muscle to pass a federal RPS.  After all, it IS carbon-free.  Proponents claim, "Nuclear energy presents a safe, clean, and inexpensive alternative to other methods of producing electricity. Nuclear waste can either be reprocessed or disposed of safely."

    But is any of this true? No. Do most renewable energy supporters believe that nuclear should be included in the list of clean energy technologies? Of course not.  

    But who cares?  In the 10-or-so years it takes to plan and permit the next nuclear reactor, the cost/benefit of photovoltaics, wind, concentrating solar power, geothermal, and biomass will have improved to such a point that nuclear will be completely irrelevant.
    Go on; invite them to the party. Give them all the political support they've worked so long and hard to purchase.  In the end, it won't matter. Despite the rhetoric, you'll never see another nuke deployed in the US.

    Scotty: I hope the Authors correct in his thinking that: "...you'll never see another nuke deployed in the US"  I worry about the:
    1. Waste of Nuclear Plants and the supposed: reprocessing or disposed of safely.
    2. Nuclear Silos being Targets for Terrorism
    3. The Overall Costs of a Nuclear system. 


    --
    Scott's Contracting
    scottscontracting@gmail.com

    # RENEWABLE SOURCES NOW PROVIDE 11.14% OF U.S. ENERGY PRODUCTION AND 10.91% OF NET GRID-CONNECTED

    U.S. Energy Information Administration most recent review.

    • RENEWABLE  SOURCES  NOW PROVIDE 11.14% OF  U.S.  ENERGY  PRODUCTION AND  10.91%  OF  NET  GRID-CONNECTED  ELECTRICAL GENERATION 
    • RENEWABLES NOW NECK-IN-NECK WITH NUCLEAR POWER

    Washington DC -- According to the most recent issue of the "Monthly Energy Review" by the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), renewable energy sources (i.e., biofuels, biomass, geothermal, hydroelectric, solar, wind) provided 11.14% of domestic U.S. energy production during the first six months of 2010 – the latest time-frame for which data has been published.  

     

    This continues the steady growth trend for renewable energy.  Renewables accounted for 10.71% of domestic energy production during the first six months of 2009 and 10.35% during the first six months of 2008.   

     

    Renewable energy sources provided 4.106 quadrillion Btus between January 1, 2010 and June 30, 2010 - an increase of 4.91% over the first half of 2009 and an increase of 8.37% over the first half of 2008.  The largest single renewable energy source was biomass (including biofuels) which accounted for 50.66% of renewable energy production, followed by hydropower at 32.56%. Wind, geothermal, and solar sources provided 10.91%, 4.53%, and 1.32% of the total renewable energy output respectively.     

     

    Moreover, renewable energy's contribution to the nation's domestic energy production is now almost equal to that provided by nuclear power. Nuclear power accounted for 11.19% of domestic energy production during the first half of 2010 - compared to 11.14% from renewables. But while renewable sources continue to expand, nuclear output in 2010 dropped - declining by 1.3% from its comparable 2009 level.

     

    "When Congress resumes its debate on pending energy and climate legislation in the post-election lame-duck session, it would do well to take note of the clear trends in the nation's changing energy mix," said Ken Bossong, Executive Director of the SUN DAY Campaign.  "Renewable energy has proven itself to be a solid investment - growing rapidly and nipping at the heels of the stagnant nuclear power industry."

     

    And according to EIA's latest "Electric Power Monthly," renewable energy sources provided 10.91% of net U.S. electrical generation for the same time period. Non-hydro renewable energy sources (i.e., biomass, geothermal, solar, wind) provided nearly 4.07% of domestic U.S. electrical generation during the first half of 2010. Hydropower provided an additional 6.84% of net U.S. electrical generation for the same time period.

     

    Moreover, electrical generation from non-hydro renewable sources continues to grow rapidly. According to EIA data, electricity from biomass, geothermal, solar, and wind during the first six months of 2010 increased by 13.0% over the amount generated during the first half of 2009. Wind-generated electricity increased by 21.4%; electricity from solar thermal and photovoltaics rose by 16.4%; wood & other forms of biomass rose by 4.5%; and geothermal output increased by 0.8%.

     

    The U.S. Energy Information Administration released its most recent "Monthly Energy Review" on September 30, 2010.  It can be found at:  http://www.eia.gov/emeu/mer/contents.html .  The relevant charts from which the data above are extrapolated are Tables 1.2 and 10.1.  EIA released its most recent "Electric Power Monthly" on September 15, 2010; see:  http://www.eia.gov/cneaf/electricity/epm/epm_sum.html. The relevant charts are Tables ES1.A, ES1.B and 1.1.A.

    Source: Sun Day Campaign



    --
    Scott's Contracting
    scottscontracting@gmail.com
    http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.blogspot.com
    http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.com
    scotty@stlouisrenewableenergy.com

    Connect with Scotts Contracting

    FB FB Twitter LinkedIn Blog Blog Blog Blog Pinterest

    Featured Post

    How Two Friends Turned Abandoned CASTLE into a 4☆HOTEL | by @chateaudut...

    Join us on an extraordinary journey as two lifelong friends, Francis and Benoit, turn a crumbling, centuries-old castle into a stunning 4-st...