-- Scotts Contracting - StLouis Renewable Energy

Search This Blog

4.01.2011

Most Americans Improving Energy Efficiency at Home



While oil prices rise in response to unrest in oil producing nations and increased demand from growing nations, Americans continue to discuss and consider alternative energy options and lifestyle changes amidst a slow economic recovery. Six in ten (61%) Americans describe themselves as knowledgeable about energy issues, including sources of electrical power and energy efficiency. This is relatively unchanged since 2009 when 59% of Americans described themselves as knowledgeable about energy issues.

Fewer are knowledgeable about energy issues and sources of electrical power


NEW YORK, March 22, 2011 /PRNewswire/ --

These are some of the results of The Harris Poll of 3,171 adults surveyed online between February 14 and 21, 2011 by Harris Interactive.

Energy knowledge varies by region and age with Americans in the East (67%) and West (64%) and those over the age of 65 (65%) most knowledgeable. Three-quarters of men (75%) say they are knowledgeable about energy issues while less than half (47%) of women say the same.

Sources of Energy for Electric Power Production

When it comes to sources of energy, the public indicates that the benefits outweigh the risks for wind (75%) and solar power (77%). Natural gas (64%) and geothermal (52%) resonate as beneficial while there is less certainty about the benefits of nuclear (42%) and coal (38%).  These views compare to 2009 when at least two-thirds of Americans said that when used, the benefits of solar (82%), wind (78%) and natural gas (66%) outweighed any associated risks.

In 2009, two in five Americans (42%) said the risks of using coal outweighed the benefits while 36% believed the benefits outweighed the risks. Further, almost one-quarter of Americans (22%) said they were not at all sure. Today, that view has not changed very much as 38% say benefits outweigh risks, but 43% believe the risks outweigh the benefits; those unsure has dropped to 19%.

Nuclear power plant proposals, after a U.S. hiatus on new plant construction, have been surging. Less than half of Americans (42%) say the benefits outweigh the risks of nuclear energy while 21% are not at all sure and 37% say the risks outweigh the benefits. In 2009, the view was similar - 44% of Americans said the benefits outweighed the risks and 34% believed the risks outweighed the benefits. When asked about nuclear power plant waste, 69% of Americans agree that it is a national issue. Two in ten (22%) are not at all sure.

When asked if renewable energy and climate change are issues states should manage as opposed to the federal government, Americans are split – 36% agree these are issues for individual states to handle, 43% disagree and 21% are not at all sure.

Improving Energy Efficiency at Home

Eight in ten Americans (84%) say they turn off lights and appliances when not in use to conserve energy. Americans are also replacing incandescent bulbs with fluorescent bulbs (60%), using power strips (60%), using low-wattage bulbs (56%), purchasing Energy Star™ appliances (53%), and reducing hot water usage (51%). When it comes to more complex tasks such as weather stripping, sealing gaps and installation of products, the responses drop to between 29% and 38% for each behavior. Even fewer (11%) conduct home energy evaluations or audits and 5% say they engage in none of these activities.

Smart Grid

More than half of all Americans (56%) have not heard the term "smart grid," with more than six in ten women unfamiliar with it (66%, compared to 46% of men).

When asked whether or not "smart grid" will increase the use of solar, wind and other renewable sources, only 38% agree that it will while 55% are not at all sure.  Likewise, six in ten Americans (60%) are not at all sure if "smart grid" will increase the cost of electricity—24% agree that it will.

So What?

Over the past few years, there have been coal mine rescues; state legislation to prohibit mountain top mining of coal; and, increasing Environmental Protection Agency regulatory actions on coal plants. Coal provides approximately half (49%) of electrical power production in the United States, is the most heavily used source of energy and is being subjected to a high degree of regulatory scrutiny. It is estimated that 16% of the existing U.S. coal plant will be shut down over the next five years because of the cost of regulatory compliance. The question is – what will replace coal, especially in the eastern U.S.?

This survey fielded prior to the recent Japanese earthquake, tsunami and resulting nuclear power plant issues. U.S. nuclear power plants are similar in design and function to those in Japan so it is unclear what effect the Japanese incident will have on American perceptions of nuclear power. But, this poll makes clear that Americans believe nuclear waste is a national issue to resolve.

However, there remains limited knowledge of many alternative energy sources, as new debates over national security and foreign oil dependence, gas prices at the pump and the correlation between energy costs and economic recovery rage on. Significant room still exists to educate the public on the pros and cons of each source of energy including factors such as: current and future use of each source, reliability, cost, environmental impacts, safety, security and ways to become more energy efficient.  

TABLE 1

KNOWLEDGE ABOUT ENERGY ISSUES AND ELECTRICAL POWER

"Thinking of something else, how knowledgeable would you say you are about energy issues including sources of electrical power and energy efficiency?"


Base: All adults



Total 2009

Total

2011

Region

Gender


East

Midwest

South

West

Male

Female


%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%


Knowledgeable (NET)

59

61

67

57

57

64

75

47


    Very knowledgeable

9

12

20

9

8

13

21

4


    Somewhat knowledgeable

50

49

47

48

49

51

55

44


Not knowledgeable (NET)

41

39

33

43

43

36

25

53


    Not very knowledgeable

32

31

27

34

34

27

20

41


    Not at all knowledgeable

8

9

7

9

9

10

5

12


















Age


18-24

25-29

30-39

40-49

50-64

65+


%

%

%

%

%

%


Knowledgeable (NET)

55

54

63

61

61

65


    Very knowledgeable

10

9

23

9

10

9


    Somewhat knowledgeable

44

44

40

52

52

57


Not knowledgeable (NET)

45

46

37

39

39

35


    Not very knowledgeable

37

36

28

29

30

29


    Not at all knowledgeable

8

11

9

10

8

6


Note: Percentages may not add to 100% due to rounding.











TABLE 2

BENEFITS VERSUS RISKS FOR VARIOUS ENERGY SOURCES

"There are many sources of electric power used in the U.S.  To the best of your knowledge, would you say the benefits of each source outweigh the risks or do you believe the risks outweigh the benefits?"


Base: All adults



BENEFITS

OUTWEIGH

RISKS (NET)

Benefits

strongly

outweigh

risks

Benefits

somewhat

outweigh

risks

RISKS

OUTWEIGH

BENEFITS

(NET)

Risks

somewhat

outweigh

benefits

Risks

strongly

outweigh

benefits

Not at all sure


%

%

%

%

%

%

%


Solar

2011

77

64

13

8

3

6

14


2009

82

68

14

5

3

2

13


Wind

2011

75

61

14

10

3

7

15


2009

78

62

17

7

4

2

15


Natural gas

2011

64

31

34

17

11

6

18


2009

66

30

36

14

11

3

20


Geothermal

2011

52

33

18

10

5

5

38


2009

52

32

20

7

5

2

40


Nuclear

2011

42

20

22

37

18

19

21


2009

44

21

23

34

17

17

22


Coal

2011

38

15

23

43

24

18

19


2009

36

13

23

42

22

20

22


Biomass

2011

30

14

17

12

7

6

57


2009

28

12

16

12

8

4

60


Note: Percentages may not add up to 100% due to rounding













TABLE 3

AGREE OR DISAGREE WITH VARIOUS ENERGY-RELATED STATEMENTS AND ISSUES

"How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements?"


Base: All adults



AGREE (NET)

Strongly agree

Somewhat agree

DISAGREE (NET)

Somewhat disagree

Strongly disagree

Not at all sure


%

%

%

%

%

%

%


Nuclear power plant waste is a national issue

69

47





--
Scott's Contracting
scottscontracting@gmail.com
http://stlouisrenewableenergy.blogspot.com
http://scottscontracting.wordpress.com


Efficiency First


2010 MCE E-Alert Header
Donate Now

Follow us on:
Find us on Facebook  Follow us on Twitter
Upcoming Events

 

3/29 - Conservation Lobby Day

Earth Share of Missouri

Better Business Bureau Seal

Japanese Disaster is Yet Another Reason
Why Ameren Must Pursue Efficiency First

 

Our sympathy goes out those who lost loved ones in last week's devastating earthquake and tsunami. As the Japanese reel from this disaster, they are now also under high alert for a nuclear reactor meltdown and radiation exposure.  

 

While members of the U.S. Congress are discussing a possible moratorium on new nuclear reactors until safety issues are addressed, the Missouri General Assembly is considering legislation that would allow Ameren Missouri to charge ratepayers $40 million for a permit for a second nuclear reactor in mid-Missouri.  

 

The proposed legislation would chip away at a 1976 ballot initiative supported 2-to-1 by Missouri voters. This law protects Missourians from investor-owned utilities charging ratepayers up-front for the construction of a power plant until it is producing electricity.  

 

To understand the many other reasons why SB 321 and SB 406 are bad public policy, read Senator Joan Bray's guest column in the Joplin Globe last month.

In short, Ameren admits it cannot find investors to fund the nuclear plant because it is too risky and expensive.   

 

Therefore, Ameren must pass SB 321 or SB 406 which shifts the financial risk of investment of a new nuclear plant from shareholders to ratepayers.  But while shareholders dodge the risk, they still receive a financial windfall if/when the reactor comes online and Ameren then sells the excess electricity out of state for a premium.    

 

History tells us only 50% of proposed nuclear reactors are completed and produce electricity in the U.S. These are not good odds for ratepayers who will have to pay for a new reactor whether or not it actually comes online.

 

The most frustrating thing about this proposition is that Ameren can easily meet Missouri's energy needs through energy efficiency instead of raising your electric rates to pay for a $6 billion nuclear reactor.  In the St. Louis Post Dispatch on February 25, Steve Kidwell, Ameren Missouri Vice President of Regulatory Affairs, said:  

 

"If we went after the potential that we've seen in our own study,  

we wouldn't have to build another power plant for 20 years, and  

we could retire Meramec, and we'd be OK.  But we'd lose  

$30 million a year. And we just can't do that. It's that simple."  

 

So at the end of the day, Ameren's own numbers show that an aggressive energy efficiency plan will keep electric bills lower than other energy options. But, the company's sole concern is shareholder profits.

 

Kidwell's concern about loss revenue has been addressed through new rules developed by the Public Service Commission this year. Utilities are now reimbursed for costs associated with implementing efficiency programs and for revenue they lose when the efficiency programs cause customers to buy less power.  

 

Ameren's goal is to charge you, the ratepayer, millions of dollars up front for an unnecessary, risky, and expensive power plant rather than investing in the cheapest energy resource available, energy efficiency.    

 

Now is the time to get involved!  Attend Conservation Lobby Day on Tuesday, March 29 and speak to state legislators about this issue and other critical environmental policies.  

 

Ed Smith
Missouri Coalition for the Environment  

No-CWIP Coordinator 







--
Scott's Contracting
scottscontracting@gmail.com
http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.blogspot.com
http://scottscontracting.wordpress.com


Latest News on Missouri Nuclear Reactor Agenda


Nuclear siting bill awaits committee action (AUDIO))

by Bob Priddy on March 31, 2011 cross-posted via: Missourinet

Four bills focused on how to pay to pick a site for a second commercial nuclear power plant are stuck in a Senate Committee.  Senator Jason Crowell, the sponsor of one of the bills, chairs the committee that held a seven-hour public hearing about three weeks ago. The committee has not considered whether to recommend full senate debate.

For him, the big issue is who will pay for the site selection.  He thinks the utility company and its stockholders should bear that cost.

The sponsor of one of the proposals, Jefferson City Senator Mike Kehoe, thinks most senators are comfortable with having consumers pay for the site selection—but be repaid if no site is picked or no plant goes into operation.

Crowell worries that having consumers pay for the site selection is the first step toward repealing the construction work in progress law that says consumers won't be billed for construction costs until the plant is running.  Kehoe says he favors whichever approach is the most economical way to build the plant.

Kehoe comments 7:38 mp3                   crowell comments 4:03 mp3


--
Scott's Contracting
scottscontracting@gmail.com
http://stlouisrenewableenergy.blogspot.com
http://scottscontracting.wordpress.com




Electronic Recycling News for the St Louis Area

For People in the St Louis Area with Electronics ready for Recycling there are two future events to recycle your old Electrical Devices

Spectrum Ecycle

Saturday, April 9, 2011

12:00-3:00pm

Wildhorse Subdivision, Wildhorse Parkway

Chesterfield, MO 63005

Learn More

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Saturday, May 21, 8am - 6pm

Kirkwood High School

Learn More

Original Content provided by:

weekly e-news from StLouisGreen.com!








--
Scott's Contracting
scottscontracting@gmail.com
http://stlouisrenewableenergy.blogspot.com
http://scottscontracting.wordpress.com


Solar Advocates Using Momentum from Fukushima Accident


As the Fukushima nuclear crisis grinds painfully on, advocates of solar power are using it as political ammunition to maintain government aid to the sector

Past aid is having an impact.

Bloomberg reports that our sunniest climes can now obtain solar energy for the same price as grid energy. It's no longer a niche product, and solar panel sales are growing as fast as the iPad.

The only clouds on the horizon come in the form of declining subsidies. But what bears don't realize is that, with better materials and scaled manufacturing, the need for such subsidies is also declining.

The excuse of fossil fuel advocates, that subsidies are unaffordable, now has a ready answer – China. You want to fall behind China? We're already behind China, according to a new Pew survey. You want to fall further behind? And China is doubling its targets for solar energy.

Who lost to China? Opponents of solar energy, that's who.

Not that die-hard fossil fuel advocates aren't trying. Douglas MacIntyre, former editor in chief of Financial World, insists it doesn't matter who leads in alternative energy, that coal and nuclear are the future, end of discussion full-stop.

That may be a practical argument, but it's a political loser, full-stop. The challenge for the renewable industry is to make those who make such arguments pay a political price for them, as happened over the weekend in southwest Germany, which actually put Greens in power for the first time over the energy issue.

This was no ordinary state election, by the way. I visited the state last year and have distant relatives there. It's a very prosperous and conservative place. Christian Democrats had a monopoly on power going back 58 years. You might compare the result to someone like Howard Dean winning the South Carolina governorship.

California knows which way the wind is blowing on energy. Its legislature has finally passed a bill aiming to bring in one-third of the state's energy from renewable sources by 2020. The state's utilities just missed their 2010 target of 20%, but that's still double other states' 2020 targets.

Thus solar bills are coming up in very unexpected places. South Carolina has considered a solar subsidy bill. North Carolina is looking to double its utilities' purchase of solar. Politicians who know which way the Sun is shining are climbing on board.

Now if we could just get the President off his natural gas kick...

What are you seeing on the ground, where you live? Are politicians talking up solar over nuclear? Are orders increasing? Or is this just another green mirage?

By Dana Blankenhorn
--
Scott's Contracting
scottscontracting@gmail.com
http://stlouisrenewableenergy.blogspot.com
http://scottscontracting.wordpress.com



Solar energy in the U.S. breaks another record





Growth and Opportunity Shines on the U.S. Solar Energy Industry in 2010

Dear Readers,

In case you haven't already heard, the American solar energy industry broke another record in 2010, installing enough new solar electric capacity to power almost 200,000 homes.  This more than doubles our record year in 2009. In addition, more than 65,000 solar water and pool heating systems were installed across the country in 2010. All told, the industry grew by 67 percent from $3.6 billion in 2009 to $6 billion in 2010.

The free executive summary of the 2010 Solar Market Insight: Year in Review from SEIA® and GTM Research details the growth of the U.S. solar industry, whether you're interested in photovoltaic (PV) systems on rooftops, CSP plants in the desert, or solar water heating on businesses. We now release a quarterly version of this report, so be sure to check back for the latest solar market information.

You may be surprised to learn that the solar industry is growing fastest in states like New Jersey and Pennsylvania. Sixteen states installed more than 10 megawatts of PV in 2010, up from only four in 2007. California is still a big market, but Nevada, Arizona, Colorado, Pennsylvania, New Mexico, Florida, Texas and others are catching up.

Thank you for advocating for solar in 2010. Your phone calls, emails and letters worked to make our voices heard on Capitol Hill like never before. We could not have accomplished all we did without you. Keep checking your email - with your help, we can make 2011 another blue ribbon year for solar energy!

Tom Kimbis
Director of Policy & Research, SEIA

See SEIA Statement on Report Highlights
Read Executive Summary
Learn more about the Full Report

P.S. See our new 60-second Public Service Announcement on the benefits of solar energy. It's already been broadcast more than 250 times across the nation!



--
Scott's Contracting
scottscontracting@gmail.com
http://stlouisrenewableenergy.blogspot.com
http://scottscontracting.wordpress.com








Connect with Scotts Contracting

FB FB Twitter LinkedIn Blog Blog Blog Blog Pinterest