-- Scotts Contracting - StLouis Renewable Energy: Super Insulation

Search This Blog

Showing posts with label Super Insulation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Super Insulation. Show all posts

10.25.2010

Insulation: Guidelines, Facts, Applications,

ABOUT INSULATION

Thicker is better In cold weather, a puffy parka holds in your body heat. Insulation does the same thing for a house. The thicker the insulation, the better it works to reduce heat flow from the inside of a home to the outside during winter, and from outside to inside during summer.
The thermal barrier of a home should consist of a continuous layer of insulation on all sides—including the lowest floor, the exterior walls, and the ceiling or roof.

Doubling the thickness of insulation will double the insulation's R-value, cutting heat loss in half. Each time the insulation layer is doubled in thickness, this rule applies. The energy saved per year by doubling insulation from R-10 to R-20, however, will be considerably more than the energy saved by doubling insulation from R-20 to R-40, because of the law of diminishing returns. In some cases, like an attic, it's worth piling on more insulation because there is plenty of room. It's much more expensive to add that much insulation to exterior walls.

It takes more than just insulation to slow heat Stopping air leaks is just as important—maybe more important—than adding insulation. Unless builders prevent air from leaking through walls and ceilings, insulation alone won't do much good. Not only are drafts uncomfortable, but air moving through insulated cavities can cut the efficiency of the insulation by as much as 50%.
Some insulation types make good air barriers, and some don't. In all cases, it's best to keep the insulation tight to the air barrier.

THERMAL BRIDGING IS CONDUCTION IN ACTION

When there is no insulation in a roof or wall, the framing is the most insulated part of the assembly. It has the highest R-value. Softwood lumber has an R-value of 1.25 per inch, so a 2x6 stud has an R-value of almost 7. As soon as you put insulation between the studs or rafters above R-7, however, the framing becomes the weak thermal link. If the framing cavities are filled with closed-cell spray foam insulation, the insulation has an R-value of about 36. At that point, the studs or rafters become a glaring weakness in the design.

Building scientists call this phenomenon "thermal bridging" because the studs or rafters bridge the space between inside and outside the thermal envelope.

If you look for it, thermal bridging can sometimes be seen from either inside or outside. Inside, it can cause a problem called ghosting, or cold stripes behind the drywall during winter. These cold stripes can encourage condensation that leads to the accumulation of dust particles on the drywall; eventually, visible vertical stripes may form. Outside, you can see the effect of thermal bridging in snow-melt patterns on roofs and drying patterns on walls.

A continuous layer of rigid foam installed on the inside or outside of a wall or roof drastically reduces thermal bridging through the framing.

R-VALUE MEASURES HOW WELL INSULATION WORKS

Heat flows from hot to cold; it can't be stopped, but it can be slowed If we measure the rate at which heat flows through a building material or building assembly—for example, a wall or a roof—we can calculate a number (the R-value) to indicate its insulating ability. The higher a material's R-value, the better the material is at resisting heat flow through conduction, convection, and radiation (outlined above). Insulation manufacturers report R-values determined by tests following ASTMstandards (for example, ASTM C518).

Common insulation types and their R-values Residential insulation materials have R-values that range from about 3 to 7 per inch. The amount of insulation installed in any given building assembly depends on the climate, the part of the house being insulated, the project budget, and local code requirements.
  • Batts and blankets: R-3.1 to R-4.1 per in.
  • Blown-in and loose-fill insulation: R-2.6 to R-4.2 per in.
  • Rigid foam: R-3.6 to R-6.8 per in.
  • Closed-cell spray foam: R-6 to R-6.8 per in.
  • Open-cell spray foam: R-3.5 to R-3.6 per in.
Green homes go beyond code minimum
The U.S. Department of Energy has developed a list of recommended insulation levels for different climate zones. The climate zones are represented on the map (click to enlarge). Houses heated by natural gas, fuel oil, or an electric heat pump should use the R-values set out by the DOE and listed below as a base. Because electric heat is relatively expensive, houses with electric resistance heat need more insulation than shown in the table below.

In some parts of the country, minimum code requirements for insulation already (or may soon) exceed these DOE recommendations. For example, the 2009 International Residential Code requires cold-climate builders to include a minimum of R-20 wall insulation and R-15 basement wall insulation.

DOE-Department of Energy-recommended R-values for various parts of a house
ZoneAtticWall Floor Slab edge Basement wall (framing cavity insulation) Basement wall (continuous rigid insulation)
1 R-30 to R-49R-13 to R-15R-13R-4R-11R-10
2-3 R-30 to R-60R-13 to R-15R-13 to R-25R-8R-11R-10
4 R-38 to R-60R-16 to R-21R-25 to R-30R-8R-11R-4
5 R-38 to R-60R-16 to R-27R-25 to R-30R-8R-11 to R-19R-10 to R-15
6-8R-49 to R-60R-18 to R-27R-25 to R-30R-8R-11 to R-19R-10 to R-15

In any case, green builders almost always exceed minimum code requirements for insulation thickness. Many energy consultants, including Betsy Pettit and Joseph Lstiburek, now recommend that cold-climate homes include R-60 ceilings, R-40 above-grade walls, R-20 basement walls, and R-10 basement slabs.

Some builders go further; for example, an Illinois home designed to meet the rigorous German Passivhaus standard is insulated to nearly R-60 on every side—even under the slab.

AIR AND MOISTURE ARE PART OF THE PICTURE

Insulation can't work in a wind tunnel No matter what type of insulation you choose, it will perform poorly if installed in a house that is riddled with air leaks. Because many types of insulation (like loose fill and batts) work by trapping air, leaky walls, roofs, and floors mean poor thermal performance. For this reason, building scientists are fanatical about air-sealing. To get the most out of batts and blown insulation, every house needs an air barrier adjacent to or contiguous with the insulation layer.
Some types of insulation are fairly effective at stopping air infiltration. For example, when rigid foam is used as wall sheathing, it can be an effective barrier, as long as the seams are taped. Spray polyurethane foam creates a very effective air barrier.

But neither rigid foam nor spray foam addresses air leaks at the seams where different components meet, such as under the bottom plates of walls. An air barrier is only effective if all of these seams and intersections are addressed with gaskets, glues, or sealants.

Of all available insulation materials, fiberglass batts are the most permeable to air leakage—so permeable that fiberglass is used to make furnace air filters. Because it doesn't restrict air flow, fiberglass is often singled out and derided for its poor performance.

In fact, much of the criticism of fiberglass insulation is unwarranted. As long as fiberglass is installed in a house with an adequate air barrier, it will perform well. Fiberglass performs best when installed in a framing cavity (for example, a stud bay or joist bay) with an air barrier on all six sides.
Installation details for high-quality fiberglass batts have been incorporated into the insulation installation guidelines established by the home raters from the Residential Energy Services Network (RESNET).

For every location in a house, there are always several ways to create an effective air barrier. However, not all methods are equally easy to achieve. In many locations, including rim-joist areas, spray polyurethane foam is so much faster than alternative methods that its use has become almost universal among builders of high-performance homes.

Moisture can piggyback on air There's another benefit to stopping air: less moisture in roofs and walls. That's because most moisture problems in walls and roofs are caused by moisture transported by air. Vapor diffusionis a much smaller problem.

Moisture can accumulate in a wall or ceiling when warm, humid interior air leaks through cracks in the shell. When this exfiltrating air encounters a cold surface—for example, OSB wall sheathing—the moisture in the air can condense into liquid and puddle in the wall cavity. The same thing can happen in summer, when warm, humid outdoor air leaks through cracks in the wall. If the home is air-conditioned, the moisture in this infiltrating air can condense when it reaches any cool surface—drywall, ductwork, etc. The best way to limit this type of moisture migration is to install an effective air barrier. If air isn't leaking through cracks in a home's walls and ceilings, the problem is nipped in the bud.

Insulation can stop air Some insulation types act as air barriers, while others act like air filters. If you choose an insulation that doesn't stop air flow, it's important to install an adjacent air barrier material.

Best to worst at stopping airflow: Spray foam Rigid foam Cellulose Blown-in fiberglass Fiberglass batts

SHOULD INSULATION STOP VAPOR?

Vapor permeability can be a good thing or a bad thing — vapor retarders slow wetting, but they also slow drying, which may be more important. As long as you design a roof, wall, or floor assembly with these concepts in mind, then almost any type of insulation can work.

Least to most vapor permeable: Foil-faced polyisocyanurate Closed-cell spray foam XPS EPS Open-cell spray foam Cellulose Blown-in fiberglass Fiberglass batts

More on the vapor permance of insulation materials at BuildingScience.com.

INSULATE OUTSIDE THE BOX

Although residential wall insulation is traditionally installed in stud cavities, the best place to locate wall insulation is outside the frame. This exterior insulation reduces the thermal-bridging effect that studs have in a wall, because each piece of framing can act as a thermal bridge through the cavity insulation. These thermal bridges seriously degrade the performance of the wall.

The thermal-bridging effect can be partially addressed by using rigid foam sheathing—usually 1 in. or 2 in. of XPS or polyisocyanurate. Even better are wall designs that place all the insulation—6 in. to 10 in. of rigid foam—outside the framing.

When insulation is outside the frame, framing materials stay warm and dry. When stud bays are not filled with insulation, the work of electricians and plumbers is greatly simplified.
Houses with foam sheathing should not include an interior polyethylene vapor retarder.

OTHER CONSIDERATIONS

Insulation can stop air Some insulation types act as air barriers, while others act like air filters. If you choose an insulation that doesn't stop air flow, it's important to install an adjacent air barrier material.
Best to worst at stopping airflow: Spray foam Rigid foam Cellulose Blown-in fiberglass Fiberglass batts


SHOULD INSULATION STOP VAPOR?

Vapor permeability can be a good thing or a bad thing — vapor retarders slow wetting, but they also slow drying, which may be more important. As long as you design a roof, wall, or floor assembly with these concepts in mind, then almost any type of insulation can work.


Least to most vapor permeable: Foil-faced polyisocyanurate Closed-cell spray foam XPS EPS Open-cell spray foam Cellulose Blown-in fiberglass Fiberglass batts


More on the vapor permance of insulation materials at BuildingScience.com.


INSULATE OUTSIDE THE BOX

Although residential wall insulation is traditionally installed in stud cavities, the best place to locate wall insulation is outside the frame. This exterior insulation reduces the thermal-bridging effect that studs have in a wall, because each piece of framing can act as a thermal bridge through the cavity insulation. These thermal bridges seriously degrade the performance of the wall.


The thermal-bridging effect can be partially addressed by using rigid foam sheathing—usually 1 in. or 2 in. of XPS or polyisocyanurate. Even better are wall designs that place all the insulation—6 in. to 10 in. of rigid foam—outside the framing.


When insulation is outside the frame, framing materials stay warm and dry. When stud bays are not filled with insulation, the work of electricians and plumbers is greatly simplified.
Houses with foam sheathing should not include an interior polyethylene vapor retarder.


OTHER THERMAL BRIDGES


Uninsulated slab edges Window frames Wall and roof penetrations

--contact for additional details Scott's Contracting scottscontracting@gmail.com

9.13.2010

Re: Guest Post: Touch n Seal, Insulation- Local Manufacturer

Weatherize Your Home with Touch ‘n Seal Insulating Foam Sealants
Air Sealing Your Home with Insulating Foam Saves Money and Energy


Hi Scotty – I just discovered your website and blog – love it!!  I work in public relations for Fenton-based Touch ‘n Seal and wanted to submit this press release to you for publication consideration.

Thanks!
Carolyn Schinsky
Ryan Public Relations
(314) 822-9784 Office
(314) 308-1682 Cell



 NEWS RELEASE

Media Contacts:
Carolyn Schinsky / Ryan PR / 314-822-9784/ carolyn@ryan-pr.com



  Weatherize Your Home with Touch ‘n Seal Insulating Foam Sealants
Air Sealing Your Home with Insulating Foam Saves Money and Energy
 
ST. LOUIS—Sept. 13, 2010—It’s common knowledge that air leaks from drafty windows and gaps and cracks around the house can cause even a well-insulated home’s energy bills to soar.  All year long, a leaky house wastes energy and creates an often uncomfortable living environment.  However, weatherizing a home by sealing air leaks, gaps and cracks with Touch ‘n Seal insulating foam sealants and products can reduce energy loss by up to 38 percent.

“The first step in weatherizing a home is to determine where air leakage is occurring,” says Michael Sites, Product Specialist at Touch ‘n Seal.   “Some leaks around windows and doors may be obvious, but be sure to also inspect for cracks and gaps around places like electrical outlets, plumbing pipes, dryer vents and phone jacks.” 

Touch 'n Seal No-Warp FoamNo Warp Window & Door Foam Stops Drafts to Minimize Energy Loss

One of the most common sources of air leaks are drafty windows and doors.  However, Touch ‘n Seal’s gun-applied No-Warp Window & Door Insulating Sealant provides a quick and easy solution to this age-old problem.   No-Warp is a bright white expanding one-component polyurethane foam that is specially formulated for use around window and door frames – providing airtight insulation that blocks drafts, moisture and insects without bowing the frame.

“NoWarp is a great fenestration foam sealant because it expands fully to seal gaps and cracks, but won’t put undue pressure on window and door frames,” says Sites. “Most foams are inappropriate for use in these areas, because the excessive pressure can warp frames and jambs, rendering the window or door inoperable.”

 Constant Pressure Dispensing System Delivers More Spray Foam, Twice as Fast 

Air sealing with spray foam insulation creates a barrier that holds in heat in the winter months and keeps home cooler in the summer. Commonly used for weatherproofing attics, walls, ceilings and crawl spaces, spray foam provides CPDS 1000superior efficiency because it expands to fit the applied area, completely preventing drafts and air infiltration that can let dust, pollen and allergens into the structure.

Contractors can cut costs when applying spray foam insulation and enhance service offerings with Touch ‘n Seal’s new CPDS 1000 Constant Pressure Dispensing System.  The CPDS 1000 is a self-contained, portable, constant pressure spray foam system that dispenses Class I fire retardant, thermal insulating and sound dampening 2-component polyurethane spray foam – twice as fast as foam kits. As contractors around the country are discovering, the CPDS 1000 is an affordable alternative to buying or hiring a foam dispensing truck, saving both time and money.
 

With an internal air compressor, the CPDS 1000 operates on a standard 120V power supply.  “Efficiency, energy savings and environmental awareness are key factors when weatherizing a home or building,” states Sites. “The CPDS 1000 is the culmination of all these things – it provides reduced chemical waste, reduced fossil fuel consumption, reduced overall energy consumption and no ozone depleting chemicals.” 

Air-Seal & Resist Flames with Gun Foam II Sealant

Most homes have a multitude of unnoticed sources of energy loss.  Some leaks that often get overlooked are cracks and gaps in basement and foundation walls, Gun Foam II Polyurethane foam sealantdropped ceilings over cabinets and attic chases – small enclosures around ducts and plumbing - all which lead to skyrocketing energy bills.   “Air-sealing floor penetrations and air leaks in walls with Touch ‘n Seal’s Gun Foam II Insulating Sealant is a quick and easy way to prevent energy loss,” says Sites. “It provides weatherization in a variety of areas common in most residential construction.”

Gun Foam II is ideal for use at the juncture of the sill and the slab or foundation, and any penetration through floors or ceilings such as electrical lines, HVAC ducting or pipes. It fills cracks and holes in the exterior sheeting (due to poor application or penetrations made for utility services), at the corner and tee joints in framing, and any other place where air might penetrate the exterior envelope.

Touch ‘n Seal Gun Foam II Insulating Sealant is a gun-applied, bright orange one-component polyurethane foam that is more cost effective and easier to install than traditional fire blocking methods such a s gypsum, cement or fiberglass.  Though not a firestop, Gun Foam II withstands flaming over twice as long as the leading competitor, lending crucial seconds to dangerous situations.

“Weatherizing a home not only makes it more comfortable, the long term financial rewards are significant. In addition to saving money on energy bills, when Congress passed the stimulus bill earlier this year, it tripled the tax credit for weatherization home improvements through 2010,” concludes Site. 

# # #

About Touch ‘n Seal:
Convenience Products, the manufacturer of Touch ‘n Seal products, is headquartered in St. Louis, Missouri.   Touch ‘n Seal insulating foams and sealants are the benchmark for performance in commercial and industrial building and maintenance, OEM manufacturing and specialty applications. A full line of one and two-component spray foams, caulks and adhesives are available, including fire blocking foam  (ICC-ES: ESR-1926), Low Pressure Window & Door Foam, Drywall Panel Adhesives, Two-Component, Disposable Units, Mining Specialty Units, One-Component Disposable Cylinders and Fire Break Caulks.  The company also manufactures Touch ‘n Foam one-component foams for the do-it-yourself market.  For more information, visit http://www.touch-n-seal.com.

Thanks!
Carolyn Schinsky
Ryan Public Relations
(314) 822-9784 Office
(314) 308-1682 Cell



--
Scott's Contracting
scottscontracting@gmail.com


4.30.2010

Retrofit reduces energy use by 60 percent

Pilot Project Super Insulation for Older Homes at Massachusetts home
You could call it an "Extreme Makeover: Energy-Efficient Edition."


In Arlington, Mass., Alex Cheimets and Cynthia Page live in a duplex that used to consume about 1,400 gallons of heating oil a year. Now their building will soon be one of the most energy-efficient in its New England neighborhood, thanks to a pilot project that retrofitted the structure with almost $100,000 worth of insulation and other products to increase energy efficiency and decrease utility costs.

The so-called Massachusetts Super Insulation Project seeks to determine the benefits and cost effectiveness of retrofitting old energy-wasting houses with insulation upgrades in key areas. Though the cost for the upgrades in the home were substantial, some of the techniques used—such as proper air-sealing and adequate moisture barriers—could easily be applied to new construction and for not much more money.

Massachusetts officials are keenly interested in the results of the project, which dovetails with the state’s efforts to become more energy-efficient. “Our governor, the state House and Senate, and the executive branch are aware that the nation’s energy strategy is not acceptable, and a big part of it is the existing housing stock,” says Philip Giudice, commissioner of the state's Department of Energy Resources.

“Nationally, buildings account for 40 percent of all energy consumption and one-third of all greenhouse gas emissions,” says Energy and Environmental Affairs Secretary Ian Bowles, who chairs Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick’s Zero Net Energy Buildings Task Force. “This super-insulation project in Arlington promises to be a model for the type of innovation in the building industry that the Patrick administration hopes will soon be widespread across Massachusetts.”

The public/private effort includes the state Department of Energy Resources, the local utility NStar Electric & Gas, and a number of building product sponsors.

Bowles is right, of course. As green building practices spread through the new construction market, America’s existing housing stock remains an energy-use problem. Millions of these old structures lose large amounts of energy through leaky windows, inefficient heating and cooling units, and poorly insulated walls, all of which contribute to higher-than-necessary utility bills. The 3,200-square-foot Cheimets/Page building—divided into one condo for Cheimets and his family and one for Page—was one of these structures.

At one point when home heating oil in the Massachusetts area hit $4.69 a gallon, Cheimets says, the homeowners were paying a combined total of almost $6,500 a year for heating and hot water. “We needed to replace our siding and our roof soon anyway,” Cheimets says. “As a duplex, we could simply do the minimum or we could invest now to save later. Super-insulation was the better financial investment.”


The parties in the pilot wanted to demonstrate that it’s possible to bring an existing building up to the highest standards of energy performance. In addition to reducing energy use by between 65 percent and 70 percent, the group was also interested in exploring super-insulation as part of an overall program of energy efficiency and carbon reduction. Finally, it hoped to use the Arlington, Mass., pilot project to determine cost-effective retrofit recommendations for homeowner renovations; develop experience with and collect performance results for existing structures; and establish criteria for future state programs supporting residential super-insulation projects.


Before the work commenced, the project team consulted with Somerville, Mass.-based Building Science Corp., which performed energy parametric simulations, analysis, and economic payback comparisons of various energy retrofits options.

As a result, the extensive retrofit focused on tightening the building envelope, which included new doors and the replacement of the single pane windows. The team installed double-pane Pella fiberglass windows with low-E glazing, Tyvek stucco wrap, two layers of 2-inch Dow closed-cell foam board, furring strips, and NuCedar cellular PVC siding. They ripped off the old roof and installed two layers of 3-inch foam board on the roof deck, followed by plywood sheathing, and light-colored asphalt shingles. They also sprayed Icynene open-cell foam in the attic roof and in the basement rim joists and ceiling. Finally, the team installed a heat recovery ventilator and an on-demand water heater.

Cheimets says the upgrade have made a big difference in the comfort level of the units and in the performance of the building. “I felt the difference immediately,” he says. “There are fewer drafts and no cold spots; that’s all gone away, and we have seen about a 60 percent reduction in energy use.”

As part of the pilot project, DER and NStar have installed sensors to monitor real-time oil usage as well as temperature and humidity levels inside and outside the house. “We were using about nine gallons a day before, but now we’re using three on average,” Cheimets says.

The reduction in the building’s ongoing energy use has come at a steep one-time price tag. Overall, the retrofit cost more than $90,000, and like most renovation projects, ended up being more expensive than expected in different areas.

For example, the cost for the roof replacement was first estimated at $10,000, but the price tag nearly doubled by an additional $9,000 with the addition of super-insulation. Replacing the siding was projected to run $30,000, but it increased by $41,000 with super-insulation and re-flashing the windows. An additional $6,000 went toward the installation of expanding foam in the basement ceiling; $4,000 paid for heat recovery ventilators.

“If you look at the additional cost of super insulating (compared with just doing the required work in ‘standard’ fashion) doing this work is an additional cost of $50,000, or $25,000 per family” in the two-unit duplex, according to program documents.

While the costs are high, Cheimets says they should be taken in context of retrofitting an 80-year-old house that featured 50 windows and suffered from bad insulation from the start. Doing such upgrades in new construction would be cheaper. “If you’re building a new house, you would be taking certain things into consideration like facing the roof south, using fewer windows, and decreasing the amount of angles in the roof,” he says.

John Dennis Murphey agrees that using such strategies would absolutely make such a remodel cheaper. “That’s what we’re doing now on one house,” says the principal of Chevy Chase, Md.-based Meditch Murphey Architects.

There are also other ways to save money on such a project. Murphey, for example, has eliminated conventional sheathing from his houses all together. Instead, he uses 2 x 6 studs, spray foam insulation, and metal bracing to make the studs rigid. “The studs are energy highways,” he says. He then wraps his houses in 1.5 inches of foam board, which creates a thermal break.

Instead of simply balking at the added costs, though, Murphey says builders and consumers should look at the overall project and the long-term benefits. “Energy prices have come down, but who knows where the price of oil will go,” he continues. “My bet is that they will go up. I’ll take that bet every time.”

Members of the Super Insulation Project would probably agree. It is estimated that the annual savings to the homeowners will be $2,350 to $4,000 per year. “At the current heating oil cost of approximately $2.35 a gallon, it's a 20-year payback,” program documents say. “But a few short weeks ago the price was closer to $4 a gallon, and the price of oil is likely to rise again in the coming years, dramatically shortening the payback period.”


By:Nigel F. Maynard, Senior Editor, products, at BUILDER magazine.
Contact scotty@stlouisrenewableenergy.com or scottscontracting@gmail.com for your Green Building Needs.  Addition Green Building information can be found at http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.com/

Connect with Scotts Contracting

FB FB Twitter LinkedIn Blog Blog Blog Blog Pinterest