-- Scotts Contracting - StLouis Renewable Energy

Search This Blog

7.13.2010

USA Bills BP for $ 221.9 Million Total

by Scottys Calculations
99.7Million in Current Charges + (plus) (3 Prior Paid Bills totaling: 99.7)= $221.9 Million US.  This Oil Spill shows how deep the pockets BP Oil Company is/are. 

  • This cost would break the backs of a normal business. 
  • How in the World is BP continuing to operate after paying such a Bill? 
  • How much is this company charging for the Oil they Produce if they can pay bills such as are being levied against them. 
  • I'm dearly afraid that the buck will be passed onto "We" the consumer in the end. 
  • Stay Tuned for more info!


Obama administration bills BP for $99.7 million

Posted Tue Jul 13, 2010 11:41am PDT



(yahoo)-WASHINGTON - The Obama administration says it has sent a fourth bill to BP and other parties seeking $99.7 million for costs related to the response and cleanup of the Gulf oil spill.

The administration says three earlier bills, totaling $122.2 million, have been paid in full.

The White House has said all along that BP is responsible for the disaster and must pay all costs associated with the response to the spill, including efforts to stop the leak, reduce the oil's spread and the long-term recovery of the Gulf Coast region.

THIS IS A BREAKING NEWS UPDATE. Check back soon for further information. AP's earlier story is below.
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Obama administration says it has sent a fourth bill to BP and other parties seeking $99.7 billion for costs related to the response and cleanup of the Gulf oil spill.

The administration says three earlier bills, totaling $122.2 million, have been paid in full.

The White House has said all along that BP is responsible for the disaster and must pay all costs associated with the response to the spill, including efforts to stop the leak, reduce the oil's spread and the long-term recovery of the Gulf Coast region.


--
Scott's Contracting
scottscontracting@gmail.com
http://stlouisrenewableenergy.blogspot.com

Investing in Renewable Energy

Investors: Renewables Growth is Slower but Steady

Published: July 5, 2010

New York, New York In just one year, the story line for the renewable energy industry has been flipped on its head. Last summer, as investors tried to figure out the stimulus package, there was a lack of capital and a pent up demand for projects. This summer, there are far fewer projects being developed, but more willingness to lend from financiers.

Click to play  podcast

Because the sluggish economy has made some renewables less competitive, there's a "flight to quality" in the space, according to investors at this year's Renewable Energy Finance Forum in New York City.

"The capital is there..but having a project that can be financed is difficult. I think the developers are struggling. So we have not been as busy as we've been in the past," said Kevin Walsh, managing director of renewable energy at GE Energy Financial Services.

The combination of low fossil energy prices and lower demand for power has stymied growth in some sectors, particularly wind. In the U.S., wind installations are expected to fall by 40% this year. In Europe, installations will likely fall flat.

Solar PV will be the fastest growing industry, as it is less capital intensive, is faster to build out and does not face many of the same regulatory challenges as wind, geothermal and concentrating solar power. GE, which has been heavily involved in the wind space, is now looking to invest in large scale solar PV plants.

"We really like what we see in solar right now. That's going to be a greater focus for us as well," said Walsh.

Over the last 18 months, companies like GE have changed up their investment strategies. In 2008, tax equity was the project financing option of choice. Those were the days when tax equity players owed enough money in taxes to take advantage of the credits. Then the financial crisis hit, reducing the tax appetite of investors. The problem was particularly bad in the wind industry. Today, because of the grant program created by the stimulus package, the tool of choice is debt.

Last year, over $5 billion was invested in wind energy projects in the U.S. Only $1.8 billion of that was in the form of tax equity.

Many developers are borrowing against the cash grant to raise money for construction, then handing the payment over to the construction lender when the project is completed. The program has already helped bring about 4,200 MW of projects online.

Unfortunately, fewer developers are now able to take advantage of the grant program because there is less demand for their energy. Even so, it's been a lifeline for the industry in the last 12 months.

Keith Martin, an attorney with Chadbourne and Parke, said that investors are very comfortable with the grant program. The big unknown is what will happen when the grant program expires at the end of this year. Most people in the industry are calling for an extension of the program until 2012, saying that the industry will shrink without it.

"The levers of public policy in Washington are broken. I just don't know if something will happen this year," said Martin. "[investors] have to be savvy about this. You have to look at parts of the market that can stand on their own...without the support of public policy."

That's pretty much every technology.

According to figures from the International Energy Agency released earlier this month, fossil energies got about $550 billion in subsidies in 2008, compared to $50 billion for renewables. With such heavy support for fossil energies, renewables will continue to be dependent on public policy.

Investors are watching the (seemingly always) uncertain policy debate in Washington, wondering how it will impact their current strategies. Without the grant program, a national target or a price on carbon, renewables may look less attractive to investors. The large shale gas finds in the U.S. – which will likely keep natural gas prices low for many years to come – are also going to impact the economics of renewable energy projects.

Michael Liebreich, CEO of Bloomberg New Energy Finance, said that these are all factors that the industry must deal with. They are creating the "New Normal," where renewables grow at a more subdued and sustainable pace.

"We're neither in the depth of a trough, nor are we in an overheated stage. So this is a kind of normal year in the development of an industry," Liebreich said.

For a comprehensive overview of the financial health of the industry, take a listen to this week's podcast, linked above. We've got interviews with Kevin Walsh of GE; Michael Liebreich of Bloomberg New Energy Finance; Fintan Whelan of Mainstream Renewable Power; Keith Martin of Chadbourne and Parke; and Ken Westrick of 3TIER.



--
Scott's Contracting
scottscontracting@gmail.com
http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.blogspot.com
http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.com
scotty@stlouisrenewableenergy.com

Clash of Titans-Renewable Energy Control Wars

Scotty, Scotts Contracting: I hope this article will shed some insight into the US Grid system and how the Utility Companies view Alternative Energy Production from Solar, Wind and other Renewable Energy Producing Systems.

I feel that: when more Homes are producing Energy for their own personal use. It will lessen the Burden on Utility Companies- who in turn, would then be able to meet any Emergency Energy Demands. Because they are not being required to produce as much energy on an As-Needed basis and the Possibility of Large Scale Battery Back-Up Power. Or Better yet each home will become self sufficient and independent IE not connected to the Grid.

The Renewable Energy Control Wars: Clash of Titans

by Jon Previtali and Jon Guice, AltaTerra Research
Published: July 8, 2010

On June 25, we joined 500 executives at Stanford University for the 2010 Silicon Valley Energy Summit. The CEO of a large California utility company, Chris Johns of Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E), was the first keynote speaker. His topic was PG&E's effort to roll out 10 million smart meters. At an average rate of 15,000 installations each day, the devices are the first and most important pieces of PG&E's smart grid infrastructure. All PG&E customers will have electric and gas smart meters by the end of 2012.

Johns noted near-term benefits familiar to most of us: no physical meter reading, faster identification of grid faults, and most importantly, lower peak power as residential customers are given the double-edged sword of time-of-use rates and "near-time" energy pricing data for the purpose of managing their power use more cost effectively.

But to those of us who are thinking about the future through the lens of solar power and other distributed generation (DG), PG&E's venture into the emerging smart grid space could mean much more. Smart meters could become the communications and control gateway to two major areas of progress for the solar power industry:

1) An increase in solar power yield through better system monitoring and remote inverter repair.

2) The deployment of much higher photovoltaic (PV) penetrations than are currently allowed in power distribution networks.

Demand for accurate solar power system monitoring and remote repair has been increasing since the commercial solar market shifted to a Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) model in which PV system operators are paid for energy delivered. There is clear incentive to maximize generation and minimize downtime. Solar monitoring companies such as FST, Draker Labs, Energy Recommerce (now National Semiconductor), and Deck stepped up to serve this market, and PPA company SunEdison even introduced its own monitoring system.

This demand has also encouraged module and inverter companies to make customer relationships more "sticky" by bundling monitoring systems that work with portfolios of systems made for their products. Module companies such as SunPower and Suntech offer complete system packages with bundled monitoring systems. Inverter companies, including Satcon, PV Powered (now owned by Advanced Energy), and SMA, are dedicating more development cycles to monitoring, communications, and control features. We also expect utility supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) companies will start to support big new utility projects such as Southern California Edison's and PG&E's massively distributed 250 megawatt (MW) PV implementations.

The second initiative—high-penetration PV—has even higher stakes for the solar industry.

Today, grid operators get nervous when as much as a few percent of peak load is met by renewable energy (RE) within a distribution area served by a substation. As a result, we see rules across the country that directly limit the size of solar power systems and the amount of peak load that can be met by RE. Hawaii's most populous island, Oahu, is a good example. The following rule is taken from the North Carolina Solar Center's DSIRE Database:

For customers of Hawaiian Electric Company (HECO), the maximum individual system capacity is 100 kW. The aggregate capacity of net-metered systems is limited to 1% of HECO's peak demand. Of this 1% limit, 40% is reserved for systems 10 kW or smaller.

Rules like this hinder the growth of the solar power industry. Oahu has an estimated 1.2 gigawatts (GW) of peak load. The above rule reduces that 1.2 GW to 7.2 MW of commercial solar power systems allowed on the island. At 40 cents per kilowatt hour (kWh), a common revenue target after incentives, the maximum number of commercial solar power systems on Oahu would generate $4.3 million per year. Unfortunately, that's about what a single supermarket makes each year.

So, what's the problem? Hawaii's electricity comes mostly from foreign oil, they're ranked among the highest in greenhouse gas (GHG) emitting states, and they pay the highest price for electricity. Meanwhile, they have a lot of sun. It seems they would want PV everywhere. The explanation: they don't think their grid can handle that much solar power.

And they may be right. PV systems produce power at variable rates based on available sunlight. They also automatically disconnect from the grid when they sense poor power quality or no grid power. There is no reason for concern when solar power fluctuation is a small percent of total power on a distribution grid. However, if it becomes too large, grid operators are responsible for compensating for dips and spikes. The problem is they can't. Conventional power plants don't ramp quickly enough, and operators don't control customer demand.

Also, when distributed generation (DG) exceeds load in a substation area, it flows through transformers onto transmission lines—a prospect that makes grid operators shudder. Unless they've been upgraded to bidirectional relay equipment, substations are not equipped to handle "reverse flow," meaning operators cannot measure or throttle power flowing onto transmission lines. And, if a transmission line fails, blackouts can occur.

This happened in Europe in 2006 when one of two redundant German transnational high-voltage lines was "idled" to allow a newly built cruise liner to pass underneath. The ship was late, night came, and two factors arose that resulted in the automatic curtailment of 10 million customers: an unusual rise in demand due to a cold snap in the south, and a common upsurge in wind power from the north. Despite debate over the root cause, the failure spawned Germany's Medium Voltage Directive, which appears to be the first large-scale mandate of grid operator communications and control over third-party DG.

The directive gives grid operators the ability to remotely disable RE systems connected at 10-110 kilovolts (kV), requires power ramping to prevent harmful surges and dips, enables RE systems to ride through grid faults when linemen are clearly not at risk, and may require that inverters provide reactive power to correct voltage problems. The directive seems chiefly intended to manage wind power. It's yet to be seen if it will be necessary for solar power management, because PV conveniently generates during times when solar power is most likely to be consumed by adjacent loads.

In the U.S., a similar communications and control requirement is under development by the California Independent System Operator (CAISO), which proposed its version several months ago for RE systems connected to California's transmission system. Some industry prognosticators believe the CAISO requirements will also be adopted by utility grid operators to manage single systems and system portfolios in the MW range. Considering the concern among operators, this seems like a reasonable prediction, especially as California approaches its limit for net-metered DG, currently set at 5% of peak demand.

The race is on for communications and control within the RE industry. At AltaTerra, we've coined the phrase Distributed Generation Communications and Control (DGC2) to describe this burgeoning area of information technology. With the addition of automated control intelligence to system monitoring, we believe DGC2 will be essential for the coordination of all forms of DG with RE-supply and conventional demand forecasting, dynamic pricing, smart grid transmission and distribution components, SCADA systems, and a wide range of load-shedding smart grid devices yet to come. DGC2 will be the brains that direct these new and not-so-new technologies to work together to reduce peak load, dampen RE variability, and safeguard grid operations as we blow past the current limits to RE DG.

Jon Guice is the co-founder and Managing Director of Research at AltaTerra Research.

Jon Previtali has 13 years experience in product management, specializing in renewable energy and related fields such as energy efficiency, smart grid devices and energy storage. Prior to AltaTerra, at SunEdison, the largest generator of solar power in North America, Mr. Previtali managed the operations service for third-party systems, assisted in the development of the solar power fleet monitoring system and developed a high-penetration PV-grid integration strategy. Jon Previtali also launched SunEdison's channel partner program, which has resulted in over 100 MW of solar power projects and is today responsible for the majority of SunEdison's system construction. Earlier, Mr. Previtali was the Director of Product Management for Monitoring and Reporting Services at Digital Island, a leading Internet infrastructure firm. He holds a B.S. in Civil Engineering from Stanford (1993) and an M.S. in Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering from the University of Colorado, Boulder (2007).

The information and views expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily those of RenewableEnergyWorld.com or the companies that advertise on its Web site and other publications.

-- Scott's Contracting scottscontracting@gmail.com http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.blogspot.com http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.com scotty@stlouisrenewableenergy.com

Ten Clean Energy Stocks for 2010: Q2 Update




The dismal performance of renewable energy stocks so far this year is likely to lead to great buying opportunities in the rest of the year.
Published: July 12, 2010

In the six months since I published my annual clean energy mini-portfolio, it has far outperformed my industry benchmark, the Powershares Wilderhill Clean Energy Index (PBW). 2010 is the third year in a row that I've published a list of ten renewable and energy efficiency stocks that I expect to perform well over the coming year. The details on the list for 2010 are provided at the bottom of this article. This article is my second quarterly look back at the performance of the ten stocks so far this year. (See links to the PBW index and my first article on my 2010 list of clean energy stocks at the bottom of this page.)

These stocks are intended for small investors wanting to put some money in the sector, but not satisfied with the performance or holdings of clean energy mutual funds or clean energy exchange traded funds (ETFs). Please consult your investment advisor to decide if any or all of them are appropriate for your portfolio.

The diagram below shows the two versions of the my Ten Clean Energy Stocks for 2010 mini-portfolio, with the outer ring denoting an equal weight portfolio of ten stocks, including three energy efficiency stocks, three electric grid stocks, three alternative transportation stocks, and one biomass/waste to energy stock. The inner ring denotes a simplified portfolio, which substitutes the Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) for the three electric grid stocks and the Powershares Global Progressive Transport ETF (PTRP) for the three alternative transportation stocks. For future reference, I'll call the portfolio shown in the outer ring "10 stocks for 2010" and the portfolio shown in the inner ring "4 stocks plus 2 ETFs for 2010."

Performance

Since December 27th, the Russell 3000 broad market benchmark has fallen 3.67%, while the Powershares Wilderhill Clean Energy Index (PBW) has fallen 21.7%. Both portfolios are trailing the broad market by less than 2%, while outperforming the industry benchmark by almost 16%, producing a nearly identical -5.21% for the ten stocks for 2010 and -5.34% for the four stocks plus two ETFs for 2010.

Performance Chart

Coming Opportunities

While the performance against PBW is impressive, most investors would have probably been happier if they had simply stayed out of the market, or hedged their market exposure so far this year, which is exactly what I've been urging readers to do (see here, here, and here.) Although I saw some brief buying opportunities in clean energy at the end of May (I picked up a little Exide (XIDE) at $3.85 and US Geothermal (HTM) at $0.70) those opportunities were short-lived, and probably do not represent the market bottom for clean energy.

If the year continues to progress as I expect, the broad market will continue to decline, as will the clean energy sector. Individual clean energy stocks will likely continue to present excellent buying opportunities when the market as a whole has been declining rapidly. Buying opportunities in clean energy are likely to lead buying opportunities in the market as a whole, because the rapid decline of the whole clean energy sector over the last year is already producing great valuations. These great valuations broaden the appeal of clean energy stocks beyond the base of committed environmental investors, drawing in dyed-in-the-wool value investors who may not even think that Global Warming is happening, but know a good value stock when they see one.

I personally am still maintaining an overall short position in the market, but expect to be buying clean energy stocks with a focus on profitable micro-cap companies opportunistically.

Since these ten stocks have held up better than clean energy as a whole, we're liable to find fewer than average great buying opportunities in this list. C&D Technologies (CHP), currently trading at $0.95 is the best value I see among them at the moment, and this company may have already see its low for the year ($0.90 on June 10.)

One opportunity for short term gain may have just re-emerged in Portec Rail Products (PRPX). The company is the subject of a takeover bid from LB Foster (FSTR) which I covered in detail on June 1. The judge in a shareholder class action lawsuit lifted her earlier injunction blocking the merger on June 25th. The merger is not a done deal, however, since, as of May 28, only 59% of Portec shares had been tendered, and 65% are needed for the successful completion of the buyout. Foster may have to raise the offer price in order to consummate the deal.

Conclusion

At some point, I hope to be able to say it's time to buy this portfolio as a whole, but I think that time is not yet. Just the best strategy for the first six months of the year so far has been to stay in cash, and I think that will continue to be the best strategy for at least few more months. Now is still a time to remain mostly in cash, while keeping an eye out for individual buying opportunities.

DISCLOSURE: Long CHP, NFYIF, PRPX, WFIF, XIDE, HTM.

The information and views expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily those of RenewableEnergyWorld.com or the companies that advertise on its Web site and other publications.



--
Scott's Contracting
scottscontracting@gmail.com
http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.blogspot.com
http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.com
scotty@stlouisrenewableenergy.com

7.12.2010

Attention St Louis and Missouri Residents

Attention St Louis and Missouri Residents Please join us for the Gulf Voices event

An Exxon-Valdez every week.

That's the amount of oil that has been spilling into the Gulf. Yet already, news media coverage of the oil spill victims has faded -- and you know what that means. The motivation for our leaders to address our disastrous addiction to fossil fuels like oil is fading with it.

That's why on Wednesday, we're helping Gulf Coast residents come to St. Louis to share their stories. And we want to give you a chance to meet and speak with the very people who are living through the worst environmental disaster in our nation's history.

Please join us for the Gulf Voices event.

Schlafly Public Library (St. Louis, MO)
225 North Euclid Avenue
St. Louis, MO 63108

Wednesday, July 14, 2010
12:00 PM - 1:00 PM CDT

Click here to RSVP.

Linda Schuch from St. Petersburg, Florida shared her motivation for coming to Missouri and speaking:

"Between having a home on the water and opening a fish market that sells Gulf seafood, I have invested everything in our local environment. The disaster was my wakeup call to get off the side lines and try to work toward clean energy."

Linda's not alone. The thousands of stories like hers should be a wakeup call for America, but only if we help spread the word. Join us and don't forget to bring family and friends. Hear from Linda and others who have witnessed firsthand how America's dependence on oil and other fossil fuels hurts our economy, our environment and our way of life.

RSVP today: http://acp.repoweramerica.org/page/event/detail/repoweramericaevent/4v5z2

It's the human side of this tragedy and it's something you shouldn't miss.

Thanks,

Tracey Lewis
National Field Director
Repower America

--
Scott's Contracting
scottscontracting@gmail.com
http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.blogspot.com
http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.com
scotty@stlouisrenewableenergy.com

So-called "Climategate"

Hello:

Remember "Climategate?"  The so-called scandal where climate science deniers used stolen email messages to try to discredit forty years of established climate science?  The American press, led by the Wall Street Journal, ate it up -- playing right into the hands of the multimillion-dollar, fossil-fuel-funded climate denial industry. The Journal plastered sensationalist "Climategate" headlines everywhere and created doubt about well-proven scientific facts.

Last week, a third independent investigation exonerated the scientists involved and found that those emails contained no hidden conspiracy to fictionalize climate change. I just sent a letter to the editorial page of the Wall Street Journal demanding they set the record straight on climate change science.

Will you join me?

http://acp.climateprotect.org/climategate-taf

Thanks!

Climategate- Climate Change- Set the Record Straight

fromMaggie L. Fox, Alliance for Climate Protection <info@climateprotect.org>
to <scottscontracting@gmail.com>
dateMon, Jul 12, 2010 at 3:33 PM
subjectSet the record straight on so-called "Climategate"
mailed-bybounce.bluestatedigital.com

hide details 3:33 PM (2 hours ago)


Alliance for Climate Protection

Scotty,


Last week, a third independent investigation exonerated the climate scientists whose emails were hacked last fall -- finding the attacks lacked foundation. That's right: Three full, independent reviews have found no wrongdoing on the part of the scientists -- and most importantly, affirmed the scientific evidence of climate change.

So you might think that any reputable media outlet would feel compelled to set the record straight. But you'd be wrong.

In particular, the Wall Street Journal has published more than 30 editorials and op-eds on climate change since November of 2009. All took the stance that climate science was unreliable, dishonest or questionable -- or minimally unimportant. And unbelievably, just today, the Journal published another op-ed about the reviews, calling them a "whitewash" by "global warming alarmists."

Send a letter to the editor of the Wall Street Journal editorial page demanding that they set the record straight on climate change science.

It's vital that we receive balanced coverage from all of the media, and the Journal's actions matter. As Congress works to craft comprehensive policies to address our energy and climate crises, public understanding of this issue is more important than ever before.

A news outlet like the Wall Street Journal relies on its reputation as a balanced, unbiased news source. With your help, we can convince the Journal editorial page to give equal space to the fact that climate scientists have been exonerated and their findings remain affirmed.

Demand that the Wall Street Journal cover the facts about climate science.

Few news outlets in the U.S. are as well regarded and widely read among opinion makers and politicians as the Wall Street Journal. It has a responsibility to its readers and the American public to be fair and accurate on one of the most important issues of our time.

Balanced media coverage today won't give back the precious time we've lost defending scientific facts that should not have been in question. But perhaps it will remind our media outlets, including the Wall Street Journal, of their responsibility to the American people.

Thank you,

Maggie L. Fox
President and CEO
Alliance for Climate Protection

 
www.climateprotect.org

--
Scott's Contracting
scottscontracting@gmail.com
http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.blogspot.com
http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.com
scotty@stlouisrenewableenergy.com

Connect with Scotts Contracting

FB FB Twitter LinkedIn Blog Blog Blog Blog Pinterest

Featured Post

1 Hack To Eliminate Your A/C Power Bill This Summer!