-- Scotts Contracting - StLouis Renewable Energy

Search This Blog

9.21.2010

Pros and Cons: Asphalt Roofing vs. Metal

Product Pros and Cons: Asphalt Roofing vs. Metal

Asphalt shingles, such as these from CertainTeed, dominate new home construction and even the reroofing market because they are economical, easy to install, and last about 20 years. 
Asphalt shingles, such as these from CertainTeed, dominate new home construction and even the reroofing market because they are economical, easy to install, and last about 20 years. 
If you were to ask a sampling of production builders what is the best roofing material on the market, they're likely to tell you asphalt. The average residential architect, on the other hand, would probably say metal is the real deal. Heaven only knows what a home buyer or custom home client will choose—slate, clay, concrete—or if they'll even care.

The roof is arguably the most important surface in a home, perhaps even more essential than the exterior walls. As the most exposed plane, the roof has a mammoth task. It's under constant assault from the sun and rain, and, if leaky, could result in thousands of dollars worth of direct repair as well as ancillary damage. Still, a roof is one of those things that many consumers don't think about until there is a blizzard, hail storm, or rainstorm.

So what accounts for the discrepancy in material tastes? That builders, architects, and home buyers have opposing views of roofing material is telling, but their preferences speak to individual agendas as much as it speaks to the materials.

Most home buyers, for example, care mostly about price and don't care as much about material as long as the roof functions properly and for the foreseeable future. Production builders care about looks and function, too, but affordability is top of mind. And architects want a roof to function well, but they are concerned that it be aesthetically pleasing.

Naturally, the asphalt industry says its product is the best roofing you can buy. "Asphalt roofing is easy to find, easy to install, and easy to maintain," the Washington, D.C.-based Asphalt Roofing Manufacturers Association says. "It's also incredibly easy on the eye. And let's not forget, it's easy on the wallet, too!"

Indeed, asphalt is easy to install and produces a decent-looking roof, but most architects and builders say the product is popular mainly because it's economical.

Depending on the product line, shingles come with warranties lasting anywhere from 20 to 30 years, though builders in the field say the numbers are often shorter depending on the location of the country and maintenance.
The asphalt roofing industry makes a good case for its product being No. 1 because its product is No. 1. Industry estimates claim four out of five roofs are covered with asphalt, though if you drive around most subdivisions—new or established—that number seems woefully low.

Asphalt's market share notwithstanding, the metal people say their product is much better. According to the Metal Roofing Alliance in Belfair, Wash., "Longevity is one of the top reasons consumers report choosing metal roofing for their homes." The group says "metal roofing can last as long as 50 years or more, requiring very little maintenance and looking beautiful all the while."

When HUD's Partnership for Advancing Technology in Housing launched the Concept Home program some years ago, the group's mission was to use the best available materials, products, and technology for the homes it builds. The group settled on metal roofing for its subsequent homes in Omaha, Neb., and Charleston, S.C., because of the looks and the longevity—benefits that architects often cite as their reason for choosing the material. They are mesmerized by the crisp, contemporary look; that it lasts forever is gravy.
But longevity and good looks come with a very high price, one that turns off even ardent admirers of metal. "I use asphalt on all my projects," says Texas-based builder Robert Aiken. "Metal is a better roof, but it costs three times as much."

So where does that leave you? The tradeoffs are not so simple. Both materials are versatile, offering a variety of looks. But is it enough to specify an asphalt roof that should last 20 years or more? Or is it worth it to pay three times as much for metal that could outlive the homeowner and the house? Considering how long the average home buyer stays in a house, the answer may be simple.
Here's a handy guide that outlines the pros and cons of asphalt versus metal roofing. Use it to evaluate the options for your customers, and let us know what you use and why.

Asphalt comes in basic three-tab products, but higher-end, laminate shingles are also available.
Asphalt comes in basic three-tab products, but higher-end, laminate shingles are also available.

Pros for Asphalt Shingles:

An accepted and proven material that builders know and trust. There's a reason so many builders use the product, and it comes down to 100 years of service in the home building industry. Plus, home buyers are comfortable with it, which is extremely important.

Economical. The low cost of asphalt is probably its biggest selling point. A basic three-tab shingle roof might set you back about $100 to $200 per square (or a 10-foot-by-10-foot area), making it ideally suited to production housing or to entry-level housing.

Easy to work with and handle. Perhaps no other roofing product is as easy to install. In some cases, a house can be done in one day by professional contractors. Even serious DIYers have been known to tackle roofing projects, though it's highly recommended that they don't because of warranty issues.

Easy to repair. As easy as asphalt is to install, it's equally easy to repair if it gets damaged.

Style options. Asphalt comes in basic offerings for the cost-conscious, but it can be ordered in fancy styles that mimic wood shakes or slate. Basic three-tab shingles dominate the category, but thicker, high-end laminates are available in many colors and with deep shadow lines.

Good performance record. Depending on the product line, asphalt shingles come with a 20- to 30-year warranty. Many are fire-rated (as high as Class A), and require minimal maintenance. Some manufacturers offer products that meet Energy Star requirements and qualify as a cool roof under federal standards, making them eligible for tax credits.

Cons for Asphalt Shingles:


Can be boring. Though snappy colors and styles are available, builders tend to select basic single-color products that have a tendency to look dull.

Susceptible to severe weather. In general, asphalt provides good uplift protection, but the product does not hold up well to severe weather such as hail. The NAHB Research Center says wind- and impact-resistant shingles are available, but they cost about 50 percent more than conventional products. Moreover, asphalt roofs that do not get adequate sunlight can be vulnerable to moss, mildew, and algae, which can shorten lifespan.

Longevity questions. Warranties on asphalt roofs are relatively high, but performance is closely tied to a well-ventilated roof deck and homeowner maintenance.

Can be heavy. While basic shingles weigh about 200 pounds per square, some laminated, textured, and higher-end architectural shingles can clock in at close to 500 pounds per square.

Nascent recycling. According to the Northeast Recycling Council, the U.S. manufactures and disposes of about 11 million tons of asphalt shingles per year. Most—about 10 million tons—is from installation scraps and tear-offs from re-roofing. Moreover, the group cites EPA studies that shingle waste makes up 8% of the total building-related waste stream. The asphalt recycling industry is still young, however, though manufacturers are developing ways to find uses for the material including pavement, new roofing, and road and ground cover, says the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery.

Pros for Metal Roofing:

Lightweight. Metal is about the lightest material you can install on your roof. Though weight varies based on type, contractors and manufacturers say aluminum varies from about 50 pounds per square, while steel can be anywhere from 100 pounds to 250 pounds per square, says MetalRoofingSource.com.

Longevity. Metal offers good weather resistance and can last a long time. There are rumors of copper and zinc metal roofs in Europe lasting well over 100 years. Though this might be possible with care and maintenance, you can reasonably expect a metal roof to last about 60 years, give or take.

Long warranty. Many metal manufacturers offer limited warranties that last up to 50 years.

Stellar extreme-weather performance. Contractors say metal is excellent at preventing leaks, offers good wind resistance, and is fireproof. In fact, says the Metal Roofing Alliance, some insurance companies offer home buyers up to 30% reduction in premiums for weather-resistant metal roofs .

Environmentally friendly. One of the most energy-efficient roofing materials, metal reflects heat and helps keep houses cooler in the summer. Plus, the product often contains high, recycled content and is itself recyclable.

Cons for Metal Roofing:


Very expensive. Metal's biggest drawback is the cost. Though manufacturers say prices have come down, metal, on average, costs three times as much as asphalt. Pricier metals such as stainless steel, copper, and zinc can cost way more.

Can have a harsh appearance. Metal has a long history on barns and agricultural buildings, but for those who aren't familiar with this look, it can be harsh in a residential subdivision.
    Scotty, Scotts Contracting-- I have to chime in here: I don't agree with the Authors choice of words 'Harsh' "Metal Roofs come in every type of Designers Choice and Style and can mimic the "Look" of: Slate, Tile, Asphalt, etc.  They also come in every color in the Color Wheel and in some applications Custom Colors can be Ordered, with most manufacturers Guarantying the Color for 20 years.  The new metal roofing products when installed correctly can mimic any type of Asphalt Roofing materials; therefore, "A Home with a Metal Roof can blend in any Neighborhood".] 


    CLICK HERE to Email Scotty, with Scotts Contracting for any additional Comments, Questions, or for a Green Proposal for your next Roofing Project.

    Extreme expansion and contraction. Critics contend that some metal roofs expand and contract quite a bit, which compromises their long-term performance and their ability to remain water tight. This is often a function of the installation.

    Past failures and perception issues. Architects say there was a time when basic corrugated metal roofs corroded in 10 years or less. In some seaside applications, rust on some roofs is visible. Most products today, however, are made with alloys and specialized resin paints that can handle salt spray, extreme heat, and heavy precipitation without issue, the industry says.

    Product selection is important for good performance. Though high-performing materials such as stainless steel, copper, and zinc are available, low-end steel products are still available. Architects advise against low-grade metals that are thinner and less durable, especially near seaside locations.Article by: Nigel F. Maynard is a senior editor for Builder magazine.

    CLICK HERE to Email Scotty, with Scotts Contracting for any additional Comments, Questions, or for a Green Proposal for your next Roofing Project.scottscontracting@gmail.com

    • I have a local recycling source for Asphalt Shingles. 
    • Tamko- Roofing Supply Manufacturer I consider a Local Company (within 300 miles)
    --
    Scott's Contracting
    scottscontracting@gmail.com

    Green Tile News- Recycle Tile-

    Florida Tile increases waste content in products

    September 8, 2010

    ARTICLE TOOLS
    EmailEmailPrintPrintReprintsReprintsshareShare



    LEXINGTON, KY -- Florida Tile has developed and brought on-line a new scrap tile crushing facility which allows more post-production fired tile than ever to be crushed for reintroduction into the body of tile made at its Lawrenceburg facility.

    "This achieves two things simultaneously," explained Sean Cilona, Marketing Director for Florida Tile. "First, our proprietary design and subsequent implementation will have a dramatic impact on the waste stream. Now, virtually all scrap tile can be diverted from landfills for use in our production facilities. Secondly, the nature of our process allows for all of our tile lines to contain recycled content. This is important to our industry and to designers, architects and builders, all of whom have an interest in a broader spectrum of tile with recycled content."

    Fired tile, especially porcelain, is one of the hardest materials on earth. For years, tile manufacturers have struggled with ways to deal with fired tile scrap. Crushing this material to reintroduce it into the production mix requires large capital investment and know-how, according to Florida Tile.

    "Previously, Florida Tile has successfully crushed and reused scrap wall tile and red body floor tile," said Cilona. "Now, with the installation of our new crushing line, we have the capability of crushing and recycling not only those products as well as porcelain, but also virtually any scrap ceramic material and using that for content across all product lines." Cilona noted that manufacturers for years have been able to crush scrap tile, but the crushed content was usually limited in use, generally to create only one recycled tile style or line. "This meant tile makers could introduce a percentage of scrap usually into a very limited product line, and the result was often less aesthetically pleasing and more variable in appearance," he said. "Florida Tile took a different path by engineering a process using the most advanced machinery to create an ideal aggregate by which we can introduce a greater percentage of reworked material into all of our tile lines. Right now, the formula for porcelain tile made at our Kentucky plant is 10% recycled content. Other Florida Tile products contain even higher amounts, and the company is committed to increasing those percentages in the coming months."

    Initiatives like this are all part of the growing Florida Tile CARES (Creating A Responsible Environmental Strategy) program. "This is a very strong commitment to conserve our natural resources and a great value-added benefit to our entire customer base," said Cilona. "Programs like LEED and the NAHB (National Association of Home Builders) Green Building Standard both reward the use of materials with recycled content. Also, as mainstream consumers continue to gain knowledge and become aware of building trends, they are now actively looking for products with a reduced environmental impact."


    --
    Scott's Contracting
    scottscontracting@gmail.com
    http://stlouisrenewableenergy.blogspot.com
    http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.com

    Green Power Community Challenge Launched Nationwide

    Green Power Community Challenge Launched Nationwide September 20, 2010

    The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is kicking off its national "Green Power Community Challenge," a year-long campaign to encourage cities, towns, villages and Native American tribes to use renewable energy and fight climate change. To participate in the challenge, a local government must join EPA's Green Power Partnership and use green power in amounts that meet the program's purchase requirements. The local government must also conduct a campaign to encourage local businesses and residents to collectively buy or produce green power on-site in amounts that meet EPA requirements.

    The campaign is designed to expand upon the successes of the program, aiming to double the total aggregate amount of green power used by EPA Green Power Communities. As part of the national campaign, communities will compete to see which one can use the most green power and which one can achieve the highest green power percentage of total electricity use. There will be a separate award for each category with national recognition and special attention from EPA. The winners will be announced in September 2011.

    During the challenge, from Sept. 20, 2010, to Sept. 1, 2011, communities will be ranked for the two award categories on EPA's website on a quar terly schedule; EPA will also provide technical assistance to help participants increase their green power usage.


    For more information on EPA's Green Power Community Challenge, visit www.epa.gov/greenpower/gpcchallenge

    For more information about EPA's Green Power Communities, visit epa.gov/greenpower/communities/index.htm 


    --
    Scott's Contracting
    scottscontracting@gmail.com
    http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.blogspot.com

    Climate Change Threatens to Undermine Progress on Development


    John Kerry

    John Kerry

    Posted: September 21, 2010 10:55 AM

    Ten years ago, 189 nations united behind eight ambitious development goals for 2015, known as the Millennium Development Goals. Despite financial crises and natural disasters, we have made dramatic advances toward targets such as halving global poverty and achieving universal primary education.

    Even as we race to achieve these targets by 2015, we must take urgent steps to ensure that our achievements remain sustainable long after. That means factoring climate change into our long-term development strategies.

    Here's why: On a range of crosscutting issues from global hunger to global health, changing global temperatures and weather patterns will inject a new element of chaos into the already-fragile existences of the world's poorest people. Among the predictions are more famine and drought, expanding epidemics, more natural disasters, more resource scarcity and significant human displacement. Ominously, the poorest and least equipped to respond are likely to be among the hardest hit.

    It's next to impossible to attribute any single natural disaster or weather event entirely to climate change. But the pattern of recent events provides insights into the challenges we will face in a warming world. We may not know if flooding in Pakistan was worsened by climate change, but the best scientists tell us that climate change will bring more flooding and extreme weather events. We don't know the precise role that competition over water played in intensifying conflict in Darfur, but we do know that climate change is projected to alter freshwater flows around the world.

    To understand the stakes, consider the progress -- however mixed -- we have already made toward meeting two of our Millennium Development Goals for 2015. Then consider the likely impact of unchecked climate change over the next few decades.

    First, let's think about infectious diseases like malaria. This ancient scourge kills approximately three quarters of a million children under five a year. But the world is making progress: Thanks to bed nets, insecticides and improved access to medications, one third of the countries confronting malaria have seen the number of cases drop by at least half since 2000. Unfortunately, as mosquitoes expand their range due to climate change, malaria is now reappearing in areas where it was once eliminated, like the Kenyan highlands. Nor is malaria the only climate-affected health challenge. Changing weather patterns also spread disease by counteracting efforts to provide adequate sanitation for the 2.6 billion people currently lacking it -- another reason why The Lancet has warned that "climate change could be the biggest global health threat of the 21st century."

    Second, while progress in the fight against global hunger has been more uneven, the Obama administration has made unprecedented new investments in food security. In 2009, the ranks of the world's hungry actually declined for the first time in fifteen years. But Pakistan's floods and Russia's wildfires show how dramatic weather events -- which climate change will likely increase -- threaten global food availability and prices. As climate change alters weather patterns and increases droughts, our crops will suffer.

    Clearly, the impacts of climate change threaten the stability of our development strategies. It's time we craft a path forward where our development and climate goals are mutually reinforcing.

    I continue to believe that the most effective step we can take to address climate change is to pass strong domestic legislation that limits greenhouse gas pollution and facilitates efforts to achieve a forceful global climate change treaty. Difficult as this is, we must and will continue to pursue these vital long-term goals. But in the meantime, we should also take advantage of near-term opportunities to address climate change and advance our development goals at the same time.

    As the world's leaders gather at the UN, the time is right to craft a formal strategy for integrating climate change -- both mitigation and adaptation -- into our development plans going forward. New climate financing to support low-carbon development strategies must be coordinated with similar development investments -- not working at cross purposes. Recipient nations must be active players in developing strategies that meet their needs as well. And we should partner with emerging nations and others to ensure that all with the capacity to contribute are doing so.

    A holistic approach to development and climate zeroes in on scientific and technological innovation that addresses our climate and development goals at the same time. For example, if we replace old, dirty cook stoves with affordable, fuel-efficient alternatives, that will reduce deforestation, protect public health and even reduce flooding by strengthening soil.

    The Millennium Development Goals remain as good an organizing framework as we have for how to meet the shared and urgent needs of people everywhere.

    But we must look beyond 2015. To ensure that our achievements are enduring and sustainable, we must increasingly consider the growing threat of climate change in our development policies.

     

    Follow John Kerry on Twitter: www.twitter.com/JohnKerry

    Related News On Huffington Post:

    Millennium Development Goals: World Leaders Convene To Assess Progress

    Ten years ago, world leaders from 189 countries signed the United Nations Millennium Declaration, pledging to fight global poverty. The plan laid out eight goals,...

    Climate Change Effects Fought With Ancient Seeds In Mexico

    More than 500 years after Spanish priests brought wheat seeds to Mexico to make wafers for the Catholic Mass, those seeds may bring a new...

    Climate Change: Melting Glaciers Expose Ancient Artifacts In Nothern Europe Faster Than Archaeologists Can Collect Them (VIDEO)

    In this video from Reuters, Lars Piloe and his team of archaeologists race against the clock to collect ancient artifacts exposed from the rapidly melting...

    World Poverty Falling Sharply But Patchily

    MANILA, Philippines — It's lunchtime, but the cooking pots are empty outside Nurain Dimalao's shack. Her 7-year-old son plays amid the flies in garbage-strewn sand....


    --
    Scott's Contracting
    scottscontracting@gmail.com
    http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.blogspot.com
    http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.com
    scotty@stlouisrenewableenergy.com

    Now It's Congress' Turn to Quickly Move on Trade

    Leo Hindery, Jr.

    Posted: September 21, 2010 09:30 AM

    I've spent a lot of time in my blog posts urging the Obama administration and Congress to take immediate action, from every available direction, to plug the 22 million employee "jobs gap" that is strangling our country today. And you can be sure that everywhere members of Congress went on the campaign trail this summer and will travel to this fall, they are hearing this exact same thing from voters. Luckily for Members in races this year, there are still five weeks remaining until the mid-term elections to talk with voters about job creation. For the nation, however, there are only a limited number of days left in this Session of Congress -- less than thirty days for sure, even assuming a lame-duck session - to see some quick actions taken.

    Unfortunately, two big issues -- energy and immigration -- which are key to the future of the U.S. economy and our prospects for significant job creation will not be addressed at all in what remains of this Session, and, in all encompassing ways, maybe not even in the next Session. However, pieces of each could be legislated early next year which would quickly create some of those jobs we're missing. And let's be clear, the future of the U.S. economy and our prospects for significant job creation will be hugely impacted by how we eventually manage these two issues.

    As soon as possible next year, Congress should at least seek to agree on a renewable energy standard for the country that would require utilities to provide escalating amounts of power from renewable sources like wind and solar energy. And then it should tackle the promotion of home-efficiency retrofits, high-efficiency home appliances, natural gas-powered commercial trucks, and medium-cost electric vehicles, which would have significant job-creating effects.

    Regarding immigration, also early next year there are important hearings that should be held. In them, Congress needs to remind the American people and workers that most of the 11 million-plus unauthorized immigrants have been resident here for many years with the active encouragement of our federal and state governments and the business community, mostly doing jobs that businesses wanted to under-pay for. They have worked hard for years, and now they're entitled to both pathways to legalization and a temporary worker program.

    Unauthorized immigration is not at all the culprit behind either the broad-based erosion of the American Dream or the current jobs crisis that many contend. Rather, it's factors like declining unionization, the erosion of the real value of the minimum wage and wages in general for 90% of workers, and our grossly unbalanced foreign trade.

    The one area therefore where meaningful action still can and should be taken by Congress in the relatively few days remaining is trade reform, where at least three quick steps should be taken.

    Right now, around 40% of U.S. exports are to countries with which we have bilateral trade agreements, which we often fail to fully enforce, and many of them are out of touch with today's global economy and where the U.S. stands in it. The other 60% of our exports are to markets with trade barriers, which need to be broken down in order to provide American manufacturers with level global playing fields. And while President Obama is rightly proud of recent increases in U.S. exports, the White House continues to largely ignore the U.S. trade deficit which is skyrocketing and crushing both our economy and millions of our workers.

    The Obama administration is abdicating on trade generally and, in the extreme, it is tolerating China's trade abuses, proudly settling for China's recent opening of its market to "American pork and pork products" (and little else), and endlessly studying -- rather than acting upon -- the fundamental economic rebalancing that must take place among the world's major trading partners. Imports from China alone are now responsible for about 75% of our deficit in manufactured goods and 55% of our overall trade deficit.

    Those three quick-hit trade initiatives that Congress should quickly undertake before the end of the year are:

    1. Hold hearings on the strategic and economic differences between a manufacturing and industrial strategy and a policy, and between the administration's goal of "doubling (gross) exports over five years" and, instead, "increasing net exports," which would create millions more jobs. Every other major developed nation plus China and India has a "manufacturing and industrial policy." Unfortunately, the administration says that we need only a "manufacturing strategy", which conveys an unwillingness to engage with the private sector at exactly the time in history when we need to do so the most and which won't revitalize our diminished manufacturing sector or close our oppressive trade gap.

    2. Take up and then vote down the President's three pending free trade agreements (FTAs) with South Korea, Colombia and Panama. These three agreements will destroy many more American jobs than they will ever create. First negotiated under Bush but now embraced by Obama simply, it seems, for the sake of showing momentum, these three FTAs would allow, in the same way that NAFTA did, for massive imports into the U.S. with few opportunities for reciprocal exports of U.S. products. These agreements are particularly flawed in the areas of U.S. beef and agricultural exports and automotive and industrial textile imports into the U.S. They are more broadly flawed in their failure to account for the relative advantages afforded the three proposed trading partners by their value-added tax systems. FTAs must apply the same rules to both parties and to accept agreements that impose nonreciprocal tariff and tariff-elimination schedules violates the most basic concepts of free trade, which are fairness and balance.

    3. Hold hearings regarding trade enforcement, which I am convinced will show that right now we do not either enforce our trade agreements very well or protect our domestic manufacturers, especially their hard-gained intellectual property. U.S. Trade Representative Ron Kirk has said that, "There's a danger in which we believe the only way to get new market growth is just to go get new trade agreements." To his credit he has suggested a strategy that focuses less on bilateral deals and more on boosting exports through promotion and 'more rigorous enforcement of trade rules'. Yet he has received almost no encouragement from the White House on this approach, even after showing that just for our software and high-technology sectors, compliance with World Trade Organization rules on intellectual property rights by China and Southeast Asian nations would boost annual U.S. exports by $50 to $75 billion. In these hearings, Congress should also look at moving trade enforcement to a fully enabled and funded office in the Justice Department. Trade negotiation and the enforcement of agreements are distinct activities requiring very different skills, and enforcement best belongs with 'enforcers', not with those who negotiated the trade agreements.

    We all know that Congress failed to pass a meaningful jobs bill because of Republican resistance. As Ezra Klein said, "Republicans managed to take a jobs bill, weaken it to an unemployment benefits and state and local relief bill, weaken that to an unemployment benefits bill, and then weaken that bill." As a consequence, the 30 million real unemployed workers have been left only with a series of palliative benefit extensions, which is hardly a valid mechanism for creating the millions of jobs destroyed by the Great Recession of 2007 and for attacking the record-level income inequality that has left 90% of American workers with stagnant wages for nearly two decades.

    Members of Congress have their work cut out for them. With the White House seemingly devoted to other issues, Congress needs to act yet this year on any areas it can which can yet chip away at the continuing absence of that much needed jobs bill. Let's start with trade where Congress should take its oversight responsibilities seriously and begin to redirect the administration's approach toward fair free trade.

    Let's also, through this piece and in others to follow, start telling U.S. Trade Representative Ron Kirk and Commerce Secretary Gary Locke that henceforth whenever they meet on global trade and investment issues, the trade principles outlined above should be paramount. The Global Services Trade Summit begins in DC tomorrow, and in addition to Ambassador Kirk and Secretary Locke, attendees will include Anand Sharma, Minister of Commerce, India; Bruno Ferrari, Secretary of the Economy, Mexico; Pascal Lamy, Director-General, World Trade Organization; and trade ministers from around the world. They should all hear that from within the U.S. Congress, there are soon to be some 'new sheriffs in town' when it comes to U.S. trade.

    Leo Hindery, Jr. is Chairman of the US Economy/Smart Globalization Initiative at the New America Foundation and a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. Currently an investor in media companies, he is the former CEO of Tele-Communications, Inc. (TCI), Liberty Media and their successor AT&T Broadband. He also serves on the Board of the Huffington Post Investigative Fund.



    --
    Scott's Contracting
    scottscontracting@gmail.com
    http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.blogspot.com
    http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.com
    scotty@stlouisrenewableenergy.com

    Hydrogen-Powered Personal Helicopter


    September 21st, 2010 - What do you think?

    Hydrogen Helicopter A personal helicopter weighing just 230 lb created sizzling news when it flew on hydrogen with zero emission. With an ability to carry payloads up to 800 lbs, this pocket Hercules can fly for 90 minutes. Fitted with easy controls, this reaches a speed of 100 knots thanks to a pair of small yet powerful motors mounted on it. Two common and easily available things – Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and a catalyst – combined to bring about a milestone in personal aviation history with attention to the environmental issues as well! Avimech has combined these two to power engine in to an innovative machine.

    YouTube: Avimech Dragonfly | More Videos

    A unique combination:
    Avimech has combined two ideas – a rocket and a helicopter – to create this cute little personal aviation machine baptizing it as 'Dragonfly.' Actually this idea to utilize H2O2 and a catalyst has been around for some time. But to use them to power this hybrid version of a rocket in a helicopter is the brain child of Avimech.

    Motors at rotor tips:
    There are two powerful small motors fitted at rotor tips which resemble rocket nozzles. These nozzles propel the rotors getting power from the reaction of H2O2 with the catalyst. There is no gearbox. There are two fuel tanks to store H2O2. The H2O2 reacts with the catalyst in the rocket nozzles and the reaction powers the rotor nozzles which sets the rotor tips in high-speed motion.

    Common ingredients:
    Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) is very safe environmentally and easily available chemical. Usually printing presses are cleaned with H2O2. This commercial-grade H2O2 is diluted and used in the rotor nozzles. The reaction of H2O2 with the catalyst produces the high pressure which sets the blades into motion.

    A simple but great machine:
    The motors are 8-inch long and they can generate 102 hp which helps the aircraft peak a speed of 100 knots. The H2O2 is diluted to about 50-70%. And when the catalyst reacts with the H2O2, only water vapor gets released and no other harmful emission occurs.

    "(ERA) helicopter:"
    Acclaimed as the first ever created environmentally responsible aviation (ERA) helicopter, Dragonfly certainly deserves this epithet. Emitting nothing but water vapor and running on only hydrogen- an environmentally safe fuel, this helicopter does not pollute the space with harmful emissions like carbon.

    Future plans?
    This hydrogen-powered, zero-carbon-emission environmentally friendly but expensive helicopter has been the brainchild of Ricardo Cavalcanti of Avimech. Though at present the engines are not fuel-efficient – guzzling 11 gallons of fuel per hour, the day may not be far off when this is also rectified and a perfect eco-friendly personal aviation machine may be available.



    --
    Scott's Contracting
    scottscontracting@gmail.com
    http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.blogspot.com
    http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.com
    scotty@stlouisrenewableenergy.com

    Fed Ponders Bolder Action on Economic Growth

    Fed to ponder whether bolder action needed

    Ben Bernanke AP – FILE - In a Thursday, Sept. 2, 2010 photo, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke testifies on Capitol …
    Related Quotes
    Symbol Price Change
    ^DJI 10,753.62 +145.77
    ^GSPC 1,142.71 0.00
    ^IXIC 2,355.83 0.00
    <img width=1 height=1 alt="" src="http://us.bc.yahoo.com/b?P=akAP8ULEatkk_8lwTJTr_htYRaui3UyYrlIACjoU&T=1l83nqss8%2fX%3d1285074514%2fE%3d8903535%2fR%3dnews%2fK%3d5%2fV%3d2.1%2fW%3dH%2fY%3dYAHOO%2fF%3d4115601710%2fH%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--%2fQ%3d-1%2fS%3d1%2fJ%3d8B6AC442&U=12ask1hvq%2fN%3dHksuDEJe5hw-%2fC%3d-1%2fD%3dFB%2fB%3d-1%2fV%3d0">
    &lt;SCRIPT language="JavaScript1.1" src="http://ad.doubleclick.net/adj/N3382.yahoo.comOX2562/B4160537.34;abr=!ie;sz=150x30;click=http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=15kk28hda/M=757214.13840991.13863598.5439043/D=news/S=8903535:FB/Y=YAHOO/EXP=1285081714/L=akAP8ULEatkk_8lwTJTr_htYRaui3UyYrlIACjoU/B=HUsuDEJe5hw-/J=1285074514723749/K=get0pbgAVDGcCZBR5cgTUA/A=5958849/R=1/*;dcopt=rcl;mtfIFPath=nofile;ord=1289855914265"&gt;&lt;/SCRIPT&gt;&lt;NOSCRIPT&gt;&lt;A HREF="http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=15kk28hda/M=757214.13840991.13863598.5439043/D=news/S=8903535:FB/Y=YAHOO/EXP=1285081714/L=akAP8ULEatkk_8lwTJTr_htYRaui3UyYrlIACjoU/B=HUsuDEJe5hw-/J=1285074514723749/K=get0pbgAVDGcCZBR5cgTUA/A=5958849/R=2/SIG=133q6617f/*http://ad.doubleclick.net/jump/N3382.yahoo.comOX2562/B4160537.34;abr=!ie4;abr=!ie5;sz=150x30;ord=1289855914265?"&gt;&lt;IMG SRC="http://ad.doubleclick.net/ad/N3382.yahoo.comOX2562/B4160537.34;abr=!ie4;abr=!ie5;sz=150x30;ord=1289855914265?" BORDER=0 WIDTH=150 HEIGHT=30 ALT="Click Here"&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/NOSCRIPT&gt;<img width=1 height=1 alt="" src="http://us.bc.yahoo.com/b?P=akAP8ULEatkk_8lwTJTr_htYRaui3UyYrlIACjoU&T=1l8s89v6g%2fX%3d1285074514%2fE%3d8903535%2fR%3dnews%2fK%3d5%2fV%3d2.1%2fW%3dH%2fY%3dYAHOO%2fF%3d2912015700%2fH%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--%2fQ%3d-1%2fS%3d1%2fJ%3d8B6AC442&U=13dc9h80t%2fN%3dHUsuDEJe5hw-%2fC%3d757214.13840991.13863598.5439043%2fD%3dFB%2fB%3d5958849%2fV%3d1">

    WASHINGTON – Federal Reserve policymakers are wrestling with what additional steps — if any — should be taken to strengthen the plodding economy and drive down near double-digit unemployment.

    Lots of lively debate is expected at Tuesday's meeting. But few expect any major programs to be unveiled. Instead, many will be looking to see if the Fed offers new clues about the timing of any new aid and what changes in the economy would trigger such a move. To give the Fed extra time for discussions, Tuesday's meeting is scheduled to start around 8 a.m. — earlier than when it has two-day sessions.

    There are differing views on the Fed's main policymaking group — the Federal Open Markets Committee — about what should be done. And some pressure is off after a few mildly positive economic reports showed the pace of layoffs has slowed, shoppers' appetites to spend has picked up and factory production is growing.

    The reports have helped to ease concerns about the economy slipping back into a new recession, giving the Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke and his colleagues a little breathing room.

    "We may be emerging from a soft patch," said Chris Rupkey, economist at the Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, of the recent batch of encouraging reports. "This should allay the concerns of Fed officials."

    Even without action, the Fed could send a stronger signal that it is prepared to act if it appears the economy is in danger of heading into another recession. Doing so would be aimed at boosting public and investor confidence that the Fed will come to the rescue to keep the economic recovery alive. That would reinforce a message Bernanke delivered in late August: the Fed still has some tools to help the economy and will use them if needed.

    Investors appeared hopeful Monday that the Fed policymakers would offer some hints. The Dow Jones industrial average closed 145 points up and broader indexes closed higher, extending the September rally into its fourth week.

    Policymakers' discussions on Tuesday — the last session before the Nov. 2 elections — are likely to focus on what specifically would trigger the Fed to take bolder action to help the economy, as well as what the action would be. Those discussions could tee-up a decision later this year, at the Fed's Nov. 2-3 meeting or at its last regularly scheduled session of the year on Dec. 14.

    For his own part, Bernanke laid out some important markers in his Aug. 27 speech at an economics conference in Jackson Hole, Wyo. He said the Fed would take action if the economic outlook were to "deteriorate significantly" and if the country seemed headed for a bout of deflation — a destabilizing drop in wages, prices of goods and services, and the value of stocks, homes and other assets.

    Bernanke didn't spell out what would constitute a significant deterioration, in terms of unemployment, economic growth or other key barometers. Those are some of the things he and his colleagues will be examining at Tuesday's session.

    The Fed's meeting comes one day after the National Bureau of Economic Research, a group of academic economists, declared that the recession that began in December 2007 ended in June 2009. It marked the longest and most severe downturn since the Great Depression. The decision won't affect the Fed's deliberations on Tuesday. That's because the Fed makes policy decisions based on where it thinks the economy is heading, say six months from now. Not where it has been.

    Economic growth slowed to a crawl in the second quarter — advancing at a pace of just 1.6 percent, compared with 3.7 percent growth in the first three months of the year. Growth in the July-September period is expected to be similarly weak. That raises the odds that the unemployment rate, already high at 9.6 percent, could climb even higher in the months ahead.

    The risk is that this could trap the economy into another vicious circle: High unemployment could make consumers and businesses even more cautious in their spending, and that in turn weakens the economy further.

    As to options for juicing up economic growth, Bernanke indicated a preference to launch a new program to buy large amounts of government debt. Such a move would be designed to lower already low rates on mortgages, corporate loans and other debt. The idea behind that is to entice people and businesses to spend more, which would strengthen the economy and lower unemployment.

    In monetary policy circles, that's known as "quantitative easing." That's when the Fed — as it did during the recession and financial crises — takes unconventional steps to inject massive amounts of money into the economy. The Fed does this to lower interest rates and to help banks lend more. As a result, the Fed's balance sheet has ballooned to $2.3 trillion, nearly triple since before the crisis.

    At its last meeting in August, the Fed, worried about the loss of economic momentum, took a small step to aid the recovery: It decided to use proceeds from its huge mortgage portfolio and buy government debt. The small amount involved helped nudge down mortgage rates. But it would take a bigger buying binge to really push rates push rates down.

    But even that wouldn't guarantee that Americans would rush out and buy homes, cars and other things. The Fed's key interest rate is already at a record low near zero. It's been there since December 2008. And, the economy is still only plodding along.



    --
    Scott's Contracting
    scottscontracting@gmail.com
    http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.blogspot.com
    http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.com
    scotty@stlouisrenewableenergy.com

    Connect with Scotts Contracting

    FB FB Twitter LinkedIn Blog Blog Blog Blog Pinterest

    Featured Post

    How Two Friends Turned Abandoned CASTLE into a 4☆HOTEL | by @chateaudut...

    Join us on an extraordinary journey as two lifelong friends, Francis and Benoit, turn a crumbling, centuries-old castle into a stunning 4-st...