-- Scotts Contracting - StLouis Renewable Energy

Search This Blog

1.09.2011

Green Product Evaluation Tips

Here are the first 12 questions you should ask about any green building product you're evaluating—before you make your selection:

  1. How will it perform its basic function as a building material or product?

  2. How does it compare with products I use now?

  3. Is it code approved? 

  4. Is it third-party certified? 

  5. Will it contribute toward project certification? 

  6. Is it available? 

  7. How will it affect my pricing? 

  8. Will it increase my level of risk or liability? 

  9. How will it improve the level of performance of my homes? 

  10. How will it contribute toward sustainability? 

  11. Will it require new sequencing or installation skills/trades? 

  12. Is it worth the investment for the benefits?

After answering these 12 questions, apply your own experience and expertise to filter out products that would put you outside your comfort zone in terms of unknowns and risks.

Read Complete Article Here: www.ecohomemagazine.com



--
Scott's Contracting
scottscontracting@gmail.com
http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.blogspot.com
http://scottscontracting.wordpress.com

Spray Foam: Open Cell VS Closed Cell

Scotty writes: In response to a prior questions:

Q:Which Spray Foam Insulation is Best, Open Cell or Closed Cell?

Open-Cell Vs. Closed-Cell

The real distinction between types of foam insulation focuses on whether they are open- or closed-cell. In general, both are made from the same materials and work in the same way, trapping air or gas in a plastic matrix. The differences start with the "blowing agents" used to create bubbles and end with both varied performance and cost.

Open-cell foam costs slightly less for the same thickness, but offers lower per-inch R-values than closed-cell products. In some instances, this is a disadvantage, but where thickness is less relevant, or where higher R-values are not needed, then open-cell can provide the better choice. It also has some green advantages over closed-cell: The blowing agent used to install open-cell insulation is water, which reacts with air to become CO2—while closed-cell products use HFCs.

Because CO2 expands quickly, the bubbles tend to burst before the plastic sets, and hence the "open cells," which produce a spongy, lightweight foam. The industry describes the foam as "half-pound" material, which simply means the foam has a mass that weighs 0.5 pounds per cubic foot. This density yields an R-value of approximately 3.6 per inch, equivalent to most traditional insulations. Because of the open cell structure, open-cell foam allows some vapor to pass through, making it a good choice in hot, humid climates, and under roof sheathing, such as in conditioned attics, where water vapor caught between insulation and sheathing could promote wood rot.

In short, open-cell foam, tested in accordance with ASTM E 283, provides an air barrier with vapor breathability. Water-blown solutions have less environmental impact than the current HFCs used for most closed-cell spray-foam insulation. And open-cell has about twice the noise reduction coefficient in normal frequency ranges as closed-cell foam. Because the blowing agent in open-cell insulation dissipates as it sets, instead of slowly over time, there is no degeneration of the R-value—a minor point given aged closed-cell R-values still trump open-cell R-values by a magnitude of nearly 100%.

Unlike open-cell foam, closed-cell foam uses chemical blowing agents that come in liquid form and become gasses as they are applied. These gasses expand, but not as quickly as CO2, allowing the polyurethane plastic to set before the bubbles burst. This yields dense foam weighing nearly 2 pounds per cubic foot, and without the capillary characteristics of open-cell, it remains impermeable. The blowing agents used perform like the inert gasses between the panes of high-performance windows, adding to the insulating qualities of the foam. Unlike open-cell foam, closed-cell foam rarely requires any trimming, with little or no jobsite waste.

Closed-cell has more obvious advantages over open-cell, and a slightly higher price tag (20% to 30% for the same thickness). It provides both a vapor and air barrier and offers an aged R-value of a whopping 6.5 per inch. Because of its density and glue-like consistency, it remains very strong, providing both compressive and tensile strength to structure comparable to added sheathing, increasing the racking strength of walls by as much as 300%, according to the NAHB Research Center. Because water does not penetrate or degrade the product, FEMA recommends closed-cell foam as a suitable insulation material for flood regions.

The principle disadvantage of closed-cell foam comes with overkill. If you do not require the extra vapor barrier, structural strength, and R-value per inch, then you may be wasting money. As for the added wall strength, while real and substantial, it's not acknowledged by building codes currently, so you can't reduce the structural bracing as a tradeoff.
---------------
Information found at: http://www.ecohomemagazine.com

Spray Foam: Toxic Blowing Agents and Fire Proofing ecohomemagazine.com/green-products/expanding-options.aspx

--
Scott's Contracting
scottscontracting@gmail.com
http://stlouisrenewableenergy.blogspot.com
http://scottscontracting.wordpress.com

 

Solar Break-Thru: Two Energetic Electronic States from One Photon

Scientists Generate Two Energetic Electronic States from One Photon

Double yield via singlet fission could mean 35% efficiency boost for solar

December 2, 2010

Researchers from the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) and the University of Colorado, Boulder (UCB), have reported the first designed molecular system that produces two triplet states from an excited singlet state of a molecule, with essentially perfect efficiency.

The breakthrough could lead to a 35 percent increase in light-harvesting yield in cells for photovoltaics and solar fuels.

The experiments, using a process called singlet fission, demonstrated a 200 percent quantum yield for the creation of two triplets of the molecule 1,3-diphenylisobenzofuran (DPIBF) at low temperatures.

In singlet fission, a light-absorbing molecular chromophore shares its energy with a nearby non-excited neighboring molecule to yield a triplet excited state of each. If the two triplets behave independently, two electron-hole pairs can be generated for each photon absorbed in a solar cell. This process could subsequently increase by one third.the conversion efficiency of solar photons into electricity or solar fuels.

The researchers identified DPIBF as a promising candidate while searching for molecular chromophores that have the required ratio of singlet and triplet energy states.

Earlier, NREL and Los Alamos National Laboaratory had demonstrated an analgous two-electrons-from-one photon bonus using semiconductor quantum dots in a process NREL termed Multiple Exciton Generation. The latest advance is the first to demonstrate the electron multiplication phenomenon via  the singlet-fission process in molecules.

Until this most recent advance, singlet fission had been known as a somewhat obscure phenomenon occurring at low efficiency in a small number of molecular systems. In 2004, NREL and UCB revisited singlet fission as a potential way to maximize solar photon conversion efficiency. In 2006, NREL’s Arthur J. Nozik and Mark C. Hanna calculated the gains in thermodynamic efficiencies that were possible with solar cells based on singlet fission. These activities led to a much more extensive search for the best candidate molecules in a collaboration between NREL and the research group at the UCB led by Josef Michl.

The research has been published in the Journal of the American Chemical Society.  Authors are NREL’s Justin C. Johnson and Arthur J. Nozik, and UCB’s Josef Michl.  For a technical summary of this article, please visit http://www.nrel.gov/news/pdfs/technical_summary_20101202_press_release.pdfPDF

NREL is the U.S. Department of Energy's primary national laboratory for renewable energy and energy efficiency research and development. NREL is operated for DOE by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC.

Visit NREL online at www.nrel.gov

1.08.2011

Top 10 (or so) in 2010- Solar News



On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Adam Browning, Vote Solar <adam@votesolar.org> wrote:

Friends-

It's been a big year, and there's a lot to celebrate.  Here's our count of our top 10 (or so) in 2010:

- New 1 GW program for wholesale distributed generation in California.  We--and many allies--put nearly three years into the effort to build a new market for mid-sized solar.  These are projects that can utilize the existing distribution network to come on-line quicker and closer to load, yet still with enough scale to rival costs of natural gas generation. On December 16, the effort paid off when the California Public Utilities Commission unanimously adopted the Renewable Auction Mechanism - or RAM.  The 1 GW pilot program requires utilities to conduct biannual auctions for renewable projects under 20 MW in size.  The idea is to provide a regular drumbeat of sustained business opportunity and healthy competition that helps drive down costs; standard contracts with equitable terms and conditions that reduce transaction costs; and development security of $60/kW and relatively quick on-line times to help ensure project viability and market functionality.  All in all, it's an elegant design that rounds out California's solar market nicely and serves as a model for other jurisdictions seeking to tap the potential of the new wholesale distributed generation market. Keyes & Fox and the Solar Alliance were true heros in the effort.

- Colorado raised the bar to 30% renewables. Colorado is a great lesson in how solar success begets solar success.  An RPS standard failed three times in the legislature before a local coalition made history by taking a 10% renewable target to the voters with a ballot initiative in 2004.  It passed at the polls, and the year after, the legislature doubled the standard. This year the legislature upped the ante again - this time to 30% with a 3% DG requirement, placing Colorado squarely among our nation's leaders in renewable energy. Once a state gets a taste of the solar good life -- pretty panels on roofs, good local jobs, savings on electricity bills -- it's easier to grow from there.  Jobs were a huge selling point in this year's RPS effort: when we put out a report calculating economic benefits of an expanded solar goal, the response from press and partners was so robust that we need a bigger internet to hold it all.

- Big solar got real.
  California utilities have signed over 7 GW of solar contracts, and utilities in Arizona and Nevada are just as busy gearing up to tap the sun for power.  With RPSs in the Southwest driving demand,  federal loan guarantees enabling financing, 'Solar Energy Zones' enabling smart-from-the-start development on federal land, and the FERC notice of proposed rulemaking on regional transmission planning, variable resource integration and cost allocation, large-scale solar is moving off the drawing books and into reality.  Renewable energy on this scale, at this level of grid penetration brings another set of challenges to the table.  In order to acheive renewable success suffient to beating climate change, we need smart planning to ensure resource adequacy --essentially, figuring out how to use variable resources, at a scale never before acheived, and still ensure that there is an electron available when someone needs it. As a part of this effort, we've intervened into the CPUC's Long Term Planning Process and are leveraging our position on the WECC's Scenario Planning Steering Committee and the State of Nevada's New Energy Industry Task Force, among other efforts, to plan for success in a way that maximizes our conservation values.  Jim and Kelly are working full-time on this effort.

- New York got a sign that it's time for solar. Literally.  Sometimes you have to find new ways to get your message across.  In the last days of our first run at a 5 GW solar program for the Empire State, Vote Solar ran witty and provacative pro-solar messages on an electronic billboard right next to the state capitol building in Albany. On their way in to work, lawmakers were reminded that "When there's a huge spill of solar energy, it's just called a nice day." Good times. Campaigns like this go a long way in making up for the tedium of regulatory proceeding minutiae, which comprises the other 95% of our efforts.  Going forward, NY remains a top target for Shaun in 2011.
 
- Keeping PACE.  We managed a national campaign that helped enable these innovative local finance programs for solar and efficiency retrofits in 23 states and the District of Columbia...that is, before Fannie, Freddie and the FHFA put on the brakes.  We're not going to lie to you...after all that time, effort, and, well, hope in a promising solution, that setback hurt like a stick in the eye. Currently, multiple lawsuits filed by impacted municipalities, Attorney General of California, and Sierra Club and NRDC are proceeding apace, and folks in DC are brewing up support for federal fix-it legislation.  Stay tuned.  Some ideas are too good to die.

- Designed solar-friendly utility rates. The structure of tariffs - how much you're charged for electricity at any given time - plays a huge role in determining a solar system's payback.  Our first intervention in Southern California Edison territory increased the value of solar to commercial customers by ~26%. Now Gwen is conducting our 4th and 5th General Rate Case interventions to ensure that solar customers in Northern California and New Mexico are fairly compensated for their investments.  Just three words--"General Rate Case"--they mean a sustainable solar market to you, but to Gwen it's long-nights with Excel spreadsheets that could dim the lights of a major city.
 
- Community solar made its mark.  The traditional panels-on-your-roof approach to solar simply doesn't work for everyone. Apartment dwellers and shade tree growers, we're looking at you. This year, Vote Solar launched a new effort to empower more people to participate in the solar economy through shared, community solar programs.  More on the subject our website, here.  Both Colorado and Delaware passed legislation enabling various versions of community solar; we are participating in the implementation, as well as administrative procedures in Arizona and California.  Look for more in the year to come; Peter is your contact for the latest.
 
- Solar made inroads in the heartland.  Missouri, Illinois, and Ohio all have solar carve-outs in their RPSs totaling nearly 2,000 MW of new solar by 2025. Implementation, on the other hand, has been a bear. Things are just more difficult in semi-deregulated sort-of-restructured markets with lots of coal interests.  Some utilities in Ohio, for example, would rather file for force majeure than, you know, comply.  Claudia has spent more time in the Show-me state, working with our partners, than she ever thought she would.
 
- California avoided this year's apocalypse, lifted cap on net metering.  The country's largest solar program faced a huge hurdle -- net metering, that critical policy that allows solar owners' meters to spin backwards, was capped at 2.5% of utility system peak load, a looming barrier that was set to hit the brakes on the growing local solar industry by mid-year. After a much harder-than-expected battle involving nearly two years of press and grassroots efforts on our end, the state legislature doubled the net metering cap to 5% in February and the Governor signed the bill immediately.  We note that incentive applications passed the 2.5% mark in PG+E territory in June.  Bullet dodged.  California now has over 745 MW of behind-the-meter solar generation, and is on the way to grid-parity.  Without this action, the state's solar industry would have been in a world of hurt.

- Project Permit helps make permitting better in ArizonaProject: Permit is a campaign to use web 2.0 tools and grassroots advocacy to highlight the need for improved permitting practices. We identified Arizona as our pilot state and Phoenix (with 70% of the state's market) as our first municipal target.  After launching the interactive map and releasing a city-rankings report for Arizona, we worked with local installers (American Solar Electric and Solar City) to advocate for improved permitting in the city of Phoenix, a major market with sub-par permitting practices.  Vote Solar members in Phoenix emailed in support of improvement permitting practices prior to the city counsel's vote, and in May the Phoenix city council unanimously approved a new fee structure, lowering fees from upwards of $1000 to $225 for expedited projects. 

- Wholesale DG takes off.  Solar's new low price points make wholesale generation much more feasible. All that's needed is market mechanisms to take advantage of the opportunity.  In addition to the RAM, we worked hard in Arizona to develop new programs for wholesale distributed generation--count ~100 MW more in APS territory (As an aside, can we take a moment to collectively thank Commissioner Mayes for her super efforts for solar?  We are going to miss her and wish her the best in her next gig).  The New York Power Authority is angling for 100 MW of its own, San Francisco gets a 5 MW emission-free urban power plant, SMUD is off and running with a sold-out 100 MW feed-in tariff, all three investor-owned utilities in CA have DG PV programs (totaling 1.1 GW over the next 4-5 years), Southern California Edison has had great success with its Renewable Stanard Offer program....and that's just for starters.  Plenty of challenges remain: going forward, we expect that there will be contined discussion and activity at FERC, much more attention paid to best practices for ensuring project viability, and interconnection processes will be a key issue. 

- Silicon?  I love silicon. Our Valentines Day special was fun to make, but Hollywood did not come calling.  Someday we'll release the outtakes--but in the interim, just the threat is a good source of funding.
 
Speaking of funding (nice segue, eh?), it's been a shatteringly busy year, and we've been lucky enough to be able to grow to better meet the challenge. For much of VSI's existence, we've been just 3 people; in 2010, we welcomed Kelly Foley and Peter Olmsted to the team, increasing our staff size to eight smart, committed solar advocates and doubling our East Coast HQ.  If you are the kind of person that makes year-end donations, consider this: even a modest contribution makes a big difference to a small organization like Vote Solar.  And Lord knows there's a lot more to be done.
 
Happy holidays, friends, and best to you all in the new year.  Here's to solar heaven in twenty-eleven.

Onwards-

Adam + Team

The Vote Solar Initiative
300 Brannan Street, Suite 609
San Francisco, CA 94107





--
Scott's Contracting
scottscontracting@gmail.com
http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.blogspot.com
http://scottscontracting.wordpress.com

video highlights of Greenbuild 2010

Tradeshows. With so much going on, educational sessions, tours, and a massive show floor, it's tough to see everything a show has to offer. That's why we're bringing some video highlights of Greenbuild 2010 to you. Just click on the videos below -- no registration required!

  BASF
Jack Armstrong talks building science at BASF's Greenbuild booth.

 
Beaulieu

David Vita talks about closing the loop and Beaulieu's sustainability story during an interview at Greenbuild 2010.

  Bentley Systems
The Bentley Systems' team discusses how their company is helping to create a better built environment with BIM.


 

Derbigum
Derbigum is "Making Buildings Smart." Find out how from Travis Wallace at Derbigum's Greenbuild booth.





 

Interface, Inc.
Chief Innovations Officer John Bradford shares Interface Inc.'s mission and products.


 

NSF International
During Greenbuild, Malcolm Fox talks about NSF programs and certifications with ED+C/SF's Derrick Teal.

 

Sika Sarnafil
Sika Sarnafil's sustainability promise for vinyl roofing solutions.

 

Western Red Cedar
"Mr. Cedar" (Paul Mackie) talks about the Western Red Cedar Lumber Association.



--
Scott's Contracting
scottscontracting@gmail.com
http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.blogspot.com
http://scottscontracting.wordpress.com

Booze to Fuel-Recycled Energy Drinks

Caffeinated Alcoholic Beverages Go Green: Recycler Turns Them Into Ethanol

01/06/11
 

What's happening with all the Four Loko and other caffeinated alcoholic beverages that the Food and Drug Administration deemed unsafe back in November? Well, at least some of them are being reincarnated as fuel.

An Abingdon, Va.-based ethanol recycler, MXI Environmental Services, expects to receive as many as half a million cases of such beverages after East Coast wholesalers started throwing them out, the Associated Press reported Thursday. MXI, which can recycle about 8,000 cases of the 23.5-ounce beverages per day, will distill the beverages' alcohol content for use as fuel and sell the cans to an aluminum recycler.

East Coast beverage wholesalers started dumping the beverages after the FDA sent warning letters to the companies that produced Four Loko, Moonshot, Joose and other beverages that the caffeine included in the malt alcoholic drinks was an "unsafe food additive" and that the products "pose a public health concern."

The FDA said it would prohibit the sale of drinks such as Four Loko and Joose, which contain as much as three coffee cups worth of caffeine -- and as many as three beer cans worth of alcohol -- per can.


See full article from DailyFinance: http://srph.it/hpOnxS


--
Scott's Contracting
scottscontracting@gmail.com
http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.blogspot.com
http://scottscontracting.wordpress.com

Battery News-Renewable Energy Innovations


January 7, 2011, 8:18 am

Hold that Megawatt!

AES Energy's plant in Johnson City, N.Y., absorbs or delivers energy to the state's grid at intervals of five seconds.
AES Energy Storage
As ordered by a computer, the AES Energy Storage plant in Johnson City, N.Y.,
absorbs or delivers energy to the grid at intervals of five seconds with thousands of lithium-ion batteries.
Green: Business

"Frequency regulation," an esoteric but increasingly important element of the electric system, is getting a new competitor.

Frequency regulation is as critical as voltage control or generating capacity but is not something that most customers notice, at least until it goes catastrophically wrong. It means fine-tuning the system to keep supply and demand in balance.

The problem is that the North American electric grid is supposed to run at 60 cycles, meaning that the electrons change direction 60 times each second. In practice, if electricity supply and demand are not perfectly matched at every instant, the system runs just a little bit too fast or too slow.

If the pace strays too far from 60 cycles per second, equipment like pumps and motors run too fast or too slow and a variety of equipment will shut down to avoid getting damaged. A sharp decline in frequency was one reason that the blackout of August 2003 spread as far as it did.

Traditionally utilities maintained the balance on a gross level by adding or subtracting generation and then fine-tuning by running a steam turbine, usually at a plant that runs on coal, a little faster or a little slower. Those turbines, which have a great deal of inertia at any given moment, could deliver or supply large amounts of energy promptly. But as more electricity generation has shifted to gas turbines, which resemble jet engines and have less inertia, or to wind generators, which tap the fickle breeze, the fraction of plants that can accomplish frequency control has declined.

But on New Year's Eve, AES Energy Storage, the subsidiary of a company based near Washington that operates power plants around the world, opened a plant in Johnson City, N.Y., near Binghamton, that sells frequency regulation. It absorbs or delivers energy at intervals of five seconds, as ordered by a computer at the New York Independent System Operator, which runs the state's grid.

It does so with thousands of lithium-ion batteries, which AES selected for the same reason that electric vehicle manufacturers like them: they have the ability to absorb or deliver large amounts of current promptly and can change direction easily. The batteries were built by A123, which also builds batteries for automobile use.

Batteries are a better bet than turbines, said John M. Zahurancik, vice president of operations and deployment at AES. "You're not revving these big engines up and down, you're running a device that doesn't care if it's run up and down,'' he said.

Meanwhile, in Stephentown, N.Y., near Albany, Beacon Power is working on a plant that will do the same work but while using flywheels.

Providing frequency regulation from coal plants adds somewhat to plants' emissions; but using a flywheel or a battery is cleaner, proponents say. The flywheel system loses about 15 percent of the energy, and the batteries lose about 10 percent, the companies involved report.

The AES project has a federal loan guarantee of $17.1 million, which is close to 80 percent of its cost, according to Mr. Zaharuncik; he declined to give a precise number. The project will eventually be able to absorb or deliver 20 megawatts for a period of up to 15 minutes, although typically it is making much smaller adjustments in each direction, he said.

While the technology could eventually be used to store energy for use at different times of day – say, capturing energy from wind machines at night, when electricity is in surplus, and delivering it during the day, when prices are higher – the regulation market looks like a surer route to profit for the moment. The AES project will eventually use 800,000 batteries, each roughly the size of a D cell, installed in 53-foot shipping containers.

Many places could use frequency regulation, but New York State is drawing these early plants because its system provides for payment to third-party providers of the service.

Wind and solar plants "introduce some additional variability that you don't have with traditional thermal units,'' Mr. Zaharuncik said. With a system that has a lot of renewable energy generators, he explained, "you need some other kind of resource that complements it. ''



--
Scott's Contracting
scottscontracting@gmail.com
http://www.stlouisrenewableenergy.blogspot.com
http://scottscontracting.wordpress.com

Connect with Scotts Contracting

FB FB Twitter LinkedIn Blog Blog Blog Blog Pinterest